![]() |
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
Quote:
|
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
Quote:
I think it would be in your best interest to watch video of 3310 please. |
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
Looks like we can all enjoy our Cheesecake once again:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
Quote:
Your robot wouldn't move fast enough to "collide with it" Edit: It's been reversed! |
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
For anyone wondering, this seems to be the key phrase in the updated R17 rule.
Quote:
|
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
Thanks for the change, Frank. Now I can build a complete robot out of the withholding allowances of 4 other teams.
|
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
Good guy Frank at it again. So refreshing to see FIRST actually listen to feedback from the community and take action on it!
As Paul Copioli pointed out in another thread, this would have been unheard of a few years ago. The change is night and day and very welcome. |
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
Next topic: Cannolis and water games...
|
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
Hats off to FIRST for listening to the community's concerns and for having the courage to reverse themselves.
There are troubling issues and situations no matter which way FIRST ruled here. I like that Frank acknowledged that in his message. I respect this. Thanks Frank. Dr. Joe J. |
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
This is a big win for #teamcheesecake
And when cheesecake wins, everybody wins. Thanks Frank! -Mike |
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
Only issue I have is it specifically says withholding allowance and not all legal parts. If I made something during build season and bagged it, within the current rules I can't give it away. That's probably just an oversight but an annoying one.
Thanks Frank, and everyone else at FIRST that was involved in this decision. I'm sure there was a lot of debate and I feel like this is the right response. |
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
I know we can each agree to disagree with either the original answer or the update or both if you so choose. But I'd wager that it's hard to argue against the process the GDC went through for this situation: listening (well, presumably mostly reading) the arguments in this controversy and discussing it with the humility to reverse themselves and the respectfulness to explain it. Whether or not you regard the reversal as an improvement, kudos to everyone in this thread and any other channels for the patience and passion you put towards this community's continuous improvement effort. I say we've got another excellence precedent.
#FrankforPresident #FrankAnswers |
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
|
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
No! I demand peak absurdity!
|
Re: Dangerous precedent set by Q&A 461: Loaning Parts/Assemblies to other teams
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi