![]() |
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
Quote:
|
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
Ok, I know I'll get beat up for this one but at least I'll get it off my chest. A tether must be a real tether and not a piece of string. In my world, a tether in a robotics competition is a device that connects one device to another for data communication between the two. It is not a rope or chain used purely to restrict movement. There, I feel better now.
|
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
Quote:
|
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
Quote:
|
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
Much discussion on playoff structure.
I disagree with the assertion that W-L-T only works for Finals in this game; that said, I agree that the playoff structure tends to advance the better alliance. Therefore, I prefer the this year's structure; very much, in fact. If the lowest score were to be dropped (and I am not in favor of that), then a third match needs to be added in the Quarter Final round. And that would add 25ish minutes to the playoffs. Not my first choice, but something I could support. |
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
Quote:
|
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
Quote:
|
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
I agree, get rid of the playoff structure!
|
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
What about a compromise that I've seen work (I know bowling in 8th grade Gym worked like this) where it is WLT played in a round robin format. In that it's round robin in terms of who plays who, but it's WLT in terms of initial ranking calculations. With such a small pool of alliances there will be ties, but those could be resolved using highest score (or average of best scores or the like).
Again, any changes would probably be a PITA to implement (unless FMS is given some sort of an option to change the structure), but in terms of "aspects that have a lot of hate" the playoff format is certainly up there. |
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
i think this is impossible but allow for defence
|
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
Quote:
Keep the step and put a 2012 bridge on each side. End game come back. |
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
Over all I would just like to see the opportunity for higher scoring matches. Maybe add more cans?
|
Okay while we are on the topic of IRI, I have what may be a stupid question. So we are a younger team, going on 5 years, last year we talked about going to IRI, but didn't make it. So this year we are trying to make it happen. We had a few questions. Do the standard first rules apply usually? Such as robot dimensions and robot weight? From reading this thread it seems like the game is subject to change, we were wondering mostly about weight. Thanks!
|
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
Quote:
But I wouldn't plan on having those five pounds just yet. Wait until rule changes are official. |
Re: IRI - 2015 Rule Modification Ideas?
Quote:
As everyone is assumed to have passed inspection at an official FRC event, any inspections at IRI are very informal. Weight is not normally checked unless something seems obviously too heavy, and usually there's a bit of leeway given (typically an extra five pounds) to accommodate teams that have made modifications but don't have access to a good scale. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:20. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi