IRI Feedback Thread
 

DISCLAIMER: I am in no way associated with IRI but I know people on delphi are so this thread may be of help to them.

So with a little bit of time passed between the competition and now I figured a feedback thread may be in order. These are just off the top of my head:

Positives:
- The rule changes, though removing the can wars did take away the only direct competition between the sides, they actually made me enjoy this game for the first time this season.

- Lawrence North Highschool may very well be my favorite venue in all of FIRST, if there ever comes a time where a school for FRC is made Lawrence North should be the template

- The volunteers at IRI are the only ones at any competition I have been to where they all feel like they are their for the teams and the good of FIRST, as well as not having a single bad interaction with event staff for only the third time in my FRC history (The other 2 being my previous IRIs)

- The food cost (with the exception of 1 type which I will highlight later) was the best in FIRST and other offseasons should take a page out of the IRI book about that.

- Teams all seemed to be in great moods, the best I have seen this season.


Negatives

- The team dinner could have used a little more food, 2 pieces of chicken were not enough for some members of my team, myself included. And the lemonade was warm for my first glass though the second was much better.

- The drinks were a little expensive when compared to the cost of food.


That is really it for the negatives, and they are so minor that I had to complain about free food and $2 Powerade which is still cheaper then at South Florida. I think IRI is the standard all offseasons should strive for, not just in terms of competitiveness but also in terms of how it is run, the atmosphere and the people involved.

So what is some of the feedback from other attendees, or from people who watched at home on the stream, not only could this thread help IRI but I am also interested in if everyone else enjoyed it as much as I did.

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

Positives: It's IRI. 'nuff said.

Negatives: The flow should have went out the back end. It would have made everybody's lives easier.

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

Positive - The web cast was excellent.

Negative - Killed my productivity on Saturday.

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

Positives:
The best of the best came to play. I think I saw more IRI upgrades than ever before, and the rule changes let the game really advance to the level I think many teams expected it to be earlier on.
I love the relaxed IRI atmosphere. No one is rushing you on and off the field, no one is yelling "robot" throughout the pits. It's the epitome of what a FIRS experience should be.
On that note, the music was at an appropriate level, whereas at most FRC events its a little too loud.
Commentary was knowledgeable, and the matches were intense.

Negatives:
The lower concessions stand and the corn selling stand end way too early on Saturday. When I finally have a little time to breath and eat on Saturday because my team either got eliminated or wasn't picked, two of the concessions close. The upstairs one is still open, thank goodness, but I miss out on more delicious Indiana corn!

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

Positives: Livestream quality was excellent. Commentary and interviews made the viewing experience like a well produced TV sports event, GA/MC work was the best of the season, volunteers made everything run like clockwork, and the competing teams showed us how RR was meant to be played -- and at last could be played, after the PC fixed some flaws in the game rules.

Negatives: none that I could see, from out here in viewer-land.

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

Negatives: We fell pretty short of winning.

Positives: We won just by being there. It was awesome and humbling to be around many of the best teams in the world. Also it was pretty cool when Chris Fultz(I think it was him) put out a cheese cake on a table along with a pile of forks, and I got to eat a bite alongside Billfred. :D

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

Pros: The live stream was excellent.

Cons: Lack of robot awards(?)

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

Regarding the webcast, why was it blurry near the edges (beginning near the staging zones)? The resolution and playback was very nice, however. And IRI LIVE is something I wish every event had.

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

Thanks for starting this thread and please feel free to add comments to this or send them to me as a PM. We push for continuous improvement and it is beneficial to know what teams like and where we can do better.

I will try to comment on some of the comments -

Dinner - we try to balance having enough food for everyone with not wasting a lot of extra food (and money). Since we invite anyone who is at the event to stay, we have to set some limits. And, at the end, there was a basket of chicken left on the table for anyone to get "seconds".

Drinks - i will share the comment with the concession crew.

Concessions closing - I will share the comment with the concession crew.

Webcast field view - we had to use a standard video camera for the full field view to be compatible with the video resolution of the field side camera and IRI Live camera. The original plan was a GoPro and we could not get them all to the same resolution in a reliable manner. For 2016, we will have more time to work on the full field camera options to get cleaner edges.

Awards - several years ago we stopped doing robot awards. We found most teams were ready to go as soon as matches ended on Saturday, and didn't want to stay around for another hour of an awards ceremony. Also, by not having any pit judged awards, no students have to spend two days in the pits waiting for judges to come by - they can all be out enjoying the event.

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

What we do with Rah Cha Cha Ruckus is have the awards done by the teams instead of judges. You can give out the robot awards between matches. There is such excellent engineering on display it deserves to be rewarded.

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

Positive - Excellent Stream

Negative - Stream only had one quality setting causing it to cut out for me at times.

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

As a student attending IRI, I was glad there were no awards. Especially since only eight students on our team could attend (due to the timing in the summer and the distance from Idaho), we would not have appreciated having to keep anybody in the pits for two days waiting for a five-minute discussion. And since so many teams at IRI had amazing robots, it could have been a travesty to only recognize a few. At least in my opinion, awards belong at official events (or even the more local off-season events) where the best robots stand out better, and teams are more likely to have the bandwidth to devote students and time to competing for them.

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

This was my second year attending this event. In general, all was great. Our team puts on an off-season event too, so I appreciate the effort that goes into organizing everything.

My only negative was the heat. In the stands and the pits, it was almost unbearable. There were a couple areas in the building you could retreat to for some cooling off, but it took you away from being able to watch the competition. I know it was hot outside and I'm sure it was pushing the AC units but it was hot on arrival in the mornings which meant it only got hotter as the day went on.

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

I'm not even going to bother listing all of the positives (there are so many), but instead I have two negatives. My first negative may only be a driver thing (I wasn't in the stands at all) but it was HOT on the field. I had to wipe sweat and de-fog my safety glasses every couple minutes. My second negative is the flow of getting on and off the field. Really inefficient at using time wisely. Other than those two things, IRI was a ton of fun!

Re: IRI Feedback Thread
 

I agree with all of the positives and the event was a lot of fun overall, but my team did have some negative experiences on the field. A number of times when we were trying to set up we either had to wait for our partners to place their robots and then move out of the way or (on the blue side) wait for the previous match's robots to get off the field and take their robots away. This itself was not a problem, but it meant that by the time we were able to start actually setting up our robot the field crew gave us very little time (twice only about ten seconds) before they told us we had to get off the field immediately. Then, as we returned to the driver station, we twice had the match started very quickly while we were still touching the controls to set up our dashboard and select which autonomous routine to run (If there was a warning or countdown, we didn't hear it). So we were frustrated that we often were not set up where we wanted to be, couldn't run autonomous, and/or had to start teleop by finishing setting values on the dashboard before we started driving.