![]() |
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
A) This feels a bit like it's a "pushing on a rope" topic.
B) Don't train people to become FIRST coaches. Train them to become STEM coaches. Those two aren't close to being the same thing. FIRST is good, but FIRST is neither everything STEM, nor proven to be best STEM. C) When I am able to semi-retire; I look forward to doing more informal or formal teaching. An opportunity to get some high-quality training would be very welcome. Blake |
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
Just to get the semantics correct, in general,
...Universities contain Colleges ......Colleges contain Schools .........Schools contain Departments ............Departments contain the chair and faculty There are two common models of creating science teachers model 1) the College of Education teaches the science education courses to the students model 2) the College of Education teachers educational pedagogy, and the College of Science teaches the teachers the science education courses We use the 2nd model. What if an engineering educator degree was created using the College of Education for pedagogy, and the College of Engineering for the engineering and technology courses ? What if this degree had an intensive product development course, similiar to http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mechanica...i-spring-2009/ This course gave birth to FIRST, and can be used to train a teacher in the fundamentals of what it take to design, build, and deliver a product in a hurry. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
BS Degree, MS Degree, and certificate. The thinking for the BS is that much of the upper division courses of an engineering degree isn't necessary for K-12 teaching, and many people that might want to participate in engineering type activities do not want to complete a full engineering degree. They would be better off focusing on principle of engineering and mastering the educational pedagogy, the how to teach it and how students learn. The BS route would best be for a high school student starting as a freshman, or a transfer student in from a 2 year community technical college. It's a free country. If a candidate wants to get the full engineering degree, then extended training to become a teacher, by all means help yourself. Requiring teachers to have a full engineering degree where they might have taken courses in stochastic theory, or deform-able bodies, or modulation theory, only slows down and reduces the supply of teachers. You reach a point of diminishing returns. Still mapping out what MS, Phd and certificate should look like. There are a lot of ways to recruit candidates. It is my opinion that the vast number of K-12 engineering and technology teachers will not come from engineering schools as pure engineers nor from educator schools as pure educators. I believe there are a LOT of people that like technology and would be glad to teach pre-engineering and principle of engineer, and technology. As earlier posters have stated, there isn't a lot of options for a high school graduates that want to go into middle/high school engineering education. |
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
Quote:
Here's a short list from the national organization... http://www.iteea.org/Resources/institutionalmembers.htm Programs just like this already exist. I graduated with a BS in Technology/Engineering Education. Obviously each state is slightly different, and might have different names for the certificate, but the framework is already there. Most of the schools listed also have Master's degree programs (MEd) that culminate in a teaching certificate. It looks like University of Georgia already offers this program, are you working with a different institution? Looks like Savannah State University also offers an undergrad degree. http://teched.uga.edu/ Googling for your state's specifics would be a good place to start for all the aspiring teachers in this thread. |
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
Quote:
As to the already existent ability to add teacher education on top of an engineering BS, yes, of course we can. (It's a free country, and I'm seriously examining it.) But considering the point of this is to up the number of engineering teachers, I'd think the push would be less about what's possible and more about what's actively advertised as a potential audience/degree option. |
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
This does sound very interesting. It would be cool to get paid to do what I love to do anyways. Make them evening classes and I'd probably sign up.
|
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
Quote:
|
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
Quote:
I need to dig up old pictures. For awhile, we did both programs and decided to end our EV program once we got into VEX Robotics. Glenn |
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
Now that summer is over and school is back in session, I'm going to bump this thread.
Please comment if you or someone you know might be interested in becoming an educator for engineering and technology education, with an emphasis on product development. The fundamental question to FIRST students is "after graduating high school, would you be interested in going to a university and earning a four year STEM educator degree with a focus on Engineering Education" ???? |
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
Personally, I'd be more interested in an after-hours/online certificate program.
|
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
Quote:
I working to justify creating a BS degree program. It closes a gap, by allowing STEM oriented high school students to take a direct engineering / education route to a BS and the classroom. It falls well short of an ABET accredited engineering degree. See the chart here |
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
Um... actually, I do that for a living.
Teach teachers to teach technology education, that is. After 13 years of teaching high school 'shop' I'm teaching in the same program I graduated from 20 years ago... and we've been doing it in BC for the past fifty years. To be fair, the program isn't specifically "engineering". We cover Auto Mechanics, Woodwork, Metalwork, Drafting, Electronics, and Material Science. Students spend about 30 hours each week for four semesters learning "hands on" in a shop environment. (Okay, some of my lectures aren't always as 'hands on' as I'd like.) Students are responsible for getting their "first year" university credits before enrolling in the program, spend two years with us at BCIT in the shops, and then spend 12 months at UBC to complete their B.Ed degree. It is a five year B.Ed degree that qualifies them to teach in BC, and by extension most other provinces in Canada (and likely states in the USA, although I haven't followed that through in detail as we don't currently graduate enough students to meet domestic demand, let alone worrying about work permits and the like) I do know, however, that some of our grads have had a good time finding work in Australia.... We have a great group of students with backgrounds in the trades, technologies, and even the occasional engineer entering the program. It is kind of a unique program, but our graduates make up 100% of the current and past FRC team lead mentors from BC (albeit a small sample set) and about 80% of VEX teachers in BC. Not bad for only taking 22 students a year! So glad to hear that other people are looking at the same thing! Jason |
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
Quote:
I think someone said, if there was enough demand there would be a MAT path for this certification. That would lead me to ask why isn't there one already? It is possible the demand just isn't there? I think you are driving this from the wrong end of the pipe. Increase demand, then work of supply. |
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
Yes I am having to create an economic ROI analysis or something to that effect.
There is a large demand. People have not been able to articulate what it should look like until recently. The degree isn't shop class, but an "integrative stem" teaching degree. Engineering is a highly stem integrated discipline. Front page article in this weeks NSTA journal was about this very topic. The problem schools are having is there are a lot of courses on the books that can't be taught, so they don't start the class, and in turn there is no teacher demand. Chicken & Egg. |
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
Quote:
But I agree there needs to be a better job of training folks to teach engineering type skills. I have seen some really bad engineering classes. |
Re: Engineering "Educator" Degree Programs
I pray that most FRC teams are gearing their teams for students interested in 'shop classes'.
The skills gap in the U.S. is getting out of hand. And for teams to be overlooking these students is a disservice to the respective teams and the students that they could reach. And as for 'Shop teacher' - there is a MASSIVE SHORTAGE! In Minnesota alone, we had 40 openings for Tech Ed/Engineering Ed in 2015 - and St. Cloud State University (the only school in MN offering this degree) graduated a total of two. For any student involved in FRC that wants to continue in this field and has a desire to inspire, this is a great career! |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:24. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi