![]() |
pic: Crevolution 2015 Drive Module
|
Re: pic: Crevolution 2015 Drive Module
Looks pretty good, although personally I just like using 1/4" or 3/16" thick for gearboxes and such (more thickness for press fits and counterbores).
Are you planning on tensioning the belt, or are you just going C-C? If you did a slight redesign, you could tension the belt like 192 did for their 2014 gearbox (look it up, pictures on CD). |
Re: pic: Crevolution 2015 Drive Module
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Crevolution 2015 Drive Module
I'm getting more like 10.8+/-1.1 FPS (using the no load speed for the CIM, 5310+/-10% RPM).
|
Re: pic: Crevolution 2015 Drive Module
Oh yes, I apologize. The 14 fps was another calculation that I made. Also, yes, I'm just planning on doing the computed distance from the West Coast Products distance calculator.
|
Re: pic: Crevolution 2015 Drive Module
Those cut outs in the front and back are SICK.
This is what happens when I miss 1 meeting. |
Re: pic: Crevolution 2015 Drive Module
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Crevolution 2015 Drive Module
[quote=Ether;1428333]What are the other two wheels?
These modules are to be mounted in the front of our chassis, giving us 2 total driven wheels on the robot and a total 2 CIM drivetrain. |
Re: pic: Crevolution 2015 Drive Module
What ether is asking, is this segway? 😀
Any provision for encoders on this, or just letting programming team guess... |
Re: pic: Crevolution 2015 Drive Module
[quote=wyrzykowskij1;1428478]
Quote:
|
Re: pic: Crevolution 2015 Drive Module
Why did you decide to use belts?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:36. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi