![]() |
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
Quote:
Regardless, mecanum drive is horrible. You would need a game which is centered around virtually no alliance contact and great maneuverability around game pieces, tea mates, and obstacles. I can't imagine the gdc EVVVER making a game like that. Oh wait...they did. |
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
All the mecanum hate makes me sad. While I was on a team, we did mecs every year except Lunacy (obviously). What many people don't do with mecs is create a suspension for them. We never had traction issues with the suspension.
We also didn't have fancy field-oriented controls, but as the driver for 2.5 of the 3 years we did mecs, it didn't seem important. To me, it was still easy to drive once you grasped the concept of how it reacted to the controls. To all the people saying "mecs suck cause they can't defense!!", isn't there a quote about the best defense being a killer offense or something? I can remember playing Rack 'n' Roll (oh god I'm old!) where another robot tried to keep us from scoring, so we just strafed around them when they thought they had us pinned. Mecs don't work very well for the strategy of "push everyone out of my way so I can do what I want". You have to be a bit more clever about how you want to move and play the game. I think of different drives like kids in middle/high school. You've got the popular kids (WCD), the jocks (tank), theatre kids (omni, cause they're pretty and harmless), nerds (mecs), and then the couple of insanely smart ones (swerve). Just like surviving school, each type has a different strategy for being competitive in a game. Anyhow, everyone's entitled to their own opinions on mecs and other drives, but please try to back up blanket opinions with facts ;) |
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
Why do mecanum when you can just build an H-drive? :rolleyes:
|
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
Weight, gearboxes, wider drivebase for clearing obstacles, maintenance, frame complexity, etc.
Lots of pros and cons for both drivebases. |
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
Quote:
|
Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
1 Attachment(s)
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:42. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi