Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Mecanum drive on Einstein (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133288)

Mike Marandola 22-01-2015 21:15

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nuggetsyl (Post 1431981)
While some teams do very well with mechs. When push comes to shove Mike mechs do neither. The reason why most feel mechs have a chance this year is the lack of contact.

They do neither what?

Basel A 22-01-2015 21:23

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Marandola (Post 1432432)
They do neither what?

Oh engineers. Can't even figure it out when someone turns a clever phrase. He meant they can neither push nor shove.

Mike Marandola 22-01-2015 21:27

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Basel A (Post 1432434)
Oh engineers. Can't even figure it out when someone turns a clever phrase. He meant they can neither push nor shove.

I definitely got that but I thought he forgot to type something because in my previous post I asked him why he didn't think there wouldn't be a competitive mecanum team this year.

mrnoble 22-01-2015 21:30

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lcoreyl (Post 1432358)
Also depressing to think that many teams are not interested in learning more about any drivetrain that can really engage students in some real world applied physics due to the fact that this drivetrain "will not be competitive

Whether we run with it in competition or not, mecanum has been a fantastic tool for us this year in terms of inspiring students and the community. Yay mec!

DaRealSlimShady 22-01-2015 21:31

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Basel A (Post 1432434)
Oh engineers. Can't even figure it out when someone turns a clever phrase. He meant they can neither push nor shove.

I think he was confused as to why someone would state a blatantly obvious fact and act as if it were clever.

Regardless, mecanum drive is horrible. You would need a game which is centered around virtually no alliance contact and great maneuverability around game pieces, tea mates, and obstacles. I can't imagine the gdc EVVVER making a game like that.


Oh wait...they did.

alicen 22-01-2015 21:48

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
All the mecanum hate makes me sad. While I was on a team, we did mecs every year except Lunacy (obviously). What many people don't do with mecs is create a suspension for them. We never had traction issues with the suspension.

We also didn't have fancy field-oriented controls, but as the driver for 2.5 of the 3 years we did mecs, it didn't seem important. To me, it was still easy to drive once you grasped the concept of how it reacted to the controls.

To all the people saying "mecs suck cause they can't defense!!", isn't there a quote about the best defense being a killer offense or something? I can remember playing Rack 'n' Roll (oh god I'm old!) where another robot tried to keep us from scoring, so we just strafed around them when they thought they had us pinned.

Mecs don't work very well for the strategy of "push everyone out of my way so I can do what I want". You have to be a bit more clever about how you want to move and play the game. I think of different drives like kids in middle/high school. You've got the popular kids (WCD), the jocks (tank), theatre kids (omni, cause they're pretty and harmless), nerds (mecs), and then the couple of insanely smart ones (swerve). Just like surviving school, each type has a different strategy for being competitive in a game.

Anyhow, everyone's entitled to their own opinions on mecs and other drives, but please try to back up blanket opinions with facts ;)

Alan Anderson 23-01-2015 10:46

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lcoreyl (Post 1432370)
...Let's say the driver has loaded up a stack of totes and the weight actually shifts such that the back wheels have zero traction...

desired action: drive forward
actual result: ???

desired action: rotate
actual result: ???

desired action: strafe
actual result: ???

If the back wheels have absolutely no traction, and the center of gravity is directly over the front wheels, then the robot is essentially a mecanum-wheeled Segway. Forward and backward will work as expected. Strafe and turn will act identically, doing a sideways arc with a radius that depends on roller friction -- more friction gives more turn, less friction gives more strafe.

Ether 23-01-2015 10:54

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by lcoreyl (Post 1432370)
desired action: rotate
actual result: ???

desired action: strafe
actual result: ???

the "???"s above are meant as "what do you think?"

Sketch showing approximate center of rotation for frictionless rollers



IronicDeadBird 23-01-2015 11:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ether (Post 1432658)
Sketch showing approximate center of rotation for frictionless rollers



We messed around with PWMs to disable motors in a sloppy manner. Long story short when we disabled wheels on one side it moved the turning point to the midpoint between the two unpowered wheels. The implications I pulled away from this is that by adjusting the speeds on the motors we can move the turning point of the robot to anywhere within the frame. That being if you can change your turning point you can if pushed off center can roll out of any pim attempt.

Ether 23-01-2015 11:21

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by IronicDeadBird (Post 1432665)
by adjusting the speeds on the motors we can move the turning point of the robot to anywhere within the frame.

...or outside the frame.



c.shu 23-01-2015 12:21

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
Why do mecanum when you can just build an H-drive? :rolleyes:

pfreivald 23-01-2015 12:33

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by c.shu (Post 1432726)
Why do mecanum when you can just build an H-drive? :rolleyes:

Why do an H-drive when you can just do mecanum?

AustinH 23-01-2015 12:44

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
Weight, gearboxes, wider drivebase for clearing obstacles, maintenance, frame complexity, etc.

Lots of pros and cons for both drivebases.

pfreivald 23-01-2015 12:52

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinH (Post 1432737)
Weight, gearboxes, wider drivebase for clearing obstacles, maintenance, frame complexity, etc.

Lots of pros and cons for both drivebases.

Four gear boxes with four wheels and four motors is heavier and more complex than most other drive trains? (And I have no idea what you're on about with clearing obstacles needing a wider wheel base, or frame complexity. Mecanum wheels work fine on a standard frame.)

Ether 23-01-2015 12:58

Re: Mecanum drive on Einstein
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ether (Post 1432671)
...or outside the frame.

Like this.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi