Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Scouting (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   1114 the Statistical Outlier (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=135689)

lcoreyl 20-03-2015 14:43

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathan Streeter (Post 1460118)
After a fair number of teams came somewhat close to 1114's 143pt QA from GTRC... making them look not-quite-so-outlier-defining, it's looking like they will have a QA of around 200pt at Waterloo!

Mind = blown

If they indeed get a 200pt average that would be crazy. Let's not forget that their current average is paired with 2056 twice and 5406 once making this more of an eliminations looking average...

one4robots 25-03-2015 16:18

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gdeaver (Post 1456741)
We have not yet seen the platform RC wars.

Note sure if it was Quarterfinals Match 2, Semi-finals Match 2 or Finals Match 1 of Wisconsin Regional, but 2530 stole a can right off 3418s plunger above the step. One of the most epic moves in 2530 history.

The RC wars HAVE begun!:yikes:

JamesCH95 25-03-2015 16:29

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by one4robots (Post 1462167)
Note sure if it was Quarterfinals Match 2, Semi-finals Match 2 or Finals Match 1 of Wisconsin Regional, but 2530 stole a can right off 3418s plunger above the step. One of the most epic moves in 2530 history.

The RC wars HAVE begun!:yikes:

138 pulled a can out of our gripper in GSDE in week 1! ;)

We've been working to counter that move since...

Caleb Sykes 25-03-2015 16:30

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by one4robots (Post 1462167)
Note sure if it was Quarterfinals Match 2, Semi-finals Match 2 or Finals Match 1 of Wisconsin Regional, but 2530 stole a can right off 3418s plunger above the step. One of the most epic moves in 2530 history.

The RC wars HAVE begun!:yikes:

I'll admit, I haven't seen any video from Wisconsin, but whatever you did there, I have trouble imagining that it's any more epic, or more inconceivable, than this.

Citrus Dad 25-03-2015 18:46

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
After 4 weeks, based on the "net OPR" (minus Coop OPR), 1114 is now 8.79 standard deviations (SD) above the mean OPR. The previous high was 6.53 for 1114 in 2008. Only one other team has been above 6 at season's end.

But that skew doesn't stop with just one team here's the number of teams more than 5 and 4 SDs above the mean by year. Cumulatively, only 8 teams have ever been above 5 SD before; now we have 6 teams. And in the years with 6 teams above 4 SD, there were either 1 or 0 above 5.

SD 5 4
2015 6 10
2014 0 3
2013 2 3
2012 1 6
2011 0 6
2010 4 3
2009 0 1
2008 1 3

artK 25-03-2015 19:53

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Citrus Dad (Post 1462216)
After 4 weeks, based on the "net OPR" (minus Coop OPR), 1114 is now 8.79 standard deviations (SD) above the mean OPR. The previous high was 6.53 for 1114 in 2008. Only one other team has been above 6 at season's end.

But that skew doesn't stop with just one team here's the number of teams more than 5 and 4 SDs above the mean by year. Cumulatively, only 8 teams have ever been above 5 SD before; now we have 6 teams. And in the years with 6 teams above 4 SD, there were either 1 or 0 above 5.

I suspect that those number of teams above 4 and 5 SDs for 2015 will go down come champs when more high scoring teams start playing more matches together.

Did you use Ed Law's spreadsheets for all of these numbers?

Dragonking 25-03-2015 21:03

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
This is also due to the fact that frc is growing faster than ever and there is a wider possible point spread than many years.

Nathan Streeter 25-03-2015 23:16

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by artK (Post 1462232)
I suspect that those number of teams above 4 and 5 SDs for 2015 will go down come champs when more high scoring teams start playing more matches together.

Did you use Ed Law's spreadsheets for all of these numbers?

Good teams playing together should have a very small impact on OPR... it seems about as likely to slightly decrease or stagnate after Week 6 or 7 as it is to increase. Teams can't easily double scoring contribution during auto (if you have two 3-tote-autos in the same qual match) and have to work harder to double teleop scoring... (i.e., have to work to get more cans off the step, easy to eat through the landfill, etc.). Then there's obviously the issue of field congestion.

Regardless, having high scoring teams together shouldn't impact OPR... OPR should 'filter' all that out. Obviously QAs will continue to rise to be higher and higher.

Citrus Dad 26-03-2015 17:14

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by artK (Post 1462232)
I suspect that those number of teams above 4 and 5 SDs for 2015 will go down come champs when more high scoring teams start playing more matches together.

Did you use Ed Law's spreadsheets for all of these numbers?

Yes, used Ed's spreadsheet.

I did these calculations at 2 weeks, but didn't post them, then went back to 4 weeks since all of the strongest teams have played by now. While there might be some compression at Champs, the gap is enormous right now and unlike any previous year.

As to the expansion of FRC, note that the SDs have not been steadily expanding with growth (which makes sense when looking at unitless distribution measures). In fact the years with the next greatest skews are in 2010 and 2008. This whole year looks like its an outlier, not just one team.

Ichlieberoboter 26-03-2015 23:21

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
Their average at Waterloo for quals was 183.3. They then formed an alliance with the second team who had an average of 174.4. Scores off the charts. Mind officially blown. :ahh:

nuclearnerd 27-03-2015 09:45

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Citrus Dad (Post 1462216)
But that skew doesn't stop with just one team here's the number of teams more than 5 and 4 SDs above the mean by year. Cumulatively, only 8 teams have ever been above 5 SD before; now we have 6 teams. And in the years with 6 teams above 4 SD, there were either 1 or 0 above 5.

As a visual person, I would love to see overlapping histograms of the OPRs for all of the years that Ed has spreadsheets for. It would be useful to have a sort of "gini index" for different years. The chart should show if there is a trend towards more skewed performances, or if it's a game specific thing. I'd worry that a long-term trend of this kind would start to turn "inspiring" into "discouraging". I'll try to make the chart when I get some time, unless someone beats me to it.

Disclaimer: I am in slobbering love with Simbot Sideswipe, and I'm not calling foul over their accomplishment. I'm just interested in the meta trends of FRC, and their impact on the sustainability of the sport.

Citrus Dad 27-03-2015 17:34

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nuclearnerd (Post 1462665)
As a visual person, I would love to see overlapping histograms of the OPRs for all of the years that Ed has spreadsheets for. It would be useful to have a sort of "gini index" for different years. The chart should show if there is a trend towards more skewed performances, or if it's a game specific thing. I'd worry that a long-term trend of this kind would start to turn "inspiring" into "discouraging". I'll try to make the chart when I get some time, unless someone beats me to it.

Disclaimer: I am in slobbering love with Simbot Sideswipe, and I'm not calling foul over their accomplishment. I'm just interested in the meta trends of FRC, and their impact on the sustainability of the sport.

I have a couple of charts done already but I haven't had time to load them up here--it's trickier than on other websites.

The skew appears to be game specific and not a trend. The games that seem to get the highest praise on CD have the lowest skew.

nuclearnerd 27-03-2015 17:41

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Citrus Dad (Post 1462809)
I have a couple of charts done already but I haven't had time to load them up here--it's trickier than on other websites.

Try uploading them to a 3rd party site (Flickr, Dropbox, Google drive, imgur) and posting a link. Otherwise, to upload to Chief you have to go here:http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/upload/

Karthik 29-03-2015 12:37

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by philso (Post 1456799)
Yes, it would be hugely educational and inspirational for the community (and greatly appreciated) if someone from 1114 could describe the various design options they considered, the decisions they made and the reasoning behind their decisions. Some of us have already been speculating on various topics in one of the other threads and would love to know what the real deal is.

As you requested. :)

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...89#post1463289

Citrus Dad 30-03-2015 14:09

Re: 1114 the Statistical Outlier
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nuclearnerd (Post 1462815)
Try uploading them to a 3rd party site (Flickr, Dropbox, Google drive, imgur) and posting a link. Otherwise, to upload to Chief you have to go here:http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/upload/

Thanks, did it and waiting for approval.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:41.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi