![]() |
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
if anyone's interested, I compiled together OPR data (from 955's website http://team955.org/opr/?search=global ) with my own analysis of video from TBA (when available) to make this spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing
this has info on who's landfill, feeder, who can do both can burglars, 3 tote autos, etc. It ain't perfect, but it's a start, and means you don't have to watch a ton of video to come up with some game theory (I really wanted an excuse to put off my Calculus homework) |
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
They look good - but not as good as you are suggesting. Yes, they have the ability to do three stacks. In their best match, they did stacks of 5, 6, 6 - all with bins, but no noodles. They scored a total of ZERO autonomous points in Australia. Instead, they attempt to pick up all three recycling containers and start stacking. I have not watched all their video- just a few matches at this point. The reason I missed them initially is simple: Their alliance scores are underwhelming. Watching the video shows that, most of the time, they were almost the only ones scoring on their alliance. Here are their alliance scores through Australia: Qualifications: 50, 66, 126, 28, 75, 46, 92, 100, 29, 69, 145, 14 Average = 70 Clearly they didn't frequently put up three 6-sacks (118 w/o noodles), even if their alliance partners scored zero points. Quarters: 121, 114 Semis: 107, 169, 144 Finals: 114, 134, 104 Average = 125.9 Now, they've only played in the one event and show the potential to be a very strong feeder station bot. However, they have also shown the potential to completely tank matches. The question I would have about them: What have they done to improve themselves since March 14? Yes, I put them on the "robots to watch" list. I don't, however, see them as a favorite in Curie until they show that they can replicate their efforts. An area they could struggle: Pairings. Their autonomous routine seems necessary for their stacking game. Thus, they eliminate the ability for other robots to score their auto-stacks at the same time. Also, if they pick up all three bins, but have an "off" match, they not only fail to score themselves, but prevent alliance partners who like those recycling bins from scoring as well. |
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
They have played in one competition and scored a total of zero autonomous points. |
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
4613 is very impressive and I'd expect them to be an alliance captain or high pick. |
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
I do question the rope that pulls the last yellow tote in... In the second run through, it very much looks like it starts on top of (i.e. supported by) the tote- which would be a G7 violation... However, the dialogue about it states that it is free standing, which would be fine. Yes, definitely a team to watch. I still don't rank them with 1114 or 148 (or even 3309) until they do it in competition. If they do what they claim, they will, in all likelihood, rank very high. |
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
So very excited to be back in Curie! Now that we've broken the curse, anything is possible. Although, I kinda want Tesla to become a powerhouse, because Tesla.
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
Edit: people kinda beat me to this, but gonna leave it up anyways |
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
|
Re: 2015 Curie Divison
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:57. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi