![]() |
Re: Talon sr, or SRX?
8 SRX on our robot this year. They're awesome, particularly cause of their small size. My only complaint is the permanent wires. It basically forces you to place your motor controllers next to the PDP unless you want to add connectors, and if any of these wires gets damaged enough, it bricks the controller. CAN is really cool but I don't think it's significantly better than PWM. I feel that there is no "better" controller between the SR and the SRX, they both have their advantages and their disadvantages.
|
Re: Talon sr, or SRX?
Quote:
|
Re: Talon sr, or SRX?
Quote:
|
Re: Talon sr, or SRX?
Quote:
The wires are repairable/replaceable. We got a beta Victor SP that was non-functional out of the box. All we had to do was open it up and solder the green wire onto its pad. |
Re: Talon sr, or SRX?
The SRXs have far nicer wiring; even if you're using them in PWM mode, the ability to daisy-chain the built-in wires of multiple controllers that receive identical signals (e.g. in a drive setup) is extremely convenient.
They're also smaller. |
Re: Talon sr, or SRX?
10 SRXs on the robot, of which we used 8 (4 drive, 2 lift, 2 intake). We used a limit switch wired to a breakout board on the Talon. We also sell the breakouts if anybody needs them.
We wired some SRs on our 2012 bot today, and I was surprised at how much larger they are. |
Re: Talon sr, or SRX?
SRX are awesome, because you can use their breakouts to connect encoders or limit switches. It makes your code lighter, and gives you more ports on the Rio. As an example, we'd use 8 PID subsystems with last year's talons. Now we have only one, because they are on closed loop.
TL:DR Talon SRX all the way |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi