![]() |
Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
I have seen both used before, I just want to know if one is in any way better than the other. Or just the benefits of using one over the other.
|
Re: Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
We've used sheet metal for a couple small parts.
It lets you cheesehole like crazy to get rid of material that doesn't really help strength anyway if a sponsor does it. Channel is faster to source though. |
Re: Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
It really is dependent on many factors: resources, time, designing capabilities, experience, etc. WildStang has recently worked with two sheet metal manufactures to make parts for our robots. This year, our bot was almost entirely sheet metal, apart from most parts on our lift. Channel is useful for many things, you just need to use it right. I'm not going to get into much detail about this, or start a war. You may want to look at older threads that explain pros and cons of both.
|
Re: Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
The best way is using the resources at your disposal. Both require different design methodology, but both will get the job done.
|
Re: Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
For the last 6 years our drive train was c-channel. We have done one and two level chassises for complex designs.
The channel is quick to put together snap together, easy to mount to(just need to make spacers for the inside so it clod rant get pinched), and not all to heavy.(can always still wide holes to take out weight) We may switch to sheet metal or tube design chassis next year if we can get access to the cnc machine. |
Re: Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
The biggest difference is that most teams using C-channel or other extrusions are typically doing most of the individual part fabrication inhouse, where most teams that do primarily sheet metal construction have their parts produced in partnership with an external sponsor. This is a very different approach to fabrication, and it works very well with certain resource sets (and not well at all with others). I wrote at length about the process, and why our team uses it, here.
|
Re: Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
Quote:
|
Re: Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
Quote:
|
Do you do large scale 3-D printing? Or just small stuff? I know of a team that 3-D printed a whole chassis with carbon fiber and fiberglass infused filament on an 8 foot by 8 foot printer platform.
|
Re: Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
Quote:
|
Re: Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
Quote:
|
Re: Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
Sheet metal frames allow you have a much lighter but equally strong chassy/robot compared to slotted tube, however sheet metal is harder to fabricate (bending it correctly) and can be dented easer, though i would definitely use sheet metal if i ever get the chance.
also note that by making the base out of sheet metal you have also move the robot/s center of mass much higher, thus making it more flip prone. |
Re: Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
Quote:
|
Re: Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
Quote:
it's due to that fact that your weight lemit is 120 so by reduce your chassie weight by 20 pound and now you added it to the top of the robot, you will be more likely to have more mass at the top of the robot and is more likely to tip/flip if this needs further explanation I'll reply when it's not 2:14 AM lol :) |
Re: Sheet Metal Fabrication vs. Using Channel
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi