Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   State Power Alliances 2015 (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=137412)

bam-bam 04-06-2015 19:16

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carpedav000 (Post 1485820)
Can you explain why they should be in the landfill group (besides the fact that they are a landfill bot)

They are deceptively a smart team. There's a reason why they had led the number 8 alliance at Purdue to the finals and the number 5 alliance at Indianapolis to a win. 447 would have gotten our number 8 alliance into semi-finals at INDCP if we weren't disabled at the station with one more stack to go (and 234-1024-292 knocked more stacks down).

They basically mine the landfill, steal one of the bins, and build their stack. It's not much, but you have 1720 doing the same thing (albeit in a cleaner manner). At this point late in the season with the can stealers, they are somewhat rendered unable to build a stack, but so is 1720 if they can't speed up there can stealer.

logank013 04-06-2015 19:17

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
447 was a good landfill bot but they didn't show to be nearly as good as 1741, 1720, or 71. They were more of a good week 1 robot. They just didnt improve as much as the other bots did.

logank013 04-06-2015 19:20

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bam-bam (Post 1485822)
They are deceptively a smart team. There's a reason why they had led the number 8 alliance at Purdue to the finals and the number 5 alliance at Indianapolis to a win. 447 would have gotten our number 8 alliance into semi-finals at INDCP if we weren't disabled at the station with one more stack to go (and 234-1024-292 knocked more stacks down).

They basically mine the landfill, steal one of the bins, and build their stack. It's not much, but you have 1720 doing the same thing (albeit in a cleaner manner). At this point late in the season with the can stealers, they are somewhat rendered unable to build a stack, but so is 1720 if they can't speed up there can stealer.

If I remember right, 1501 was the leader of those alliances at those events. Don't get me wrong, 447 was a good robot. They complimented 1501 very well but I don't think they were the leader as far as the bot capabilities went.

DWCEagles228 10-06-2015 23:28

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
In CT I think that there are a couple teams up that could work.
#1 2168, 2067, 228

2168 can steal cans from middle and make stakes from landfill or use there ramp and go from human, i have seen them make two perfect stakes from landfill consistently and when they use there ramp i think they could make three perfect stakes if nothing goes wrong.

2067 can steal can from middle, as well as play with other alliances minds in auto, they make stakes from landfill consistently and they have they best human player there is for throwing noodles

228 can not steal cans, but they can consistently make three perfect stakes from human player and get on naked stake done as well. They also are able to stake faster than 195


my other alliance would be
#2 195 2067 228

195 can steal from middle and make three perfect stakes with 20 seconds to spare, they can right the cans with there ramp,

2067 can steal can from middle, as well as play with other alliances minds in auto, they make stakes from landfill consistently and they have they best human player there is for throwing noodles

228 can not steal cans, but they can consistently make three perfect stakes from human player and get on naked stake done as well. They also are able to stake faster than 195

bkahl 10-06-2015 23:31

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DWCEagles228 (Post 1486440)
They also are able to stake faster than 195

Is there proof of this somewhere?

DWCEagles228 10-06-2015 23:42

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bkahl (Post 1486441)
Is there proof of this somewhere?

At BattleCry i had three people time 228 and 195 and 228 was faster by 2 to 3 seconds.

bkahl 10-06-2015 23:44

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DWCEagles228 (Post 1486442)
At BattleCry i had three people time 228 and 195 and 228 was faster by 2 to 3 seconds.

At Battlecry, IIRC, 228 only placed 3 capped 6 stacks 2 times.

195 Has been consistently been placing 3 6 stacks since week 5.

EDIT:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FN9DhyR3aFc

228: First tote fed: 130s Stack Placed:88s Stack Time: 42s

195: First tote fed: 112s Stack Placed: 86s Stack Time: 26s

Brandon Holley 11-06-2015 10:42

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bkahl (Post 1486443)
At Battlecry, IIRC, 228 only placed 3 capped 6 stacks 2 times.

195 Has been consistently been placing 3 6 stacks since week 5.

EDIT:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FN9DhyR3aFc

228: First tote fed: 130s Stack Placed:88s Stack Time: 42s

195: First tote fed: 112s Stack Placed: 86s Stack Time: 26s

Seems like 195 is the faster staker.

DWCEagles228 12-06-2015 02:10

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brandon Holley (Post 1486459)
Seems like 195 is the faster staker.

Yes they may be the faster staker once they start to stake, but 228 can stake faster from once they get the can inside to when they place the stake down

Kevin Leonard 12-06-2015 07:54

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DWCEagles228 (Post 1486517)
Yes they may be the faster staker once they start to stake, but 228 can stake faster from once they get the can inside to when they place the stake down

From what I'm understanding of this conversation, when the vampires attack, I need to go to Connecticut.
Got it. :rolleyes:

Andrew Schreiber 12-06-2015 08:14

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard (Post 1486521)
From what I'm understanding of this conversation, when the vampires attack, I need to go to Connecticut.
Got it. :rolleyes:

Yes, but not if you need something spelled correctly... Or, apparently, to determine which of something is faster. They seem to have a funky definition there which doesn't take reality into account.

cjl2625 12-06-2015 08:36

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DWCEagles228 (Post 1486517)
Yes they may be the faster staker once they start to stake, but 228 can stake faster from once they get the can inside to when they place the stake down

Even if you feel that 228 could complete a stack faster than 195 under perfect conditions, you need to look at the facts.
195 consistently makes 3 six stacks in a typical match, capped and noodled.
228 does not. Your claim of 3 capped stacks + 1 uncapped just isn't true (if I understand your English correctly).

228 is a very good team, and we enjoyed playing with you at CT champs. But you can't really deny the reality here.

electroken 12-06-2015 08:51

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber (Post 1486522)
Yes, but not if you need something spelled correctly... Or, apparently, to determine which of something is faster. They seem to have a funky definition there which doesn't take reality into account.

Yo mama.

An mi speling is fyn. ;)

And we can skip the trash talk. 195 and 228 have an opportunity to slug it out in Wolcott tomorrow, while the TorMentors knock all their stacks over.

bkahl 12-06-2015 09:39

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by electroken (Post 1486526)
while the TorMentors knock all their stacks over.

With 195's practice robot!

electroken 12-06-2015 09:55

Re: State Power Alliances 2015
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bkahl (Post 1486530)
With 195's practice robot!

Nope. It's Talon XVI's evil twin. It's already in Wolcott.

Waiting.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:26.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi