![]() |
Future First Championship News
From: http://www.usfirst.org/aboutus/2017-...p-announcement
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Video announcement from Don Bossi
|
Re: Future First Championship News
2 Woodie Flowers Award winners!
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Why stop here? Cancel all regionals, cancel all districts, let's have 12 (or more) World Championships!
Better yet, skip the event, and crown every team a world champion! |
Re: Future First Championship News
Some people would say this is different.
That is one word for it. |
Re: Future First Championship News
This just feels weird. It's not really "the" world championship anymore. If a team wins, can they say the were "the" world champions? Or are they just "the world champions among the teams in the regions close to them"?
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Splitting FRC into 2 events does more damage to its integrity as a sport than anything else possibly could. This absolutely cannot be the case if they want people to take it seriously.
|
Re: Future First Championship News
The location choices are lnteresting. not sure it's going to save my team any money. Both Houston and Detriot are out of the question in terms of driving distance from SC. I miss having the championship in my backyard.
|
Re: Future First Championship News
"Presenting your 2017 Half-World Champions" doesn't have quite the same ring to it...
|
Re: Future First Championship News
If FIRST wants more FRC teams to experience a "Championship" event, expand the district system. Let the bulk of teams get their "Championship" experience at the district championship level. Keep one central location for a world championship. I really don't like this.
|
Re: Future First Championship News
This makes no sense. The biggest groups of teams are spread from minnesota to NE, and then on the West Coast. Why put an event in Texas, which is much further away. If you are going to add a second champs, put it west of the rockies somewhere. That way you actually save teams money. Or just keep 1 championship event...
|
Re: Future First Championship News
http://www.usfirst.org/aboutus/2017-...p-announcement
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
As we try to improve the quality of our team, we spend a lot of time looking at the teams who have built effective programs, and what makes them tick. And a common trend, perhaps above all others, is a relentless pursuit of being the best in the world. It builds dominant, inspiring robots, and it builds quality experiences for students.
Not exactly thrilled that the motivation that drives the programs which move FIRST forward has been taken down a couple notches. Whatever happened to that "super regional" model which was floating around for a while? I imagined that these events would rise to a prestige and experience quality level near that of the championship, while maintaining a central goal to work towards? |
Re: Future First Championship News
I'm confused why they aren't implementing super regional events like FTC does. 2 WC events is going to be harmful to the overall quality of this program.
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Who is going to be the first team to be a true World Champion in the 2 championship era by winning both?
|
Re: Future First Championship News
I think this take's a lot away from what Champs is all about. Your competing with the best of the best in the entire world in one place. You get to meet with thousands of people who love FIRST the same way you do, you get to meet your friends from different coasts and trade shirts, you have the ability to be the WORLD champions, and get to see those robots that have been winning all their events. Splitting it into 2 different champs would eliminate all of that.
There would be no world champions, you would never meet your favorite team on the other side of the world, the competition would go down severely. This just does not seem like a good idea and I would LOVE to hear the discussion when they decided this was a good idea. Because right now I believe the cons are out weighing the pros. |
Re: Future First Championship News
I do not like this one bit. With the incorporation of the districts, that should be used to reduce the number of teams that qualify for Worlds while giving teams an additional exciting event. This idea is going to kill the excitement and climax of the "World Championships". I really hope that FIRST reconsiders the structure of this or adds one more event for the Champions of the two events to compete against one another. I have been a huge supporter of FIRST and what they have done for students around the world. While the impact on the students will not be changed, the competitive environment will definitely be altered and greatly tarnished.
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
I feel like this is a step backwards for the program. More teams should be going into the district model with district championships so teams get the experience that way with the best of the best moving on to the singular world championship. Just my two cents... |
Re: Future First Championship News
Really sad news. I get that we are trying to reach more students, but this seems like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
|
Re: Future First Championship News
"While FIRST appreciates teams’ enthusiasm for attending either or both Championship celebrations, our goal is to enable as many teams and students as possible to experience a FIRST Championship. Based on geographic location, teams from all four programs will be assigned to attend one of the events."
Does this mean that my team, being closer to Detroit, will no longer get an opportunity to compete with every single team that's geographically closer to Houston? I think this is a terrible idea. Part of the draw of CMP is it being a gathering of friends and competitors from around the country and the world. These new events aren't world championships. They're glorified "super-regionals." |
Re: Future First Championship News
This poses some interesting questions. Will one championship event be "better" to attend than the other? If one of the main points is to reduce travel costs, it is an easy statement that any teams from Texas who qualify for Worlds will go to the Houston CMP, while anyone from Canada or FiM will probably find themselves in Detroit. I feel like this could produce an OPR discrepency. Perhaps this could be leveled by the divvying of teams such as MAR and West Coast teams whose costs may be similar between both events.
Also, will there be a "grand champion" matchup where the Houston champion and STL/Detroit champion alliances face off for an ultimate crown? I feel like this division sets a precedent for future-proofing the whole competition organization. Sudden increase in teams in Europe? Put a CMP there. Number of teams on the West Coast quadruple? Put a CMP there. It is possible that this introduces another tier of competition where, like all the districts feed their district champs, those district champs feed poly-district champs, which ultimately feed another, higher WCMP level. |
Re: Future First Championship News
If they're going that far north, does this mean Toronto might actually get the Championships at some point? I really have no clue what to say about this, other than that this means IRI and similar offseason events will be determining actual world champions now.
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
I'm certain FIRST will be listening to teams and their ideas on how to define the new championship structure.
Keep the feedback constructive and let's help grow the program to new heights. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
I'm not sure I really understand the motivation behind this decision. |
Re: Future First Championship News
It says in the release that teams are region locked. How is geographically restricting teams fostering exchange of ideas between teams from different states or even countries.
Now when my students want to go study and look at an 1114 or 254 robot they may never get the chance? Ridiculous. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
...maybe there'll be an Einstein regional... :ahh: :ahh: |
Re: Future First Championship News
This is also almost guaranteed to conflict the VEX World Championship nearly every year from now on unless VEX bends over backwards to not conflict, which they already went out of their way to do this year with only one FIRST Championship event.
|
Re: Future First Championship News
This move makes absolutely no sense to me. Splitting the teams up into two events will, in my opinion, do the opposite of inspire people. And don't even get me started on crowning two world champions.
|
Re: Future First Championship News
"IRI - Where True Champions are Crowned"
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Will we only ever get to see hall of fame teams from our half-world now?
On the plus side, this could make IRI the "true" championship. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
What I will say is that FIRST recognized there is a problem with Championships. It's an event every team should go to at least once because just being there is a transformative experience, and by the time we move to this format, probably around 1/6 of teams would have had a chance to go to champs at the FRC level.
That's ignoring the fact that the other programs have no room at all to invite teams to compete in such a great environment. I am not convinced this was the best solution that could be executed, but we as a program need to keep trying new things together and figuring out what works and what doesn't together. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Well, this will be interesting.
|
Re: Future First Championship News
FIRST, April Fool's Day was 8 days ago. This isn't funny.
I'm sorry, but this is honestly the dumbest idea FIRST has ever put forth; yes, even more so than Lunacy. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
Having just agonized over declining a wait list position for 2015 this excites me very much to know that I have a better shot of having my team attend championships in the future! |
Re: Future First Championship News
"Two championships reduces travel costs for teams."
So they put one north and one south instead of east/west? Go figure. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Most of my thoughts have been expressed by others, but it's interesting how FIRST didn't even see how this year's Championship with its new model went before announcing this change.
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
So....
Inaugural Vex Pro Competition in 2017?!? |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
My favorite part of the Championship event is the chance to see robots and teams from around the world. This move, to my eye, seems to dilute and degrade the Championship experience instead of opening it up to more teams. I'm not sure that splitting the FIRST community in two is a good idea.
And ditto all the mentions of two world champion alliances, it was difficult enough trying to explain splitting a title three ways. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Can we say money grab? Its like the NFL expanding playoffs...lets have over half the teams make it and make more money.
Its sickening. People in FRC should respond to this complete farce. |
Re: Future First Championship News
From a, 'response to the growth of FIRST programs' this change makes sense.
But from the FRC perspective, it makes absolutely no sense. But it's such a tricky issue with the areas that have absolutely no easy way to switch to districts in the time being. We'll see how this plays out, but I'd assume everything's already set and booked...not the best way to go about this...FIRST should have proposed the idea of splitting Championship geographically (ie. when they announced expanded 2015 champs or continued STL champs), wait for the reaction, then proceed from there. If they announced the venues, then clearly they're at a phase where legally, this can't be changed. Unless they (and please, please, please let this be the end solution) split championship by program. Don't make FRC (FIRST's premier program) suffer it's own growth due to other FIRST programs growing. I don't view the awards change as 'giving every team a championship', but I'm not a fan of the huge amount of awards that will be given out, ie. two CCAs. Also, as much as we're negative about it here on the FRC-side, I'm curious to see what FTC/FLL people think about it, because their opinions do matter; it's a FIRST-focused change |
Re: Future First Championship News
FIRST Championship 2020 Motto: You get a championship, you get a championship, you get a championship!
Maybe FIRST is trying to slowly announce Oprah is taking over for Dean. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Wow... what a terrible plan. Why not just go the FTC route with super regional then champs? Also while I get the point of Detroit with all of the teams in MI and Quebec, but Houston? Really? Not a west coast city like LA or SD or Seattle?
Edit "Constructive Feedback": Why not have 3 super regionals at Detroit, LA and Orlando with ~240 teams each. Then using district like point system send ~120 teams to a real world champs in Houston. |
Re: Future First Championship News
I wasn't at Champs last year, but I was in 2011 -- and i do remember it being very crowded. And this year, there are even more teams. I think that making a change is good. That said, I'm not sure this is the right way to do it.
The district system is great because it allows you to go to "regionals," and then a (district) championship. I like this system because it gives teams an opportunity to compete multiple times, and then attend a championship event, which could qualify them for the FRC World Championship. What I don't like about this new layout, is that FIRST is now moving into an even more district-like system, but without the championship part. We now have the winners of district championships (and regionals) competing at two "Super Regionals" that have no ending championship. You instead end up with a set of winners from different sides of the globe, and don't know if 1114 or 254 (just an example) really is better than the other in a given year. What FIRST should do, if they plan to follow through with this new format, is move these regional championships slightly sooner, and have a true world championship event afterward, even if it means fewer teams. I know I, and my team, are inspired by seeing the greatest robots each year competing, even if it is from home. The world champs could be smaller, but with all the presentation sessions streamed online. I feel that FIRST could embrace technology and really make the championships even better for all teams. Just because your team isn't competing at champs doesn't mean you can't learn a lot from watching it all -- and we're at a point today where we can use technology to bring all the action back home to teams very easily. (Sorry this got so long...) |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
I umm...I just...I don't get it...
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
I'm really surprised the FIRST apologists aren't out in force on this one.
Or are even they disillusioned by this? |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Some things to think about.
1. An event can get too big for any one city to support, hotel-wise. 2. Recruiting enough volunteers for our style of event in one city can be an issue. I know I've been hit up several times to sign up to volunteer at champs. 3. Having >1 champs is consistent with FIRST's mission around reach 4. This could be a first step toward a multi-tier playoff model leading back to a single championship in the future. 5. There's nothing about this that can't be changed back to a single event in 2021. At that point, though, you'll have teams used to 1000ish slots for Champs and complaints that it reduces access. 6. Having 2 events does increase the number of teams within driving distance, particularly the DET event. The west coast would not be a logical second location, if you are using driving distance as your metric. If the model is successful, I'd expect a championship in California to follow. Houston is a curious choice for the second location if you use transportation costs as a metric; I'm wondering whether there were facility availability reasons for that, as 2017 not very far away in the world of venue scheduling. 7. I could see 1,000 spots for champs in 2017 (600 in STL and 400 in DET) 8. I'm glad that they're willing to try something new, even if in the end it turns out to be less successful than expected. |
Re: Future First Championship News
This change benefits FLL and FTC more than FRC. In my opinion, this will be a good change because it will allow for more FLL and FTC teams to attend. The number of FRC teams able to attend FIRST Championships is outrageous compared to the number of FLL and FTC teams combined.
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
I was waiting for a late April Fools...
This is just not right. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
You want to burn out key volunteers? This is how you burn out key volunteers.
I don't get the whole "geographic convenience" thing - sounds more like an excuse than an actual fact - my costs, coming from California, certainly won't be going down any. Frankly, if they were shooting for geography, they should've gone east-west. While I'm excited that more teams will be able to participate, I thought that was what the 8 divisions was for. Did we outgrow that model before it even had a chance to show itself? |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
Also St. Louis/Houston are both much warmer than Detroit =( |
Re: Future First Championship News
Well, I can only hope that we qualify for the last real world championship (for now)...
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
By time we've booked a coach bus, hotel room and insurance the cost difference between going to St.Louis and Detroit isn't huge. Rather than spending resources on creating a 2nd champs FIRST should put those resources into lowering the cost of competing with programs like districts. Would teams really rather go to one event and "half champs" than 2 events, a intermediate champs and full champs?
|
Re: Future First Championship News
One of the best parts of Champs this year is that I get to see and compete with my old team. See friends, old mentors, teams I used to compete against. Beginning in 2017, that can't happen...
And why Detroit? Michigan already has a State Championship. Those that were in Houston in 2003, everything I had heard was it was awful. I wasn't there. Has the area changed much in the past 12 years? |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
Its ridiculous the amount of money the average first team needs to raise to go to more than one event including a new diluted championship. Regardless of what the non-profit does with it. There's common sense. Lower costs if they go this route...yet we all know that will not happen. Someone gets that money sure isn't FRC teams. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
I hate this.
I hate this so much. Never have I ever questioned my involvement in this program more than I have now. Taking the community and slicing it in half may have benefits, but they are absolutely outweighed by the negatives. I don't even know where to begin. I hope this nonsense is short lived. Otherwise, I'll be finding a different program to invest my time in. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Out of the things I have seen in this thread, most people are opposed to this change because of the competition aspect. People like competition, and they want to crown a champion.
That's great, but does that line up with FIRST's vision? I don't think so. If you need a reminder, FIRST's vision is: "To transform our culture by creating a world where science and technology are celebrated and where young people dream of becoming science and technology leaders." If that means making it more accessible to more students by making two championships, so be it. From what I've seen, FIRST really isn't very concerned with the drawbacks that this system has in regards to competition. They feel like Champs is a totally unique experience, and the more kids that go experience it, the better they fulfil their mission. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
2017 will be GRB , Minute Maid & Toyota Center The hate and anger needs to slow down in this thread. Think constructive not destructive criticism. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Well, I guess I now understand how the Georgia teams felt when Championships left Atlanta. I'm going to miss being able to go every year as a volunteer and spectator. When I do go it's going to be a lot more expensive and require more vacation days, and I'm going to have to pick which half of the world I want to see playing, since there's no way I can afford the vacation time or the travel costs of going to both.
I really dislike the idea of my team being cut off from half the teams in the world with whatever the geographic border ends up being. We're about equidistant from Detroit and Houston, so I can't guess which way we'll get assigned. There are so many amazing team combinations that will never be possible at a regular-season event again -- for example, the Texas and FIM powerhouses will never see each other before off-season events. I understand that Championships has turned into a city-melter in terms of event logistics/hotel space/etc, and I am somewhat sympathetic to wanting to get more teams to championships, particularly for FTC/FLL; however, I think this is going to reduce the quality of the FRC event substantially. Initial reaction: :( |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
I would much rather have gone the Super Regional --> World Championship route...
![]() |
Re: Future First Championship News
So basically... FRC now stands for FIRST Robotics Convention
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Can we start a petition against this?
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
I guess teams should be looking forward to more Recycle Rush type games if this attitude is what the GDC and FIRST staff have in mind for FRC now. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Was this video previously released on April 1st?
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
We remain committed to supporting the FIRST Robotics Competition and FRC Teams everywhere. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
I really wish that FIRST would have asked for feedback before signing the contracts.
At this point, it is probably too late for anything to change. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
What happened to this, and has it ever been discussed that this wasn't the plan (until now)? |
Re: Future First Championship News
This is a real step backward. This means that teams from NE and such will be unable to physically contact those in the West and make it virtually impossible to crown a real champion.
|
Re: Future First Championship News
I dont like this at all:
1. being in CT we can't even afford to go to st. louis, so yes detroit is slightly closer to us, but is it close enough to really make a difference in cost. probably not. 2. if we do go to championship in detroit, chances are ill never be able to see 148, 118, possibly even 254 at an event. 3. championship is best out of the best. would basketball have an east coast championship playoff and a separate westcoast playoff. declaring two champions.... absolutely not then the questions is going to arise who is truly the best robot in the WORLD the west coast team or the east coast team. from a fan's perspective who has no knowledge of first what are they going to think of this? 2012 the last year we went to championship was one of the best event of my life, not because of the location, but because we were able to walk around see teams from all over the world, and how their teams differ from ours. And the fact we were able to be nationally ranked among the top team in the world. finally they are concerned about getting more teams to go, but do all the teams deserve to go. Yes it would be great for the students to gain the experience but would the championship then be the best of the best, do all 32 nfl teams make it to the playoffs no. so im not sure how i feel about this seems like a 2nd mistake. |
Re: Future First Championship News
People asking why we don't add an intermediary level of comeptition between R/SCMP and WCMP must not be raising money for their team's registration fees.
I could see a Super Regional/World Championship setup working if World Champs goes down to a 150 team event in the summer, like a super IRI, and FIRST works out a deal with a sponsor (or broadcaster?) to eliminate registration fees. Take all 16 Super Regional Winners, all 4 Championship Chairman's Award Finalists, the top 120 teams not in these categories, and the last 10 go to something like top 10 rookies or HoF teams. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
Trying to be constructive: I feel that a better move that would achieve the stated goals of this change (more access to better events, bigger FIRST events in more cities, etc.) would be to add intermediary levels between regionals and the championships (many people mentioned district champs as that level). This gives more people more access to quality events but still keeps the prestige and inspiration of a Championship. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
FIRST is 80% of why I even have friends around the country and internationally, and now if I want to see them I'd have to set aside 2 weekends plus whatever else I'm mentoring and volunteering for? Good grief.
On top of this, you only become the best of the half of whatever first deems you the best of. I don't like the split, I don't like the doubling down on awards, and I don't like how much of a hassle this will be. At what point do they announce which championship you get to go to? A lot of teams, mine included, set aside plans in the fall on where we would stay, how much it'll cost, and how we're going to get to the Championships. Now that we potentially have to create 2 separate plans, one possibly costing more, would be such a pain. At the very least, since one "Championship" is a week ahead of the other, what're the chances they could bring the winning alliance from that one to the one after for a crowning match? |
Re: Future First Championship News
I can't describe how disappointing this announcement is.
Based on the geographic assignments outlined in the FAQ section, basically I won't be at a World Championship with the incredible teams on the West Coast and Midwest / Mountain Region ever again. FIRST claims they are doing this to give more kids "the Championship experience." What is the Championship experience exactly? For me, it's seeing the best robots and learning from those teams from all over the World. That's it. Now I won't see half of the best teams and instead will see more average teams. I'm sorry but that ruins the Championship event for me. 2 Different sets of World Champions that never play each other? Multiple Chairman's Award? I agree with Adam. Lets just call every event a World Championship and be done with it. In other news, everyone leaves with one of these! ![]() Quote:
|
Re: Future First Championship News
I'm not just upset, I'm disappointed. Things were looking so good for a while. Frank was my hero because it sounded like he was on the same page as us. Why did this change happen out of nowhere?
So disappointed. There is no energy like the energy at World Champs. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Noooooo! :eek: Atlanta mayor/GA governor why? Fingers crossed for 2019 :(
|
Re: Future First Championship News
I love how all of us came together and are trashing how bad this decision actually is.
Hopefully, FIRST realizes the same. |
Re: Future First Championship News
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi