Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Off-Season Events (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   IRI Predictions (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=137644)

carpedav000 04-07-2015 13:25

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by logank013 (Post 1488972)
He isn't on team due to a new child. he should be back in a year or 2. Chris is the one on the planning committee. I can ask him Monday but, I just wanted to find out before then ;)

Haha I understsand. He was our FLL coach when Abraham was born, he also took a break then. He is a VERY good coach/mentor.

mipo0707 04-07-2015 14:10

Re: IRI Predictions
 
9 matches with 68 teams last year
this year should have 9-10 matches

BrennanB 06-07-2015 22:01

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mipo0707 (Post 1488975)
9 matches with 68 teams last year
this year should have 9-10 matches

Setup/reset time is longer this year. May alter how many matches they can get through.

FIMAlumni 07-07-2015 19:34

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Bold Predictions:

The alliance with the highest score at IRI will not win the event.

Five alliances will have either the captain or first pick be a landfill specialist.

One in every five qualification matches will leave at least one can on the step after autonomous.

Two alliances will leave the quarterfinals due to a can being dropped from a full stack.

If a team misses one auto (totes or cans) they will not be trusted in half of their remaining matches.

One semifinalist will need to use their backup robot due to mechanical failures.

One alliance will lose because none of the three teams on the field can reliably upright cans.

Top robots will make a capped 6 stack in autonomous from the landfill.

Every alliance will be capable of making 7 tall stacks, but it will only happen in 50% of qualifications and 80% of eliminations.

To advance from quarterfinals: Average of 250
To advance from semifinals: Average of 270

The other Gabe 07-07-2015 19:43

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by FIMAlumni (Post 1489265)
Bold Predictions:

The alliance with the highest score at IRI will not win the event.

Five alliances will have either the captain or first pick be a landfill specialist.

One in every five qualification matches will leave at least one can on the step after autonomous.

Two alliances will leave the quarterfinals due to a can being dropped from a full stack.

If a team misses one auto (totes or cans) they will not be trusted in half of their remaining matches.

One semifinalist will need to use their backup robot due to mechanical failures.

One alliance will lose because none of the three teams on the field can reliably upright cans.

Top robots will make a capped 6 stack in autonomous from the landfill.

Every alliance will be capable of making 7 tall stacks, but it will only happen in 50% of qualifications and 80% of eliminations.

To advance from quarterfinals: Average of 250
To advance from semifinals: Average of 270

you still can't make a 7 stack?

Abhishek R 07-07-2015 20:21

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The other Gabe (Post 1489266)
you still can't make a 7 stack?

I think he means 7 distinct stacks of 6 totes high.

FIMAlumni 07-07-2015 20:53

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Abhishek R (Post 1489269)
I think he means 7 distinct stacks of 6 totes high.

Correct, 7 tall stacks= 7 stacks of 5 or 6.

Pouncing Zebra 08-07-2015 14:38

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BL0X3R (Post 1488878)
Challenge Accepted. (obviously not at IRI, but I think we can programmatically shave at least another 2 seconds off our match-long routine by whatever off-season we do attend)

To keep the thread on topic, I'll post my prediction...
(Purposefully leaving out 3rd picks - there's no way I will be able to guess those)

Seeding:
1) 2826
2) 1023
3) 118
4) 1114
5) 2056
6) 624
7) 1730
8) 1325

Alliances and Results:
1) 2826-118-234 (F)
2) 1023-1114-330 (W)
3) 2056-1325-4039
4) 624-33-2468 (SF)
5) 1730-16-67(SF)
6) 1310-2338-316
7) 195-503-233
8) 548-469-1640

Your predictions are my favorite so far (you could make them better by changing the "W" and the "F")

evanperryg 08-07-2015 15:13

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Abhishek R (Post 1488680)
Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

seven.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard (Post 1488755)
2338 reunites with their championship alliance partners, 1023, as well as 1806. The consistency of all three robots is top-notch, with 2338 in the landfill, and 1023 and 1806 making feeder stacks with their respective ramps.

tell that to the magical looking forward guy... Besides the whole 2826 declining thing, sounds alright to me :D

Top seeds:
1 2826
2 118
3 624
4 1114
5 1023
6 2056
7 1730
8 1756
9 2122
10 67
11 2468

Results:
1 2826 118 1619 (W)
2 624 1114 195 (SF)
3 1023 2056 548 (F)
4 1730 2338 1218 (SF)
5 1756 3130 1640
6 2122 16 330
7 67 1310 233
8 2468 107 1625

2826 gets top seed with their auto and consistent teleop. Picks 118 for their strong landfill abilities and consistent step auto. 1619 stacks a lot. Highest-scoring auto period and highest-scoring teleop period of any alliance.

624 gets second with consistent strong teleop performances and a consistent auto. 1114 has put on their regional pullers and landfills for this alliance. 195 stacks a lot. 1114 goes too ham in semis, putting this high-scoring alliance just behind the third seed.

1023 is ridiculously consistent in everything they do, hitting their 20pt auto every match of the event. 2056 landfills extremely well and runs their step auto. 548 now makes 6-stacks and will perform well with their improvement. The consistency of this alliance will get them to finals, but 2826's auto and 118's greater landfill potential will not allow the 1023 alliance to keep up.

1730 makes 3 6-stacks from feeder with a strong 20pt auto. 2338 runs step auto, uses ramp tethered to 1730 (thanks weight limit) to stack from HP. 1218 landfills. Consistency gets this alliance into semis, but lower scoring potential does not allow them to advance.

1756 returns to their long ramp, running their strong 20pt auto and doing 3 6-stacks out of the feeder. 3130 makes their pullers work for IRI rules, landfilling 2 full stacks consistently. 1640 stacks a lot.

2122 and 16 both have strong can pullers and 20pt autos, but I think 2122 will opt to pull cans while 16 runs their auto. 330 stacks a lot.

67 uses their step auto, with a stronger teleop than they showed at champs. 1310 runs their auto and manages the landfill. 233 stacks a lot.

2468 struggles to form a competitive alliance, as the only captain without either can pullers or a stack auto. 107 resolves their 20pt auto problem with consistency in auto, and stacks out of the feeder. They get lucky, pulling 1625 off the back of the draft, giving them both a landfiller and a strong step auto.

The other Gabe 08-07-2015 15:24

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by FIMAlumni (Post 1489272)
Correct, 7 tall stacks= 7 stacks of 5 or 6.

directions were not clear :P

mwmac 08-07-2015 15:35

Re: IRI Predictions
 
"2122 and 16 both have strong can pullers and 20pt autos, but I think 2122 will opt to pull cans while 16 runs their auto. 330 stacks a lot."

Going to have to check with programming team to see when they created our 20 pt auto routine:confused:

Kevin Leonard 08-07-2015 16:01

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mwmac (Post 1489341)
"2122 and 16 both have strong can pullers and 20pt autos, but I think 2122 will opt to pull cans while 16 runs their auto. 330 stacks a lot."

Going to have to check with programming team to see when they created our 20 pt auto routine:confused:

Additionally, 16's 20 point autonomous was not very consistent in Carson. But I could easily see them showing up with a workiing routine. They are the Bomb Squad after all.

mwmac 08-07-2015 16:41

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard (Post 1489344)
Additionally, 16's 20 point autonomous was not very consistent in Carson. But I could easily see them showing up with a workiing routine. They are the Bomb Squad after all.

Agreed, given the depth of the field at IRI, I expect to see many teams with post CMP improvements to their robot's performance. I also expect to see at least one match with 8 6-high stacks...with five of them capped and noodled.

logank013 08-07-2015 16:45

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mwmac (Post 1489349)
Agreed, given the depth of the field at IRI, I expect to see a many teams with post CMP improvements to their robot's performance. I also expect to see at least one match with 8 6-high stacks...with five of them capped and noodled.

I think that it's possible to have 7 capped since each alliance is guaranteed 7 cans if at least 1 team has 2 can burglars.

carpedav000 08-07-2015 16:56

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by logank013 (Post 1489350)
I think that it's possible to have 7 capped since each alliance is guaranteed 7 cans if at least 1 team has 2 can burglars.

Or 1 claw that can be used twice ;)

logank013 08-07-2015 16:59

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carpedav000 (Post 1489352)
Or 1 claw that can be used twice ;)

Will 1741 be able to do that at IRI. That would be great to see.

mwmac 08-07-2015 17:13

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by logank013 (Post 1489350)
I think that it's possible to have 7 capped since each alliance is guaranteed 7 cans if at least 1 team has 2 can burglars.

7 capped should be a fairly frequent occurrence. The distinguishing feature will be how many are noodled given the likely congestion near the hp stations and the presence of ramps.

kyle_hamblett 08-07-2015 17:13

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thatprogrammer (Post 1488913)
I will just predict these alliances.

1. 1114, 2826, 179
4. 195, 2338, 1657

Let's see how wrong my predictions are :D

Seeing that 1114 and 179 are landfill bots, it would be interesting to see what would happen in that situation. 2826 would just do their own thing off in the corner.

carpedav000 08-07-2015 17:21

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by logank013 (Post 1489353)
Will 1741 be able to do that at IRI. That would be great to see.

We did that at Newton in almost every match.

thatprogrammer 08-07-2015 17:38

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kyle_hamblett (Post 1489358)
Seeing that 1114 and 179 are landfill bots, it would be interesting to see what would happen in that situation. 2826 would just do their own thing off in the corner.

179 is no longer a landfill robot. They made around 2 six stacks from the feeder at bayou. :)

FRCmediaMan 08-07-2015 17:55

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thatprogrammer (Post 1489367)
179 is no longer a landfill robot. They made around 2 six stacks from the feeder at bayou. :)

Who said our bot is the same as it was at Bayou? :D

Darkseer54 08-07-2015 17:58

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by evanperryg (Post 1489338)
1619 stacks a lot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanperryg (Post 1489338)
195 stacks a lot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanperryg (Post 1489338)
1640 stacks a lot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanperryg (Post 1489338)
330 stacks a lot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanperryg (Post 1489338)
233 stacks a lot.

TIL Teams at IRI stack a lot. :P

thatprogrammer 08-07-2015 18:14

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by FRCmediaMan (Post 1489371)
Who said our bot is the same as it was at Bayou? :D

It didn't seem that different at fpl :o.

Dylan179 08-07-2015 19:33

Re: IRI Predictions
 
https://www.facebook.com/10000561169...7/?pnref=story

Abhishek R 08-07-2015 19:47

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylan179 (Post 1489391)

Might just be me, but I can't get to the link.

llamadon 08-07-2015 19:50

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Abhishek R (Post 1489392)
Might just be me, but I can't get to the link.

Not just you. Got excited to see upgrades to the swampthing. Instead a broken link :(

John Retkowski 08-07-2015 21:30

Re: IRI Predictions
 
It must be a secret.:D I'm terrified for what they have in store.

Max Boord 08-07-2015 21:34

Re: IRI Predictions
 
This link should work.

FRCmediaMan 09-07-2015 00:33

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Video for the modifications is in the plans. If it dosnt get made before IRI we will post a working facebook link with the video before the event.

Dylan179 09-07-2015 10:54

Re: IRI Predictions
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqHaDXyFfVI

SoccerTaco 09-07-2015 12:10

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard (Post 1488634)
5) 118-624-3824-67

In finals match #1, ... despite 3824 getting a noodle caught in their elevator

In finals match #2, ... 3824 drops a stack due to well placed noodles

Kevin,

Grrrrr! We at 3824 never did like those silly noodles!! :cool:

I think we will see a lot less noodle throwing for a couple of reasons. The obvious reason is that we will be putting more of them in cans. 14 cans and 20 noodles - that is only 6 extra noodles. If cans split 7/7 and you are not noodling, you are in trouble. Also, with cans split 7/7 and every other point crucial, throwing a game object that the other team can use to get more points (by pushing them to the landfill) might be a questionable strategy.

Steve

mwmac 09-07-2015 12:15

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylan179 (Post 1489441)

Very nice....

Kevin Leonard 09-07-2015 12:57

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SoccerTaco (Post 1489445)
Kevin,

Grrrrr! We at 3824 never did like those silly noodles!! :cool:

I think we will see a lot less noodle throwing for a couple of reasons. The obvious reason is that we will be putting more of them in cans. 14 cans and 20 noodles - that is only 6 extra noodles. If cans split 7/7 and you are not noodling, you are in trouble. Also, with cans split 7/7 and every other point crucial, throwing a game object that the other team can use to get more points (by pushing them to the landfill) might be a questionable strategy.

Steve

Or, there might be more noodles because teams realize that as long as they land where they're supposed to, they're difficult to clear, get in their opponent's way (causing crazy things to happen sometimes), and are worth only two less points/noodle than if they were in cans. Plus, you still have three noodles to throw regardless that can be strategically placed with a good thrower.

If I'm up against an alliance I know I can't beat straight up in finals, and I need a miracle, I'm throwing all my noodles as close to my opponent's ramps and scoring platforms as possible and hoping they falter enough to give me the match.

That probably sounds terrible, and I hate noodles just as much as the next guy, but since they're a part of the game at IRI, I would use that however I can.

And no offense to 3824's robot- you guys have an incredible machine. Noodles screw up everybody.

evanperryg 09-07-2015 13:05

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mwmac (Post 1489341)
"2122 and 16 both have strong can pullers and 20pt autos, but I think 2122 will opt to pull cans while 16 runs their auto. 330 stacks a lot."

Going to have to check with programming team to see when they created our 20 pt auto routine:confused:

oh wow... I thought I saw you guys do that... and I forgot 33... just... oops...

Quote:

Originally Posted by mwmac (Post 1489349)
Agreed, given the depth of the field at IRI, I expect to see many teams with post CMP improvements to their robot's performance. I also expect to see at least one match with 8 6-high stacks...with five of them capped and noodled.

Their auto started pretty rough at Midwest, but they definitely made improvements, whether that be in code or in placement of the robot. I expect the scaling improvements to continue.

predictions version 2:

1 2826 118 1619
2 624 1114 195
3 1023 33 548
4 1730 2056 1640
5 1756 2338 1218
6 2122 3130 330
7 67 1310 233
8 2468 16 107

QF Seeding:
1 624 1114 195
2 2826 118 1619
3 1023 33 548
4 1730 2056 1640
5 1756 2338 1218
6 2468 16 107
7 2122 3130 330
8 67 1310 233

SF Seeding:
1 2826 118 1619
2 1023 33 548
3 624 1114 195
4 1730 2056 1640

Winner: 2826 118 1619

Kevin Leonard 09-07-2015 15:08

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Let's do some generic picklists with 8 robots each:

Theoretical picklist if I'm a feeder robot:
Code:

1114
118
2056
33
2826
1023
624
2338

Theoretical picklist if I'm a landfill robot:
Code:

2826
1023
624
1114
2056
1730
195
2338

It'll be interesting to see whether the top feeder robots that can't get 1114, 118, 33 or 2056 do first: pick a top tier feeder or the next best landfill.

carpedav000 09-07-2015 18:44

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard (Post 1489460)
Let's do some generic picklists with 8 robots each:

Theoretical picklist if I'm a feeder robot:
Code:

1114
118
2056
33
2826
1023
624
2338

Theoretical picklist if I'm a landfill robot:
Code:

2826
1023
624
1114
2056
1730
195
2338

It'll be interesting to see whether the top feeder robots that can't get 1114, 118, 33 or 2056 do first: pick a top tier feeder or the next best landfill.

I would say next best landfill because most of the feeder robots can put up at least 2 full stacks.

Kevin Leonard 10-07-2015 08:04

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carpedav000 (Post 1489492)
I would say next best landfill because most of the feeder robots can put up at least 2 full stacks.

Well if you look at the next best landfill robots: (1310, 3130, 1756, etc.), they can all make 2 stacks/match, and you're likely to get one of them in the second round. While the next best feeder robots are making 3 stacks/match.

So it depends on whether you believe you can get a good enough landfill machine in the second round, if you need specific attributes (tote stack auto, can grabbers), or if you think you need the consistency at the human player station more.

It also depends on whether teams have good scouting (and I've talked to a number of very good teams who don't have any scouting planned for IRI because they don't have the manpower. :yikes:)

The other Gabe 10-07-2015 15:28

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard (Post 1489538)
Well if you look at the next best landfill robots: (1310, 3130, 1756, etc.), they can all make 2 stacks/match, and you're likely to get one of them in the second round. While the next best feeder robots are making 3 stacks/match.

So it depends on whether you believe you can get a good enough landfill machine in the second round, if you need specific attributes (tote stack auto, can grabbers), or if you think you need the consistency at the human player station more.

It also depends on whether teams have good scouting (and I've talked to a number of very good teams who don't have any scouting planned for IRI because they don't have the manpower. :yikes:)

those teams should glean inspiration from here http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...hreadid=137681

Doug Frisk 10-07-2015 16:55

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Noudvanbrunscho (Post 1488532)
I don't know much about rules that will be changed? But i think with these kind of alliances we will see 300+ scores!?

You will see a ton of 300+ scores at IRI because they're adding a couple hundred extra points worth of green bins to the field. Virtually every team there can stack and cap, so seeing 7 or even 8 capped six stacks shouldn't be unexpected.

John Retkowski 10-07-2015 18:09

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DareDad (Post 1489612)
You will see a ton of 300+ scores at IRI because they're adding a couple hundred extra points worth of green bins to the field. Virtually every team there can stack and cap, so seeing 7 or even 8 capped six stacks shouldn't be unexpected.


When did +2 cans equal a couple hundred points? I think we'll definitely see a fair share of 300 point matches, but I'd be willing to say there will be a lot more that fall around 294.

Mike Marandola 10-07-2015 20:44

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by John Retkowski (Post 1489621)
When did +2 cans equal a couple hundred points? I think we'll definitely see a fair share of 300 point matches, but I'd be willing to say there will be a lot more that fall around 294.

You mean +4. There have been dozens of matches that totaled more than 200 where at least 4 RCs were used.

mipo0707 10-07-2015 21:02

Re: IRI Predictions
 
+2 cans plus the all stars of the game can definitely makes 300+ points possible
obv not every match but many and definitely playoffs

John Retkowski 10-07-2015 21:05

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Marandola (Post 1489635)
You mean +4. There have been dozens of matches that totaled more than 200 where at least 4 RCs were used.

.

I'm not sure I'm following you. I was under the impression we were talking about individual alliance scores. If you want to group entire match scores, the 300 point mark got broken awhile ago.

Mike Marandola 10-07-2015 23:13

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by John Retkowski (Post 1489639)
.

I'm not sure I'm following you. I was under the impression we were talking about individual alliance scores. If you want to group entire match scores, the 300 point mark got broken awhile ago.

I think DareDad was talking about the whole field but I think I was misunderstanding him also because 4 cans would still be worth only 168 points at most.

Doug Frisk 10-07-2015 23:59

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Marandola (Post 1489650)
I think DareDad was talking about the whole field but I think I was misunderstanding him also because 4 cans would still be worth only 168 points at most.

My bad. I was thinking there were 3 additional cans added per side, plus I was exaggerating a bit because the new cans are essentially available without effort.

But as for 300, the "bad" teams at IRI can put up 2 capped six stacks so at an alliance level, 42*6 or 252 is almost a baseline score. Add a 20 to 28 point auton and you're up at 270-280. If an alliance has one robot that can put up a third capped six stack it's over 300.

Abhishek R 11-07-2015 00:17

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DareDad (Post 1489658)
My bad. I was thinking there were 3 additional cans added per side, plus I was exaggerating a bit because the new cans are essentially available without effort.

But as for 300, the "bad" teams at IRI can put up 2 capped six stacks so at an alliance level, 42*6 or 252 is almost a baseline score. Add a 20 to 28 point auton and you're up at 270-280. If an alliance has one robot that can put up a third capped six stack it's over 300.

In reality you only have 5 cans available to your side easily; the first hurdle will be retrieving more cans from the step.

Many teams who can make 2-3 stacks do so with the already available cans, so even with the ones from the step teams have to manipulate those to whatever orientation they need and then proceed to stacking.

Furthermore, landfill robots are scarce, so often you will find a qualification alliance with three HP loading robots (or possibly vice versa, maybe you get multiple landfillers while there are only 3 stacks worth in the landfill). Such an alliance is limited to how much they can stack as an alliance as well.

I think 300 will definitely be broken multiple times, but I don't think it will be as often as some may think. Combined with the usual IRI factors like new drive teams, robot degradation over the season, etc. it will be a rare but exciting feat when it does happen.

thatprogrammer 11-07-2015 02:44

Re: IRI Predictions
 
I predict there will be 7 games that are 300+ points.

logank013 11-07-2015 11:08

Re: IRI Predictions
 
After doing th match, it seems that there are forty some double can burglars at IRI. Getting the two cans on the right every match should be simple. I bet most matches, each side will have 7 cans as long as they lign someone up to get the cans on the right.

carpedav000 11-07-2015 12:19

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by logank013 (Post 1489683)
After doing th match, it seems that there are forty some double can burglars at IRI. Getting the two cans on the right every match should be simple. I bet most matches, each side will have 7 cans as long as they lign someone up to get the cans on the right.

How many single can burglars (I count three so far [1741, 5188, 1720])

logank013 11-07-2015 13:30

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carpedav000 (Post 1489688)
How many single can burglars (I count three so far [1741, 5188, 1720])

Yeah. I messed that up. There are 26 Double can Burglars and 7 Single Can Burglars.

the 8 singles are 1024, 1720, 1741, and 5188 have consistent 1 step can autos
the 4 not so consistent robots are 5254, 2614, 2337, and 217

1024 is 1 can for IRI rules due to the fact they grab the 2 center cans

carpedav000 11-07-2015 13:41

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by logank013 (Post 1489694)
Yeah. I messed that up. There are 26 Double can Burglars and 7 Single Can Burglars.

the 8 singles are 1024, 1720, 1741, and 5188 have consistent 1 step can autos
the 4 not so consistent robots are 5254, 2614, 2337, and 217

1024 is 1 can for IRI rules due to the fact they grab the 2 center cans

I dont think 1024 is going to be using their burglars.

logank013 11-07-2015 13:46

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carpedav000 (Post 1489698)
I dont think 1024 is going to be using their burglars.

I don't see why not. Just take away the right can burglar (since they back up) and run the same auto. Or keep the right can burglar and change the auto, then, they would be able to scoop up the center can the other alliance missed in auto.

carpedav000 11-07-2015 13:56

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by logank013 (Post 1489700)
I don't see why not. Just take away the right can burglar (since they back up) and run the same auto. Or keep the right can burglar and change the auto, then, they would be able to scoop up the center can the other alliance missed in auto.

Wait... we're allowed to grab the cans the other alliance misses? The time has come for the 4-bar claw to shine!

logank013 11-07-2015 15:10

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by carpedav000 (Post 1489702)
Wait... we're allowed to grab the cans the other alliance misses? The time has come for the 4-bar claw to shine!

Yes. The left side can ban is only for autonomous mode from what I understand. The rule states "During the Autonomous period, the “Right side” (from the drivers station perspective) Recycle Containers on the step may only be contacted by the alliance facing them. After Autonomous, Recycle Containers remaining on the step are open to either alliance.

Kevin Leonard 14-07-2015 12:34

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Final pre-IRI predictions- this time with no explanations.

1114-2056-1325-4678 SF
118-624-2468-330 F
33-1625-225-2590 W
2826-1218-1640-4143
1730-1619-3824-125
2338-1023-195-3130 SF
1756-4039-68-1310
1806-2122-16-233

2015 IRI Champions: Killfire Winesis

Brian Maher 14-07-2015 12:49

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard (Post 1490163)
33-1625-225-2590 W

2015 IRI Champions: Killfire Winesis

With a name like that, you have me convinced.

One issue though: if I'm not mistaken, 2590 is the only chute door stacker on that alliance.

The other Gabe 14-07-2015 19:07

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BMSOTM (Post 1490165)
With a name like that, you have me convinced.

One issue though: if I'm not mistaken, 2590 is the only chute door stacker on that alliance.

extra weight= RAMPS!!!!!

because you're right, 3/4 bots prefer landfill, and 1 can't do feeder. it could work as an interesting strategy, though, with either 33 or 1625 clearing most of the landfill, leaving step totes for 225

John Retkowski 14-07-2015 21:59

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The other Gabe (Post 1490230)
extra weight= RAMPS!!!!!

because you're right, 3/4 bots prefer landfill, and 1 can't do feeder. it could work as an interesting strategy, though, with either 33 or 1625 clearing most of the landfill, leaving step totes for 225

That strategy doesn't seem like it would hold up. For starters lets say 33 or 1625 clears most of the landfill (heck the whole landfill even) and makes 3 stacks. Lets say 2590 makes 3 stacks from the feeder station. Why would you waste 225's talents on the step totes? There's not much benefit of having three landfill bots on an alliance of four unless one of them can adapt to feeder station. There's 42 totes to us back there. Using only 18 is just a shame.

Ben Martin 14-07-2015 22:47

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by John Retkowski (Post 1490251)
That strategy doesn't seem like it would hold up. For starters lets say 33 or 1625 clears most of the landfill (heck the whole landfill even) and makes 3 stacks. Lets say 2590 makes 3 stacks from the feeder station. Why would you waste 225's talents on the step totes? There's not much benefit of having three landfill bots on an alliance of four unless one of them can adapt to feeder station. There's 42 totes to us back there. Using only 18 is just a shame.


Here is how I would prefer to play this one, if we were lucky enough to be on this alliance:

For autonomous, 33 does their 3-tote, we do our upright can grab. We leave 2 cans in the auto zone, 33 is holding 1, for +8 points. There is also a potential option to have 1625 ready to can grab immediately in teleoperated mode if the other alliance misses a can.

33 is capable of 3 stacks of 6 out of the landfill, so I don't think 4 stacks from the feeder station with a long ramp is unreasonable as a possibility. 1625 also gets a long ramp. 33 gets 4 cans, 1625 gets three, and they both empty the feeder station. They don't have to waste any time can-hunting, since every can is already upright and sitting near the feeder stations. We put up 18-20 totes from the landfill/step, nicely stacked super dense on the very full scoring platforms.

In this scenario, there are 7 cans scored at level 6, 28 auto points, all the feeder station totes scored, and the equivalent or more of all the landfill totes scored. If it doesn't work out, pull us out, have one of the other robots do landfill, and put 2590 on feeder station.

I think the consistent robots with long ramps, active intakes, fast stacking, and lots of practice will go first in the draft, whether they normally play landfill or feeder station. Shout-out to 5254, who implemented this strategy at Midknight Mayhem to make stacks faster than anybody else at the competition.

AWoL 14-07-2015 23:33

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BMSOTM (Post 1490165)
One issue though: if I'm not mistaken, 2590 is the only chute door stacker on that alliance.

We've actually been working on that. After a good bit of drive practice we can put up 2 stacks minimum from both stations and can get closer to 3 on a good run, especially from the right chute door where the platform is close.

orangelight 14-07-2015 23:45

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard (Post 1490163)
Final pre-IRI predictions- this time with no explanations.

1114-2056-1325-4678 SF
118-624-2468-330 F
33-1625-225-2590 W
2826-1218-1640-4143
1730-1619-3824-125
2338-1023-195-3130 SF
1756-4039-68-1310
1806-2122-16-233

2015 IRI Champions: Killfire Winesis

No 548 :ahh:

jajabinx124 15-07-2015 00:34

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard (Post 1490163)
Final pre-IRI predictions- this time with no explanations.

1114-2056-1325-4678 SF
118-624-2468-330 F
33-1625-225-2590 W
2826-1218-1640-4143
1730-1619-3824-125
2338-1023-195-3130 SF
1756-4039-68-1310
1806-2122-16-233

2015 IRI Champions: Killfire Winesis

125 isn't attending IRI. The list of attending teams for IRI was updated yesterday on the IRI invitation thread.

Brian Maher 15-07-2015 01:23

Re: IRI Predictions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by orangelight (Post 1490269)
No 548 :ahh:

Quote:

Originally Posted by jajabinx124 (Post 1490273)
125 isn't attending IRI. The list of attending teams for IRI was updated yesterday on the IRI invitation thread.

Well, that makes for an easy switch :p


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:23.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi