Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Robot Showcase (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136594)

lpickett 14-04-2015 15:18

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
1987 is the best robot not going. They would do well with one that can cap their stacks. They only missed by one point going to elimination rounds at Buckeye. I was heartbroken watching that match. I can only hope and pray they will get invited from the waitlist.

Kellen Hill 14-04-2015 15:42

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
I'd like to cast a vote for 283. Only saw them play at Peachtree, but they were highly capable of putting up two capped six stacks by themselves from the HP. And highly deserving of being the number one overall pick by 1319.

ThunderousPrime 14-04-2015 17:19

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThunderousPrime (Post 1470827)
Team List for those interested: (Will update as the thread progresses)

25
177
179
283
334
456
696
846
865
868
1126
1287
1507
1657
1731
1987
2077
2102
2175
2194
2472
2485
2509
3055
3117
3230
3299
3883
4500
4539
4655
4859
4917
5172

jajabinx124 14-04-2015 17:33

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
3276 had a good performance this year(Awesome landfill bot). They were picked 1st overall at Lake superior.

forbes 14-04-2015 17:36

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jared Russell (Post 1470831)
This will be a strange Championship without team 25.

Looks like 25 just got added from the wait list.

Thad House 14-04-2015 17:42

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by forbes (Post 1470919)
Looks like 25 just got added from the wait list.

Actually the declines have finally been updated in the system, so teams from NE, MAR and FIM are getting added as teams above them decline their invitations.

Looks like 3 declines in MAR, 7 in NE and 1 in FIM.

CaityDawh 14-04-2015 19:29

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
1987's robot can make 5 stacks of 6, but not capped. If they get picked from the wait list and are put in a division with a team that can consistently cap 6 stacks, noodle or no noddle, and can grab containers from the step. They will be a terrifying alliance to compete against. Especially if they can also get a team that is a landfill bot and can create several uncapped stacks on the platform not used by 1987.

Another amazing team that isn't going to worlds is 67. If I am not mistaken. They were knocked out of Quarter-finals at the Michigan District Championship. After winning both of the District Events they attended. And an average score of 126.83.

That is the sad thing about Districts. Amazing teams that deserve to go to worlds have a harder time getting there, as they have to score high in the point system to make it to the championship then they have to either win, get chairman's or get E.I.

TDav540 14-04-2015 19:31

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CaityDawh (Post 1470949)
Another amazing team that isn't going to worlds is 67. If I am not mistaken. They were knocked out of Quarter-finals at the Michigan District Championship. After winning both of the District Events they attended. And an average score of 126.83.

67 is an HOF team, so they should be qualified to go.

Chris_Ely 14-04-2015 19:31

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CaityDawh (Post 1470949)
Another amazing team that isn't going to worlds is 67. If I am not mistaken. They were knocked out of Quarter-finals at the Michigan District Championship. After winning both of the District Events they attended. And an average score of 126.83.

67 is going to worlds. They are a Hall of Fame team, and they finished 10th in FiM.
http://frc-districtrankings.usfirst.org/FIM/67

Link07 14-04-2015 19:36

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Thad House (Post 1470920)
Actually the declines have finally been updated in the system, so teams from NE, MAR and FIM are getting added as teams above them decline their invitations.

Looks like 3 declines in MAR, 7 in NE and 1 in FIM.

I believe there were only 2 declines from MAR (316 + 272)

EDIT: I stand corrected.

MrTechCenter 14-04-2015 19:37

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CaityDawh (Post 1470949)

That is the sad thing about Districts. Amazing teams that deserve to go to worlds have a harder time getting there, as they have to score high in the point system to make it to the championship then they have to either win, get chairman's or get E.I.

I'm pretty sure districts makes it EASIER for good teams to qualify.

jajabinx124 14-04-2015 19:48

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MrTechCenter (Post 1470955)
I'm pretty sure districts makes it EASIER for good teams to qualify.

Agreed. This is why MN is so underrepresented at champs without the districts system.

Broboraider 14-04-2015 19:50

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Link07 (Post 1470954)
I believe there were only 2 declines from MAR (316 + 272)

4285 also declined their invite

dodar 14-04-2015 19:58

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jajabinx124 (Post 1470963)
Agreed. This is why MN is so underrepresented at champs without the districts system.

Well another reason is also that they lost 5/12 regional champ spots from their own regionals.

jajabinx124 14-04-2015 20:05

Re: Best Robots Not To Qualify for Champs
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dodar (Post 1470967)
Well another reason is also that they lost 5/12 regional champ spots from their own regionals.

True. Some non-MN teams did win at MN regionals. Even if those 5 slots did go to MN teams MN would still be underrepresented. Also keep in mind some of those slots were made up because teams like 525 and 2826 gave wildcards to the finalist alliances they faced as well.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:01.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi