![]() |
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
Quote:
One of the items I'm thinking of adding happens to be the capability to recognize "Random" and "Rookie" so a list that has those will automatically send to the randomizer or send to the randomizer and only take the rookie teams. |
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
So what lists are we using for the District Drafts?
|
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
Quote:
I also just updated the season long list of FF picks here. All picks, trades, and waiver teams are up to date.* *Excluding TBC's unnamed swap for 120 at Buckeye, still waiting on that ;) |
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
Quote:
|
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
By the way, I will be opening up MAR Day 1 on 12/31, a full 2 days ahead of the scheduled time. I'll be a little busy at draft time, I think, but if we take a couple of days to work through Day 1, it won't be as big a deal.
|
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
I have a question about district scoring: according to the rules page given at the start of this thread, scoring for teams in district drafts is the average of their scores for all district events.
Quote:
|
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
Quote:
|
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
I had to take myself off of the MI draft entirely I have too many conflicts popping up to run it. Hopefully someone else can run it.
|
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
Quote:
EDIT: After looking through the draft runner sheet, I think I can do this. I'll do it. |
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
So with the help of the RFA data base i have begun updating the drafts but while going through them a thought crossed my mind about an update the to the waiver rules:
Lockout Period: If a team has competed at an event the previous week they are given temporary on-waiver status until 2 days following the event. Why the change: In order to avoid a scenario where an unexpected team does exceedingly well at their first (or second) event and someone picks them for all their subsequent events just by being quicker to the keyboard, it will still give priority to the teams at the top of the waiver queue. It isn't a big change and it shouldn't result in much headaches for who ever is running the waiver wire but it makes being at the top of the waiver list still worth while, and makes picking up said teams more fair for the whole league. Just a thought that crossed my mind that we may want to implement. |
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
Quote:
|
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
Quote:
|
Re: [FF]: 2016 Season Long Fantasy FIRST
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:48. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi