Chief Delphi - Best Sensor for Unlimited Rotation Swerve

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)

- Technical Discussion (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=22)

- - Best Sensor for Unlimited Rotation Swerve (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=137230)

Best Sensor for Unlimited Rotation Swerve

Sidebar:

Quote:

Before I get started, I initially titled this post "Best Sensor for Unicorn Swerve" because I THOUGHT that the term "Unicorn Swerve" was a reference to what I thought of as the "unicorn horn" i.e. shaft that drives the wheels (via a bevel gear), that is typically used on Unlimited Rotation Swerve Modules. But a little googling made me think that folks are using "unicorn swerve" to refer to 4 wheel swerve with 4 wheel independent steering (perhaps a reference to the rarity of such a beast when the term was coined?).

I like my interpretation better but since the purpose of language is communication, I suppose I had better defer to the views of others on this subject.

Preamble:

Quote:

I know it will come as a shock to folks but I have fallen in love with Swerve all over again. I first used Swerve in 1998 (Ladder Logic) and I loved it then but after a number of years using it, I came to the conclusion that it was SUCH A RESOURCE HOG (no matter how you measured it: space, current, motors, weight, engineering effort, programming effort, karma,...), that I couldn't justify it any more. BUT... ...last year's experience using Wild Swerves from Team221.com together with the navX from Kauai Labs has me rethinking this. Our Coding Team really outdid themselves; Scorpion was one of the best behaved and easiest to drive robots I've been associated with. I am not sure I'm ever going back to non-swerve drives.

BUT... ...of course there are improvements. We want it to take up less space, weigh less, be more robust, use less power, easier to maintain, shoot freakin' lasers out its axles, ;-)

We've decided to look into using a swerve with a bevel gear drive system so that we can remote the drive motors (and perhaps add a shifter or multiple motors per wheel if the spirit moves us) and also because we think that in a game with Defense (a.k.a. the 2016 FRC game -- bet on it) we will certainly want to allow the steering axis to have unlimited rotation angle.

Which finally lets me get to my actual message.

In an unlimited rotation angle world, the natural thing to do is to put a quadrature encoder (like a US Robotics or a Grayhill or some such) in the swerve drive system somewhere and pretty much call it good.

But... ...I hate that idea. The main reason is that then you have to zero the count when the robot wakes up (or goes brain dead*). Yes, you can get around this with training and check lists and such but it is a long season, this decision is going to bite you in the tukhus before its over.

Here is what I would like.

Something that can deal with unlimited rotation (obviously)
Something that is 1:1 with the actual steering angle and does not require the controller to be zeroed (other than a constant programmed into the robot once and only changed if there is work on the robot -- if ever).
Something that has a resolution of under 1 degree -- preferably 1/10th a degree or better.
Something with as little noise as possible (To get reasonable responses, we use a lot of D Gain in our PID Loop. Noise is really tough for Deriviative Feedback loops to deal with.)
Something with at Digital Output if possible -- for two reasons. First, we had a heck of a time with noise on the 5V supply and on the GND from the RoboRIO, so it was hard to get a noise free signal out of a lot of our sensors (like pots for example). Second we ran out of analog inputs on the RoboRIO and had to add a coprocessor just to manage the extra analog signals. Not ideal. If we can put the steering position I2C or SPI, that may make our lives better -- though perhaps not because we are thinking of using the Talon SRX to do our PID loop, I don't think the Talon SRX likes getting its sensor input via anything other than Quadrature or Analog. So, I don't really know what I want in this department.

Anyway, I would like learn from folk with unlimited rotation swerve experience. What sensor scheme did you use and what are the pros (and cons) of those choices?

Do tell.

Dr. Joe J.

*don't get me started about FIRST's decision to allow the NI folks to allow the RoboRIO loose its mind at just under 7V -- this is something close to criminal. Really... this was a really dumb design direction given the customer base and the intended use of the RoboRIO.