Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   2 v 3 in Dallas (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=135295)

staplemonx 28-02-2015 19:40

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
Should this thread be 1 vs 3?

mwmac 28-02-2015 20:16

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
1v3 987 disabled as not set in time, 148 not on field in time.... semi 4

MariOlsen 28-02-2015 20:16

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by staplemonx (Post 1451224)
Should this thread be 1 vs 3?

Wow, and you said that even before SF 3 happened!

dodar 28-02-2015 20:17

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
1v3 in 2 straight semis

evand4567 28-02-2015 20:18

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
Does anyone know what specifically happened to make it a 1v3? It would stink if an alliance as good as #1 lost for this.

MariOlsen 28-02-2015 20:19

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mwmac (Post 1451232)
1v3 987 disabled 148 not on field in time.... semi 4

118 and 2613 didn't even make it to the field for semi 3. 624 still managed 95 points by themselves though.

eddie12390 28-02-2015 20:26

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kmodos (Post 1451196)
We were watching this when we all slowly noticed it. It seems kind of ungp in a way if 148 just told them not to put their bot on the field.

I seriously doubt that 148 (or any high-caliber team, for that matter) would ever tell another team to not put their robot in the field.

BBray_T1296 28-02-2015 20:26

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by evand4567 (Post 1451236)
Does anyone know what specifically happened to make it a 1v3? It would stink if an alliance as good as #1 lost for this.

As ruled:

148 didnt make the field in time.
987 took more than 60 seconds to set up.
Timeout wasn't called soon enough.

Sperkowsky 28-02-2015 20:27

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
edit- works on my laptop

Gregor 28-02-2015 20:27

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by btcshields6 (Post 1451221)
High Rollers 987 actually just sat this match out....Comm issues. Interesting. They're still on top, but what if that happens in finals?

Quote:

Originally Posted by mwmac (Post 1451232)
1v3 987 disabled as not set in time, 148 not on field in time.... semi 4

Quote:

Originally Posted by dodar (Post 1451234)
1v3 in 2 straight semis

Quote:

Originally Posted by MariOlsen (Post 1451237)
118 and 2613 didn't even make it to the field for semi 3. 624 still managed 95 points by themselves though.

Are the field crew being more strict with match times and setup times than they were earlier in the event.

It's very unusual to have this many teams missing their matches in eliminations.

If 987 had a problem with setting up in one minute, wouldn't it have been discovered before semi-finals.

Can anyone who's there chime in? Can't tell much from the stream.

BBray_T1296 28-02-2015 20:28

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by eddie12390 (Post 1451242)
I seriously doubt that 148 (or any high-caliber team, for that matter) would ever tell another team to not put their robot in the field.

They had the robot sidelined because they were manufacturing a 2 can grabber. Nothing ungp.

DohertyBilly 28-02-2015 20:28

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mwmac (Post 1451232)
1v3 987 disabled as not set in time, 148 not on field in time.... semi 4

The rule says "significant or repeated delays". Is 987 really taking that long to set up? I wouldn't imagine so...

Dunngeon 28-02-2015 20:36

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
I wonder if it has anything to do with the very extended nature of this event. Since Dallas is going so late, the refs may be trying to ensure the event concludes as quickly as possible...

Still would like to see things enforced uniformly, just so that no one has any surprises in playoffs.

Nuttyman54 28-02-2015 21:06

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunngeon (Post 1451251)
I wonder if it has anything to do with the very extended nature of this event. Since Dallas is going so late, the refs may be trying to ensure the event concludes as quickly as possible...

Still would like to see things enforced uniformly, just so that no one has any surprises in playoffs.

Consistent enforcement would be great. At PNW Auburn Teams were asked to not revert robots to transport config in playoffs to speed up match turnaround. The teams were not taking over 60 seconds, but the field crew wanted to move faster. They started requesting this on Friday night when we were 2 hours behind

Jacob Bendicksen 28-02-2015 21:12

Re: 2 v 3 in Dallas
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nuttyman54 (Post 1451262)
Consistent enforcement would be great. At PNW Auburn Teams were asked to not revert robots to transport config in playoffs to speed up match turnaround. The teams were not taking over 60 seconds, but the field crew wanted to move faster. They started requesting this on Friday night when we were 2 hours behind

The refs and field crew at PNW Oregon City pretty much said 'if it's safe, don't worry about transport config' the entire time, including quals and playoffs. We were about 2 hours behind on Friday even with that, though...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi