![]() |
Re: Brand Recognition
I guess I am a bit confused as to the message this thread conveys. If we are not on the list should we be rethinking, retooling our branding efforts? Are we missing outreach effectiveness? If we are 'underbranded' exactly what are the consequences? Do we need to change our image? Shall we have more than our driver adopt a mohawk? Should I color the little hair I have left?:) :)
|
Re: Brand Recognition
Quote:
I'm actually surprised our number of votes is anywhere near 4039. They've been competitive since their inception and go as far as building branded rainbow bumpers for practice day. The only thing we really do imagery wise is following a solid set of branding standards. |
Re: Brand Recognition
I know this thread isn't a competition. I am thinking there was a motive for starting this. Doesn't brand recognition have some relationship to competition though? It affects financial support for a team and resource availability. It impacts several awards too, right? My questions hope to elicit constructive suggestions that might help my team increase brand recognition ...which I assume was the same motive for the OP of this thread.
|
Re: Brand Recognition
While I think my team has a pretty decent brand, I am incredibly surprised that 1902 did not make this list. They are the FIRST team I think of when I think of branding.
Oink Oink... |
Re: Brand Recognition
Quote:
...sorry, reflex. What's going on now? |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi