![]() |
FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprogr...division-Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Very cool choices. I think a field name Tesla is especially cool.
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Love the names. A+.
-Nick |
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
I was really pushing for Left Shark and Beyoncé but I'm pretty happy about what was chosen.
All jokes aside... It's great to see so many women represented. I'm excited to see how things work out this year, especially with two fields transitioning into Einstein rather than having a dedicated location for Einstein play only. (Yes, I do know fll used Einstein I'm talking about FRC play) |
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Good choices, I like the diversity. I just wonder how often Carson/Carver will get confused due to the similarity, and Curie isn't too far off.
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Definitely loving the new names. I'm a bit wary about playing on the new fields, however, because of the Carson/Carver/Hopper/Tesla Curse. I hear no alliance from those divisions has ever won championships. :rolleyes:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Great variety for the new fields. Hopper and Tesla are great (okay, Grace Hopper is one of my personal idols), but I'm really happy that Carson and Carver were included. I think including them really says something about how important it is to use STEM skills to make a positive impact on the world socially as well as technologically. Tesla might be just plain cool, and Hopper might have been one of the greatest early computing pioneers, but Carson and Carver are the ones that stick out to me, because they both speak to the social responsibility of STEM professionals.
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Loving these new names! I particularly like Tesla.
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
Also: aren't there two Einstein fields this year? Will they be E1 and E2? |
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
I wish Tesla was going to FTC and Franklin used in FRC instead. It would be very appropriate for the two FTC fields to be Tesla and Edison given the minor disagreement those two had in the late 19th century.
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
I can start making direction signs to place at the dome entrance to point people in the right direction to their fields. A que teams should be assigned there to play traffic cop. There will be alot of teams going back and forth there all day.
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
Part of me wished that they would scrap Archimedes and Galileo in favor of only 2 syllable names, there are plenty: Turing, Feynman, Euler, Hawking, Darwin, Fermi, Bardeen, Maxwell, Sagan, Tyson, Mendel, Fleming, Kepler, Hubble, Neumann Can you guess what my major is? :D |
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
The picture of Grace Hopper on the wikipedia article is amazing. I bet no one messed with her. Definitely my new favorite superhero.
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
We liked Grace Hopper before it was cool... :p
Very excited to see our name-sake Grace Hopper as a Championship field! |
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
When I was an engineer I saw Grace Hopper and her nanosecond wire talk. Very cool.
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Adm. Hopper came to my 6th grade class and handed out nanoseconds. Wish my mom hadn't cleaned out my bedroom when I went off to college...
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
I have a big issue, with two of these fields transitioning to Einstein it gives those fields an unfair advantage to seating to watch the final matches, and the two fields will need to be next to each other and if they have them facing the VIP section like the last few years we will not be able to fit 600 teams worth of spectators to see both fields
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
Thinking more it could be worse to be in those seats for divisionals, you may have to clear seats for judges and wristbands teams, so do you watch your divisional finals from prime seats, or give that up to secure the best seats for Einstein? |
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
I like three of the four choices. Can we please change Tesla to someone who didn't push for the elimination of undesirables from the human race?
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
I'd love for us to qualify and get on the new Hopper or Carver Division :D
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
He even talks about robots: "I actually constructed "robots." Today the robot is an accepted fact, but the principle has not been pushed far enough. In the twenty-first century the robot will take the place which slave labor occupied in ancient civilization. There is no reason at all why most of this should not come to pass in less than a century, freeing mankind to pursue its higher aspirations." |
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
Of course, music would be obligatory AC/DC.... |
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
My team would flip if we got into Hopper. We even named a robot after her!
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
I was hoping for Ada Lovelace. Would be cool when our team from Byron got assigned to the Lovelace field. (Who can spot the connection first ? )
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
The choosing of Grace Hopper is interesting... I hope there aren't any BUGS (if you know your history, you'll get the joke). Does that mean there will be FRC libraries for COBAL now? :D
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
I really hope if we qualify for champs we get Hopper division. |
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
I like the selections but it would have been really nice if Lise Meitner had been honored. She should have won the Nobel prize for a variety of reasons not the least of which was that she was a Jewish female scientist doing work in Germany in the 1930's... didn't get the recognition she deserved.
I am happy that these four were honored as our field choices though. |
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Tesla PLEASE
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
First of all, a disclaimer: I'm an English major. Whether that excuses what follows, you be the judge. :)
FRC Championship Field Names to the tune of “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” You know Carson and Tesla and Newton and Carver Archimedes and Curie and Galileo and Hopper But do you recall The most famous scientist of all? Einstein, the white-haired thinker Had some very snowy hair And if you ever saw it, You’d be put off by its glare. All of the other students used to laugh and call him names They never let poor Einstein Join in any spelling games. Then one foggy darksome night, Thoughts just came his way Einstein with his hair so white Did some physics, saw the light. Then how the people loved him, Shouted out “E and MC! Einstein, the white-haired thinker, You’ll go down in history!” |
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
I kind of want von Braun to be a field name, but you know, people get butthurt over things that were done by the individual that were unrelated to his/her brilliance.
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
|
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Quote:
... quite a mature way of characterizing the thoughts of those that might disagree with you. |
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Hey cool, I proposed Rachel Carson in the last division naming thread (not claiming credit, but still proud to call it)
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...7&postcount=80 |
Re: FRC Blog - New Subdivision Names
Here's an amazing video on Grace Hopper from Nate Silver's fivethirtyeight.com. (The best data journalism site on the internet). So freaking cool.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-queen-of-code/ |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:36. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi