![]() |
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
|
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
For Wisconsin my top five would be:
1) 2826 - Awesome autonomous, able to make 3 full stacks a match, two regional wins and Einstein finalist 2) 2062 - Consistently put up 2 full stacks a match, a simple robot, and also have two regional wins this year 3) 1732 - Solid stacker and were just short of being in the finals of the Wisconsin Regional 4) 3418 - Decent stacker, good at capping stacks, interesting canburglar, and finalist at the Wisconsin Regional. 5) 93 - Lake Superior Regional winner, just shy of the finals in Wisconsin, and in my opinion the best stack capper in the state Honorable mentions include: 2077, 5148, and 706 |
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
Quote:
Quote:
-219 -303 -316 -1403 -2590 |
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
My top 5 for Minnesota(I submitted my top teams in the survey but wanted to give some reasoning behind it),
1) 2512- With one of the best 3 tote auto's out there, they amazed everyone with their 3 tote auto at their week 1 regional which is impressive in my book. They improved in between competitions and were dominant at the MN state championship. They were capable of scoring 104 points a match at times(3 tote auto + 2 capped and noodled 6 stacks) at state. 2) 3130- Best MN landfill bot this year. These guys put up high scores at Northern Lights and North star this year. They were ranked 4th in newton and ended up as semi-finalists! I'm really happy for their double banner season! 3) 2502- Best HP loader bot from MN this year. These guys dominated at 10,000 lakes. They were even better at champs where they were picked 9th overall by the 8th seeded alliance! I'm glad we got to compete with 2502 twice and I was disappointed that they didn't qualify for state. 3) 2883- FRED had an amazing ability to make stacks in chunks. They were extremely reliable and I was glad that we got to compete with them twice this year! Their tethered ramp addition was a smart idea before the state tournament which made them much quicker. 5) 2169- Another robot that didn't qualify for state which deserved to. They did very well at the Wisconsin regional and champs. 2nd best landfill bot in Minnesota and one of the best can burglar bots from MN at champs(Picked 8th overall in Hopper). I felt like they were really underrated this year and they were one of the best robots coming out of MN. Honorable mentions: 1816, 4778, 5172 |
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
This is really, really hard...I'm doing just northern CA because it's hard enough as it is:
1. 254 - they won CVR and SVR, and seeded first on Carson with a robot capable of 4 full stacks and 200+ points on its own; that did landfill, HP, and coop; with a 20pt auto; and with a max OPR of 157. 2. 1678 - focusing on the center containers and stacks of 5 from the HP station, they finished a 5 banner season, winning CVR, Sac, SVR, Newton, and Einstein. 3. 971 - despite being eliminated in semis at Sac they made finals at SVR and were the first seed on Carver, grabbing two containers in auto and doing cycles of 6 from the HP station. 4. 1671 - made semis at CVR and Sac as captain of the 4th and 2nd alliances, they somehow made it to 2nd pick of 118/1678 on Newton, where they did 6 stack cycles from the HP. 5. 701 - capping their HP stacks with center containers picked off in teleop, they were finalists at CVR, Sac, and Lone Star. Other teams: 2085, finalists at Sac and SVR with another HP stacker, and 846, who made semis at SVR and is one the best teams from northern CA to not make it to champs. I'm not entirely sure if 973 is considered northern or southern CA, since they're basically halfway between San Jose and LA, so I didn't include them (the list was also hard enough as it is...) I just realized that out of these 7 teams, 6 stacked only from the HP station as far as I know. |
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
Texas
1. 118 - World Champs, 5 Banners, fast can grab, clears the landfill, reliable auto stack 2. 148 - The best of Team Tether, reliable auto, 3+ stacks a match, consistent 3. 624 - Texas' best robot at the chute door that didn't use a tether. Had an awesome season and should do very well at a number of their off-season events including IRI. 4/5. 4587/1296 - Consistency issues plagued both these robots at championships but when they are on it's hard to beat their stack output. Not getting consistent tote stacks in auto and the inability of tether bots to grab cans moves them down the list. 2468, 3310, 1817, and many others had great robots this year as well. |
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
let me take a stab at Georgia.
1. 2974. Very simple robot that could do 2 fully capped stacks of 5 from the HP. Won Orlando 2. 4188. Reliable 5 stacks fully capped from the feeder station, but sometimes were only able to do 1. Won Peachtree. 3. 1746. Did 2 reliable 5 stacks with cans from the HP station, but not as versatile as 4188 or 2974. Semifinalists at both regional competitions they attended 4. 4468. Decent landfill machine that specialized in landfill stacking. They could only stack totes, but paired with a good capping robot, their strategies were deadly. Finalists at peachtree 5.1648. Similar robot to 4468, made mad stacks out of the landfill and could clear it of totes. Didn't add RC abilities until it was too late, and they couldn't refine their can stacking. Their tote stacking was unparalleled though. |
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
From Missouri, based on State Championship Results:
1: 1730: 3 capped 6 stacks from HP, auto stack 2: 1986: Stacks of 3 from landfill, then 3 more totes and RC, caps with this stack for 6. 3: 4522: Stacks of 5 with RC from HP, Unique belt clamp mechanism to hold stacks 4: 1806: Stacks of 6 with RC from HP, auto stack, competitive with 1730 5: 1987: Conveyor system, ~ 5 stacks of 3-6 without RC. Works best with a partner who can cap stacks. |
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
Since "best" is a fairly subjective term, Imma go ahead and present my results for Michigan using a few different sets of criteria.
Commence the research! ::rtm:: First, here's the rankings based on FIRST in Michigan's own proprietary system:
...or don't. Whatever. |
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
Quote:
Interestingly, the only Southern California team that I would slot into this group is 330 as they made Einstein. 973 looked to be just below this group this year. This seemed to be a down year for Southern California, especially compared to the standout year they had in 2014. |
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
Definitely 955 should be in the top 5 in Oregon. Amazingly compact, well built, and a PNW district champs winner.
|
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
Quote:
|
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
Quote:
|
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
Quote:
Joking aside I would agree with most of the rankings I have seen in here so far, recognize many many numbers from this year. |
Re: Top 5 robots in each state
IMO these are the best from SC.
1. 283, the Generals: after being dormant for many years they came out strong this year and deserved to go to St. Louis but unfortunately did not. 2. 4451, Robotz Garage: one of the fastest week one hp stackers 3. 343, Metal in Motion: one of the few SE week one 3 tote autos and by peachtree it was a decent hp stacker 4. 1319, Flash: a slight adjustment of weight distribution would have made this a fantastic robot 5.This last one is hard, not that there are not other good teams, but no other standouts for me. (I am a part of 343 so some bias there and to the upstate, all these teams are upstate teams) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:15. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi