![]() |
Re: Robots vs. Humans
Quote:
|
Re: Robots vs. Humans
This would a fantastic match to see at various off-season events. Just remember your safety glasses. One question though, would humans be allowed to catch thrown litter and throw it back?
Either way, I feel that humans would win due to speed. 3 humans could work together to make a capped 6 stack at a time in under 10 seconds. That's 13 stacks. Off topic: From my experience to add to The President of the Universe's post 2005: Robots win. Humans would have trouble capping large stacks, especially the center goal 2004: Humans win. Hanging would be a problem for humans, unless you got some tall people. Capping would be simple for a human to do but herding would be more difficult. Since humans players were the primary scorers any way, humans have the advantage. 2003: Humans would win, because they could make a stack and protect it fairly easily. The king-of-the-hill though, I want to say humans but there were some powerful robots with low CoGs in that game. 2002: Humans by far...unless they're up against 71, then the Beast would take it. |
Re: Robots vs. Humans
2015 would actually be pretty close. It shouldn't be that difficult for humans to score every tote on the field during the match so they would still be able to put up massive scores even if robots got all 4 cans every match.
20 + 8 + 4 = 32 auto points should be really easy to do for humans 3 cans + 18 totes +3 noodles = 3 x 42 = 126 points also relatively easy to do for humans 52 remaining totes = 104 points humans should be able to consistently get all the totes on the field scored including upside down and totes on the step a good noodle thrower should be able to score 5 of the seven remaining noodles = 20 points Total = 282 points scored by humans consistently which so far would beat most robot alliances if multiple matches where played If someone is willing to sacrifice their body and is insanely quick a person may be able to win a can which would then pretty much guarantee victory for humans. |
Re: Robots vs. Humans
Quote:
|
Re: Robots vs. Humans
Quote:
|
Re: Robots vs. Humans
Quote:
2015: Humans would likely build stacks, then cap them unlike most teams in 2015 who build a stack underneath a container. 2014: Humans would often opt for truss/catch maneuvers instead of trussing to HP, and they would finish from up close unlike many other robots. 2013: Humans would be able to basically dunk 4 discs into the 2-pt goal easily, and some would be able to do the same for the 3-pt goal. Humans could easily climb the pyramid and dump colored discs, as well as block the robot's full-court shooters with ease. 2012: Humans would dunk, but balancing might be hard for three humans, as all three would be constantly moving their body weight around. 2011: Humans don't have minibots, but could otherwise easily fill up all scoring slots 2010: Humans would crush at this game, and could hang from or climb onto the tunnels with ease. 2009: I don't even wanna think about this one. 2008: Humans could hurdle the ball and catch it with ease and do far more laps than most robots. |
Re: Robots vs. Humans
Either way, I think it would be hilarious to watch a "match" played by humans this year.
|
Re: Robots vs. Humans
I wish they had thought of doing this as an exhibition match during a break sometime during champs.
Too bad our team practice field has to be dismantled soon. This would have been fun to try. |
Re: Robots vs. Humans
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Robots vs. Humans
Quote:
|
Re: Robots vs. Humans
This has made me remember how much I want an off-season competition where people bring humans to play the game instead of robots.
|
Re: Robots vs. Humans
Quote:
|
Re: Robots vs. Humans
I think in general the top teams do consistently better than humans at any game. 2014 would probably be the exception. 2013, no way- few humans can throw it into the slot as consistently and accuratly as a robot IMO, although the 30 point climb could offset it.
2008 could be tricky for humans due to the sheer size of the ball. Recycle Rush is the perfect time for humans to play against robots (minus can grabbers). A game with no defense to test their stacking prowess without risk of injury. |
Re: Robots vs. Humans
Quote:
Challenge: Humans vs Robots. 3 robots vs 3 humans. Standard human player setup behind the wall for both sides. No returning noodles, each alliance is assigned 2 cans from the step. I'm willing to bet that the humans would give the robots a run for their money--the humans could "airmail" totes to each other. |
Re: Robots vs. Humans
Quote:
Quote:
Back to the original topic, one of my questions for a version with this game: Can people have (unpowered) ramps? Because some people felt it was a bit cheap to use a ramp tethered to a robot to help them score, would humans have the same freedom? And could humans join #teamtether? :D |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:10. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi