Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I couldn't find an image showing the current districts on a us map. So I made one.

Hopefully people can use this to not only speculate which states switch over to districts for 2017, but the new boundaries for the districts.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

No image for me (using Chrome).

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Does this work?

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Thanks, I can see the map in post 3, but not post 1.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Yep, that works.

But Alaska should be red, as I've heard from various CD denizens that AK will be in PNW this next year.


And the other thought I've been having: Poor SC. Surrounded by districts...But I think they'll be all right as long as Smoky and the Forida regionals are still around.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Fixed Alaska in both links above. They are going to have a long drive to PNW champs.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Only showing NA, Ontario is ripe for district, They already have many regionals that are sized almost at the district level size (40) but paying for 2 regionals.

Districts are great, everyone should get some. Jump in, the water is good.

Once New York figures things out we can have a large connected region in the east.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

This part of your comment got me thinking and made me realize that Israel might make for a good district. With 55 teams at the Israel Regional (all of which are Israeli), Israel is just the right size for an Indiana style small district. This would give all the Israeli teams the chance to compete at two events, which few get a chance to. Some teams would get a third or fourth event without traveling internationally.

Israel is a small dense cluster of teams, far from any other team density. It seems like a perfect district candidate.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I would personally like to see a Midwest District,

• Kansas
• Oklahoma
• Texas
• Nebraska (no teams yet)
• South Dakota
• North Dakota
• Colorado
• Missouri

But that might be a huge district.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Way too big, by a factor of a lot. BTW, if Colorado is included you'll need to include Wyoming and at least part of Montana as that's the current closest event to teams in that area.

You're probably better off with "Northern Midwest", "Texas" (who, I might add, is beginning to look seriously at districts from some CD posts this year), and "everybody else". "Northern Midwest" would be the Dakotas, Wyoming, Colorado, and Nebraska if they form any teams. (There's a natural split point in the Dakotas that might send some portions of those two states to join MN/WI/IA if those three went district, but that's outside the scope of this discussion.) "Everybody else" takes OK, KS, and MO and possibly adds in Arkansas for the district zone.


The reason I say it's way too big: Can you really imagine driving for TWO DAYS to get not quite all the way across ONE district? Neither can I. And I know from experience that it's a two-day drive from the teams in South Dakota to Fort Worth, Texas. Not that anybody would do that for districts, you understand, but just the sheer size of the proposition.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Ontario, Texas, Minnesota, Florida, and California make sense to me.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I think we'll need to wait for more a FRC presence in Quebec/Eastern Canada first. The Eastern Ontario event is well traveled to by Montreal teams, and they'll only have one event that can qualify them for Worlds (because NE is a district as well). If they get a second regional, then Ontario should immediately move to districts.

Florida and Minnesota both make sense, and I'm sure we'll see those two move in the next two years. California makes the most sense split into Northern and Southern. Someone more familiar with the size and distribution of Texas teams should comment on Texas, I don't know enough about the region.

Just my opinions.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Florida, regretfully, will probably be one of the last holdouts for districts. The size and makeup of the state geographically along with the decline of teams hurts that chances pretty hard.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I understand your opinion and the districts system would be awesome here in MN, but IMO Minnesota isn't going to districts anytime soon. From what I've heard, MN has issues getting enough volunteers for the 4 regionals we have in our state, so thinking about districts and the number of events that may need to be put up for districts here is insane.

Maybe in the next 5 or so years it may switch to districts.. but that's just my guess.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

CA going district--in whole or in part--is going to be an interesting experience, IF it ever happens. With 7 regionals, including one of the largest in the country, last year, and I want to say less than 7 open spots last year, it's very crowded. Splitting north/south will also be quite interesting: believe it or not, the split would likely be about 2/3 of the way down the state geographically, but would split the current regionals 3/4 north/south. (There aren't a lot of teams in the far north third of the state, to put it mildly.)


OTOH, I think an awful lot of CA teams will be pretty happy whenever it happens. More playing time and all that.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Half the issue of volunteers in Minnesota is that there are only 2 weekends available. Many volunteers won't compete at an event their team is at, so they can't volunteer anywhere if their team does 2 Minnesota events. If the 4 regionals were on four separate weeks I'd better you'd see many more volunteers appear.

The fifth Minnesota regional will probably help disperse the teams and actually free up some volunteers.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I don't know whether there will be a 5th MN regional. The new Iowa regional is technically the "5th MN regional" I think.. I think the MN volunteer base is going to be heavily involved with helping set up/run the new Iowa regional, but this will help free up some volunteers hopefully and give IO, MN, MO, etc. teams another choice for a regional to attend.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

The other half of the issue is that we have such a young volunteer base. While having more volunteer weekends available increase the number of raw volunteers, it won't change the fact that we only have so many key volunteers. I just don't see us getting enough key volunteers in just 2 years... and this from somebody who desperately wants to change to districts.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

The thing is, this is the same concern that every region switching to districts has. No one has a cache of people sitting around to step in and take all of the additional volunteer spots that are added in the switch. Unfortunately, until you make the switch you won't have the volunteer base you need.

Build it and they will come.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I'd like an Ohio/Eastern Kentucky/Western PA/West Virginia district, but the problem is volunteers in the region. For some reason, we just can't get enough of them to run a good district.

I can definitely see either a SoCal+Arizona and a NorCal+Nevada district, or just a combined California (but that is A LOT of driving...we drove from SF to San Diego on our honeymoon, and I would NOT want to drive it for a competition). I'm surprised Texas isn't already a district. New York+Southern Ontario is a possibility as well, but I'm sure that district would get swallowed up by the Canadian teams there, so I'm not sure how much New York would really WANT to be in that district.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I keep hearing Illinois will eventually. I think ideally Indiana, Illinois, and southern Wisconsin should join up.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Forgive me, for some reason neither of the images are showing up for me on either of my computers, probably the school blocking it. I'm from Kansas City, and from a few looks of great scrutiny at the US FIRST website, I could not find the GKC Regional on the list for this year. Am I simply not seeing it? Or is there no GKC Regional this year?

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Not all events are confirmed/posted on the FIRST webpage. You'll find that many other regionals are still missing, as well. Once a contract is signed with the venue, it should be on the webpage. According to this post, GKC is happening and will be week 2.

For future reference, questions like that can be posted in the regional competitions sub-forum or the regional dates thread.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

The last statement is a little misleading yes Florida has less teams then our peak but lets look at the long term situation say 5 years:

2011: 55 Teams
2012: 76 (+21, The first year of the South Florida Regional, the last year of the JC Penny Grant)
2013: 72 (-4, No more JC Penny grant, NASA removes some grants for South Florida, South Florida moves to a more expensive location)
2014: 63 (-9, Rookie Teams from 2012 can no longer receive the grants from NASA based on age)
2015: 64 (+1)

So over the last 5 years we have had a net gain of 9 teams not spectacular but still not an overall loss. Also in 2015 50% of our teams attended 2 or more regionals while in 2011 that number was 18%, yes there wasn't a second event in our state at the time but it shows that half of our teams are already paying near the $10,000 required for districts and district championships.

Florida is closer to being able to sustain districts then our loss of 12 teams in 4 years say especially with a possible 3 off season events potentially leading to an increase of volunteer base. That being said your statement about geography as well as the way our highschools are designed (very open and airy lacking space big enough to host districts) lead to our issues.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

The problem with MN's constant maybe in a couple of years is that as every year passes it gets harder and harder to make the transition. Every time another 16-20 teams is added it means another event is required. The 195 teams they had last season is already past the point that I consider a good size for start up. With 195 teams you need 390 plays at a minimum. So 390/36= 10.8 events and 11 events is the most I would want to do the first season so that you can have a single event week one to work all the bugs out. Now if you can find enough venues that can hold 40 teams you can get away with a start up number of 220 teams but you are preventing any additional plays at that point. Once you exceed 240 teams you will need at least one week with 3 events.

Because they are only 2 day events and there are fewer volunteers needed at a 36-40 team event than at a 60 team event it is about as easy to come up with enough volunteers to run 2 district events as it is one large Regional. Because there will be more dates to choose from your base of potential volunteers increases significantly. No the volunteer count doesn't scale perfectly since there are a number of positions that need the same number of people no matter how big the event is, for example you need 1 LRI no matter the number of teams but you need fewer RIs the smaller the event. Assuming that as others have speculated that a lot of the MN contingent is going to cross the boarder for the new 5th event in the general vicinity and you are basically there with your volunteer base. Getting volunteers at DCMP is relatively easy because a huge number of the people who did a district event want to be at the big show.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Agreed, we have turned the tide of team losses, have 3 coordinated off season events, and the volunteer base at south florida is more and more a different group than in orlando. Locations are a problem, but I doubt it would be impossible to find the right ones. Florida is on its way to districts, but it'll take some time to get there. And while we still have many hurdles to cross, the signs are finally starting to be good, which they haven't been for a long while.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

What a few Michigan districts do is require teams to provide volunteers in order to attend the competition... for example we had to provide one volunteer each day of the competition last year.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Now this isn't robotics, but I'm also involved on my school's Speech Team. For that, we need to bring a judge (a volunteer) for every 5 students we bring. I'm sure state FIRSTs' could implement a rule like that if needed in that state.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

My point was, using the excuse that there aren't enough volunteers means they will never make the switch. Supply and demand, if the demand for volunteers isn't there the supply won't grow.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Minnesota would need 15 district events just for the teams in Minnesota. If only Minnesota teams were allowed it would orphan the teams in North Dakota, northern Iowa and north/western Wisconsin. Add those teams into the district and there would need to be 17 to 18 districts minimum. Minnesota would be running 3 or 4 events per weekend during competition season.

You can't expect the key volunteers to work for six weekend straight. To make districts work you need six or more event leads, FTAs, FTAAs, Head Refs, Lead Queuers, Pit Admins, Lead Robot Inspectors, Judge coordinators, Lead Safety inspectors and probably a couple more I'm forgetting. That's fifty plus people all making a commitment to train and work four weekends during competition season.

Minnesota has some really committed key volunteers. But it's a small group that's maybe a third of what would be needed. Right now its a group of people who do Duluth's double regional and then Minneapolis' double regional. I've already committed to Iowa next year and I expect there will be enough of the core group that the key positions there would be covered.

It's the minor volunteers that are where Minnesota has trouble, and that I suspect has to do with the size of the events which have all of the teams in the area competing, so most of the natural volunteers are already occupied.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

By having your smaller events spread out you are also able to tap into a larger volunteer supply. It's more difficult to convince people to travel and pay for a hotel to go volunteer for an event than it is to get them to volunteer for one in their own back yard.

According to the MN numbers last year you'd need 11 events based on a 40 team max per event.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Minnesota's growth in recent years has slowed. We've reached a temporary plateau, but I don't expect that it will hold. There are a lot of potential teams to the northwest of the cities. However, with that said I don't think switching to districts will become more difficult over time. The oldest, active Minnesota team is just going into their 11th season. A lot of younger teams are just starting to figure things out and provide volunteers for events.

Also from conversations with smarter people than myself, I've learned that running an event of any size requires a pretty similar amount of volunteers. Especially key volunteers as you stated. That's without even considering the workload of the volunteer coordinator...

Assuming you do need to run 2 events per week for 6 weeks rather than our current 5 events (counting Iowa) during 3 different weeks, that's 7 more events in total. Focusing solely on key volunteers, it would require more than double the current number if they maintain the same workload. It's not feasible for an LRI to take 6 weekends off to help run an event.

TL;DR: As Minnesota gets older, the number of key volunteers will go up, which is the limiting factor for going to districts. The non-key volunteers will be there when we need them.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I agree. See below.

MN 192
WI 41
IA 9
Dakotas 5
Total Teams 247

Max Number of Teams per Event
40

Number of Events Needed
12.35

Number of spots (13 events): 520

Volunteer quality would suffer for the first year (like it has in just about every other area that has transitioned to districts) but it would recover after that.

More importantly, what MN is lacking currently is a non-profit running FRC in the state. We have a few organizational issues we need to fix before anything else.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

As Matthew pointed out, there were 218 MN teams in 2015... you need a district event for every 20 teams, so that's a minimum of 11, not 15.

Agreed that you can't expect the key volunteers to work for six straight weekends... BUT you're only in need of enough staffing to run 12-14 events (including DCMP; 14 would include surrounding states)... maybe that's 4 key volunteers each working 3 or 4 weekends or 3 key volunteers each working 4 or more weekends. At any rate, I think Matthew's spot on with his "If you build it, they will come..." more volunteers - including key volunteers - will step up as need arises.

I'll also kindly point out that there have been a diverse group of regions to go to districts... none of them have suffered from the change and I've hardly heard anyone saying "I wish we were still going to regionals." Look at the PNW as an example of a large region geographically with tight population pockets that also lacked the "region age" that Michigan or New England have... the PNW has definitely benefited from the change!

Also, it seems to me that FIRST HQ is really pushing regions to go to districts... a few years ago they were hoping most of FIRST would be in districts in 2016; it's more, but not nearly as much as they were expecting!

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

You are assuming that each district events will host the maximum 40 teams. I'm assuming 30 as an average. Have you located 11 venues that have the space and power needed to host 40 team events?

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

If you look you'll see that the average district size is closer to the mid to high 30's.

You can get creative with venues, space and schedule are your only limiting factors. Power can be brought in.

I'm also assuming that since there are currently 2 off-season events in MN that there are at least 2 planning committees that would be willing to assist in planning district events.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Does anyone else worry about the effect felt if a region goes from having 4 regionals that you could "win" to having one main champion style event that you can "win"? I guess you get 12ish events that can be "won", but, as I have not yet played in a district, I wonder about the different in experience when winning these events.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

As a few other people have noted here, the issue isn't so much sheer number of bodies to fill volunteer roles as much as reliable volunteers to fill key roles.

It is a work in progress, but it isn't going to happen over night. As of the 2015 FRC season, we had 1 returning FTA, 1 new FTA, 1 local FTAA, a handful (4 or 5?) scorekeepers, 1 local field supervisor, and 1 field supervisor from Iowa.

That's obviously just a couple of the key positions, and some of them (LRIs) we now have a fairly healthy number of. However, people can't just show up and start volunteering for these roles. Many of these roles require a high level of familiarity with FRC, a high level of interpersonal skills, and a high level of commitment to volunteering with the program. Once we have identified those people, we need at least a year to train them in for their role.

As Mr. V's post touched on, I think the biggest issue is that we grew incredibly quickly. The majority of our participants since when MN launched its first regional are either in college or only a couple years out of college. Obviously the rapid growth isn't a "problem" we can fix in MN- it is already done. What we can do is continue to work towards fixing our immediate problem, which is getting more volunteers and making some MN FIRST organizational changes to better support the program.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

At R2OC this year Dan Green said they're pushing for Illinois to switch for the 2017 season, but that they want more teams first. I think he said the goal was to grow IL's current 58 teams to 65 before they switch.

I think it would be great for southern/eastern Wisconsin to join IL, but it seems like FIRST doesn't want states split like that anymore. Realistically, though, splitting Wisconsin diagonally so the northwest joins MN and the southeast joins IL is the only real way we could enter the district system, unless we add something like 20 teams. Wisconsin only had 41 teams last season, and the team distribution doesn't really help.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

All of IL and WI could combine, although it might be a pain for NW Wisconsin/SW Illinois teams. It would make the rumored IL district more viable, and would make the MN/IA/WI district more manageable in terms of volunteers and team locations.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

From the point of a view of a student in Indiana, prior to the 2015 season (as in Spring 2014), we were under the impression that Illinois and Indiana were going to form a district together. Not sure why that plan changed, but it probably was through FIRST mediating their smaller district trial and IndianaFIRST's and Illinois FIRST's own discussion.

As for coming years, I think that an Iowa/Illinois district makes more sense than Wisconsin/Illinois geographically. The Iowa teams may have to travel quite a bit, but then, when don't they?;) Adding Missouri in would also be pretty easy if they wanted it to be a larger Midwest district, since there would be enough teams/events that Chicago teams won't have to go to Southwest Missouri or vice versa. Also, St. Louis would be a great place for a Midwest DCMP.

Obviously, volunteer base would have to be flexible and available for such a large (area) district to work out with a lower team density than, for example, Michigan. Also, I would be sorry for Wisconsin if that district happened along with Minnesota.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

So, my team is from Michigan (where I think the district replaced 3 regionals). Though we never won or made finals at a regional prior to districts, I have to say that making at least the finals at a district event is still a fantastic feeling. (I mean, we did that this year beating a 2014 world champion. Districts in no way feel "cheap".)

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I would be surprised if at least Missouri & Kansas aren't in a common district by 2017. Kansas doesn't have enough teams to survive on their own and their closest regional is in Missouri as well.

Illinois is wanting to form their own district, but hopefully by 2017 we will have inter-district play. There are a few Illinois teams that always attend the St. Louis regional because it's less than 30 minutes away for them and I'd hate to see them have to travel 2 - 3 hours just to attend one event.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

How did you calculate the need for 15 events? I show 192 teams for last season. That would mean 10 events for 40 team events or 11 events for 36 team events and 12 events for 32 team events. Even with 10% growth you would be covered with 2 events per weekend and 36 or more teams per event. Wait another year and you'll find you are stuck with starting off with those 3 event weekends and that is when you get into big trouble as a start up in my opinion.

The non key event volunteers are easy. As mentioned you can require teams to provide volunteers like MI does or just ask nicely. We've done pretty good rounding out the volunteers for most events by just asking teams if they can provide someone.

In my opinion this year MN really really needs to push for people who want to be key volunteers in the District system and have them shadow the existing key volunteers. It would also be a good idea to strongly encourage mentors from the influential teams and key volunteers to attend district events in one of the current districts that is most convenient for them. The earlier you start preparing the easier the transition will be. The longer you say we aren't ready the longer it will be until you are ready and the harder it will be.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Im still trying to figure out why IN went to districs. We are waaay to small IMO to be a district.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I think this is the big thing that gets missed in discussions about Minnesota going to Districts. Right now, the organizational structure for FRC in Minnesota is at best opaque and at worst comes off as exclusionary to teams outside the Twin Cities area, at least at the decision making level.

From where I'm standing (at the bottom, looking straight up, and without any inside knowledge) Minnesota needs some sort of exterior push to go to districts-- the system we have now is hindering us from progressing to districts. When we only have two weekends in the state with events, it makes it much easier to keep the same volunteers (and teams), which is a double edged sword-- it means the volunteers we do have tend to be very well seasoned and well trained, but it makes it much more difficult to train new volunteers, both in the practical sense that the slots for our existing regionals seem to be mostly filled, but also that from a team's perspective there isn't a need for them to be volunteering when everything seems to be under control.

On a little bit less of a concrete of a note, I also get the feeling that at the decision making level, there simply isn't much support within Minnesota for districts. I might be wrong (like I said, I'm pretty far outside the know for this), but that's the impression I've gotten.

We have a lot of talented and invested people here in Minnesota that currently aren't being utilized for FRC-- a sponge can only hold so much water. Maybe if we had a bigger sponge, we'd have more room for volunteers and a bit more diversity with who's filling volunteer positions.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Speaking as one of the individuals actively working to increase key volunteers (specifically LRI's) across MN... it's not as easy as people seem to think. We get plenty of inspectors, but not all inspectors would make for good LRI's. Since I became an LRI here, I've worked every year (literally) to identify and train new LRI's. You can identify someone who might be good for it one year, work the next year to train them, and then, finally, get them in charge of an event... but even then we do everything we can to have another experienced LRI there to back them up in case something horrible goes wrong. So, realistically, it takes another 2 seasons after you've identified someone before they're really running on their own. It's part of our focus on providing high quality events - throw someone into a situation they aren't completely prepared for, and the outcome won't be as good for the teams.

Now, all that said, I'm (personally) finally getting to the point where I can see the light at the end of the tunnel. For the first time EVER, we'll have 4 different LRI's FROM MINNESOTA in charge of the 4 Minnesota events. All previous years, we've imported LRI's from Wisconsin or doubled up. I also have a couple of people identified for training this year so we can have them ready to go when districts hits (whenever that is, I have no information on that!).

But that's just one key volunteer position. As Tanis said, we only have 2 FTA's returning for this year, and last I heard only 1 Head Ref.

Lets put it this way... would you want to attend a district with a head ref who got the job because someone was desperately needed for the position, or one who got the job because they had been reffing for years and were identified as a good fit for the position?

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Trust me, there's still plenty of room for more people to volunteer, especially in key roles. The only reason it seems that "all the slots are taken" is because people are pulling double duty all over the place filling those roles both in Duluth and Minneapolis... and they're only doing that because we need them to in order to get the events to run. We're desperately looking for people with the "right stuff" to hold those key volunteer roles and doing our best to train them in when we do identify them. Unfortunately, they don't grow on trees.

Speaking of the discussions I've had with others helping to run things here, the common theme is "Districts are coming... and we're not ready yet". We're working on it.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

To be clear, I'm not claiming that it's easy (it's pretty obvious that it's harder than I can fathom or try to solve through writing words on the internet). I just think that it might be the case that Minnesota isn't organized in a way that makes it easy to train volunteers quickly (both inside and outside regionals). Add that to the exterior perception that there's a lot of robot politics going on that make it difficult to volunteer in a meaningful way, and at least from the outside looking in, the path seems unclear at best for how we'll actually get to districts, regardless of all the fantastic people currently involved with volunteering at FRC events here.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

whatever happened to getting at least northern idaho into the PNW district? The last few times just this year it seems the idea is brought up,gets a little headway, then just disappears without a trace.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

You know, if I was in your shoes, I might consider volunteering at a position that might allow you to move up towards one of those key positions in a few years.

Getting someone fully trained and ready isn't really easy anywhere. According to FIRST's own guidelines, I could apply for a head ref position at a regional; I've got the two years (at two events/year in my case) and most if not all of the rest of the requirements. According to me, I ain't anywhere near ready for that yet! (And I'd bet the other refs I've worked with--including the head refs--would say the same thing.) I figure maybe a couple more years before I even try to put in for that, if I ever do.

But, the primary reason I started reffing was because I figure that once districts arrive out here, a lot of refs are going to be needed. I haven't been wrong, though that's been because the first year was AA, and last year was a new event. (I added a second event late in both years.)

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Funny enough, that's exactly what I've been doing. I started volunteering this past year with FTC and, time permitting, plan to do the same this year. The key thing being that "time permitting"-- as a student I don't know my schedule for FRC's season until at the earliest November, and at the latest January, after trying to switch things around to make volunteering a possibility. I have a great deal of love for FRC, and last year I did a great deal of work to make it possible for me to volunteer at two regionals and Championships, plus an FTC Super Regional, but as I'm pretty sure anyone who volunteers at events knows, sometimes it simply isn't possible for it to work, and that's even more of an issue for college students who are passionate about the program and want to stay involved.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Michigan had 2 head refs to cover 3 regionals in 2008.

We went to 7 district events in 2009 (plus MSC) - added one new head ref, and imported at least one head ref from outside MI to cover one of the events.

In 2010 we still had 7 district events, but now had 4 head refs - 2 new, one retired.

Last year we had 18 district events, 8 head refs (2 new).

So most of us do 2 or 3 events, plus MSC.

Now FTA's - we have a couple insane ones who work every weekend!

My point is, you can develop key volunteers as you expand. It would be a big jump the first year for MN, simply because of the size - they should have gone to districts 2 or 3 years ago. But I understand why they didn't, because they had so many new rookie teams in the years prior, they couldn't handle districts then. If they don't go to districts soon, though, the initial implementation will only get worse.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

If Illinois is switching to districts they should consider adding Wisconsin into that district too. They share a population center (fairly) near Chicago, and could use it as a central location for the District Championship.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Are you sure the key volunteers are only doing two events because they have to? Every single key volunteer I've ever met does multiple events because they love volunteering and would be there anyway even if they weren't needed.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Personally, I would be content with having a lower-quality head ref at my events for one year if that meant we could get to districts faster. Even if one whole district event of mine is completely ruined by a series of stupid calls, I would still participate in another whole event as well as (possibly) district championships were we in the district system, which is more than most teams have currently with one regional.

I'm probably in the minority here though.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Funny, that's how it is out here too. It also, for some reason, breeds consistency between events when the LRIs for later events drop in on earlier events to help out for a day (and the same for head referees). I can't quite figure that out ;).

That being said, most of them (out here) aren't in the key spot for all of their events. That makes life a bit easier on them, I think.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

IN and IL were supposed to form a district. From my understanding IL decided they weren't ready.

IN had been preparing for the change and when IL said not this year they convinced FIRST to let them pilot the mini-district model which they did very well with.

As I've said in the past WFR really really wants the N. ID teams to join. Summer 2014 FIRST agreed to that plan. N. ID teams got together and decided/were convinced to not join the PNW district. Come the week before registration they changed their mind and everything was a go for the 2016 season. In the mean time plans to put a Regional in Boise popped up (not that I've seen it show up on in the system) which took the N. ID team out of eligibility to join the PNW at least for the time being.

On the plus side AK is joining PNW for the 2016 season! OK so it is only one team. They decided they wanted in, they asked WFR and we said yes they asked FIRST and they said Yes with the caveat that they need to commit long term and not decide next year that they want to go back to the Regional system. Presumably if a new team pops up in AK they will be required to join the District system.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I'm happy to see our Alaskan friends joining us in the PNW, but this has the potential to really stifle team growth in Alaska for a while. Two travel events with a reasonable likelihood of a third would be a tough sell for most schools.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Not just regular travel either; AIR travel.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

On the other hand, I rather suspect that a particularly good (read: persuasive) teacher/set of teachers could justify spending the entire week between back-to-back events "down there" in an extended field trip. This would include such items as college visits, some trips to museums of things that might not be available back home, plenty of homework time, and any other items deemed educational by administration, faculty, and parents.

This would probably depend a lot on the school and parents agreeing, however. And I'm really not sure they could pull the same trick if they qualified for DCMP; CMP would certainly be a bit of a buzzkill on that.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

AK really hasn't been on an expansion tear so I don't think that there is a big risk there.

And how did the AK team get to their events before, it certainly wasn't driving or a boat. Fact is traveling to Seattle is much cheaper and is quicker too than their other options. Hotels around where we hold most of our events are also much cheaper than the CA events they have been attending. So 2 events for not much more than the one they had been attending. The current team obviously thought it was a good deal or they wouldn't have asked to come to the rainy PNW instead of continuing in the Regional system.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Well, in theory, they could go to the Week 4 and 5 district events, as well as the Week 6 DCMP all at once. CMP would be hard to pull off, definitely.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Point made and I agree, but they'll still have to house themselves in a hotel for weeks at a time, in addition to the two round-trip flights, assuming they make it to Championship again. However, you're right, it has to either save more money/provide more educational benefit.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

If definitely will get harder if MN waits too long. As it is they can handle things with less than 12 events, and better yet less than 11. Once the team count gets too high depending on the size of venues that are willing and fit with in the schedule you get into a situation where there needs to be 3 events on the same weekend. Now you really do have a volunteer problem and an infrastructure problem needing to worry about 3 fields worth of equipment or renting the stuff which increases the cost of an event dramatically.

The other thing is that a district event is 2/3 the length and many are on Sat/Sun and are potentially closer to home. So a person can take off the same time form work or less to volunteer at 2 district events vs 1 Regional. Since they are potentially closer to home that also means no or less cost for lodging. Add in the fact that you now have 3 times as many weekends to choose from and you get people who are willing to do 2 or maybe even 3 events when they have only done 1 Regional in the past.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

This.

We usually end up having all the LRI's up in Duluth, but only 2 are actually responsible for the events. There's a certain amount of prep that goes into an event if you're the LRI, and then stress during the event that I enjoy not having at every event i'm at :)

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Contact Laurie Shimizu, lfshimizu@gmail.com she's essentially lead volunteer coordinator for Minnesota and tell her what roles you want to volunteer in and ask her what you can do to prepare. (I think it's safe to list her email her since it's here: http://www.usfirst.org/whats-going-o...rogramCode=FRC )

Create an account in VIMS and register to volunteer. https://my.usfirst.org/FIRSTPortal/L...?eventid=17435 that's the Northern Lights Regional in Duluth next year. I'll likely be there as scorekeeper again. I look forward to seeing you there.

The Iowa regional coincides with Easter , so your college may be on break and that may be an easy one to volunteer at.

But don't wait or you'll miss your chance.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Thank you for the contact info; like I said, I volunteered at a couple of events last year here in Minnesota plus Champs, so I'm very aware of VIMS and Laurie (it's pretty impossible not to run into her when you've been around the FRC program here for five years!).

If everything allows, I'm definitely planning on volunteering up in Duluth for a second year as well. See you there!

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Is their any website or map of how many teams are in each state? I know in Indiana, there are 49 teams. I'm Curious about the other 49 states.

If not, How did you make your map. I'd like to know for future maps. Thanks

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

http://www.usfirst.org/whats-going-o...Stat eProv=LA

That will give you the teams in Louisiana. Replace LA with whatever state you want.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Unfortunately it's not that easy. This list ends up including extinct teams from the state searched.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

For accurate team lists I use frclinks.com/t/MI-USA. Just replace the abbreviation and that'll give you the list you want.





frclinks is awesome

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

A handful of reasons (as far as I have been able to tell, this is in no means official):

1. FIRST HQ- They probably wanted a small region to try it out, to disprove the notion of "too small"...

2. ...and IndianaFIRST had been looking to go this direction for some time. I've heard it mentioned as far back as CAGE Match 2013; I've gotten the impression that this was in the works long before that too.

3. More events, based on where the teams are. Before, all IN had for official events were Boilermaker (local for quite a few, but growth stunted due to venue and possibly cost limitations) and crossroads (local for nobody in 2013, and only 5188 in 2014). You see, events were based on who had the means to host a full blown regional, not on where the teams actually are. Now, we have events in Indy (local for many teams), Purdue area (also quasi-local for many), and Kokomo (Not just local, but historic too!). Teams south of Indy are still no longer local to anything, but as their numbers grow, I'm sure an event down there will be a thing (Columbus?). Not to mention that Indiana teams get two events for the price of one out of the deal, in addition to less travel.

4. Volunteers- Indiana has a relatively large and more notably, devoted volunteer base that is the special sauce needed to make a district thrive. I'd say this is the main reason why IndianaFIRST made the jump. If it counts for anything, at all four events, many of the higher volunteer positions had the same people filling the roles at all four events. I was scorekeeper at all four, and the same was true for the other key field volunteers (FTAs, Field supervisor, etc.) and most of the AV crew. Where we somewhat lack in sheer numbers, we make up for in devotion to what we do to make the events awesome for all who attend.

Despite some early hiccups and other quirks, ultimately, it worked great, especially for the teams (as far as I know, anyway). Whatever reason you want to pick, the decision, at least IMHO, was the right one.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

^^ This.

Indiana FRC volunteers made the IRI what it is. I would love to be in Kokomo for Week 7, but my team intends to be in Grand Rapids that weekend. ;)

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Again, these are just my thoughts. I feel like making a district where there are already a lot of teams is not very smart. The whole point of districts is to make a fairly well populated area and turn it into a very populated area. So basically, I feel like if you have enough teams to make 3 district events in an area the size of our state, switch to districts. As is, Indiana has 1 team per every 738.5 square miles. Then, due to the cheaper model, you can see more teams in that area. That's the whole point of districts. It's to make an area to have a higher frc team population density. Does that make sense?

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Unpopular suggestion that is probably borderline crazy... The scale of MN presents an issue, they would need at least 2 events a week during competition to go to districts. From some mapping I did a couple weeks ago I noticed that the overwhelming majority of MN teams are fairly clustered. I propose a reduction in team population in the short term (3-5 years). Merging together multiple teams would result in smaller team populations, likely reduce strain on smaller teams and reduce competition for sponsors. It could also make it feasible to transition to the District model due to reduced event requirements.

If you say that the volunteer base can support 8 events... reduce to 160 teams. It should be possible.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

So basically, the conversation now is about the volunteer base? So would MN like to go to districts if they had the volunteer base of Michigan? I can't believe how many events they have in Michigan and the fact that they have enough volunteers to keep up. So would you then be a district supporter if MN had a better volunteer base? I'm just curious.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I'm not sure where you're getting that I do or don't support districts. I was responding to the number of folks in this thread saying MN can't go to Districts because they are too large and their current volunteer base would be spread too thin. I proposed a solution to that problem.

As a long time Michigander and short time New Englander... I support districts. I was a volunteer the first year in MI, a volunteer in MAR the first year they went to districts, and a volunteer the first year when NE went to districts. I know the pains of going to districts fairly well.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

That isn't the only reason the area isn't going Districts anytime soon. Also, Kentucky is not being included in any of the models.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Ah. Got you. I wasn't meaning to say you did/ didn't support districts. I was just curious if the only reason people in MN are against districts for the sole reason of volunteers. Hopefully that make thing clearer ;)

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

The volunteer issue is one thing and over 3 or 4 years could be addressed.

The bigger issue to me though is keeping it loud. Last year, Minnesota had 4 regionals. The two Duluth regionals are held under one roof, with 123 teams last year in the DECC. The Minneapolis regionals are held in two buildings next door to each other again with 123 teams last year.

Both of those events get real media attention. The local papers and television stations do stories on the events every year. In Duluth, one of the local teams has partnered with the newspaper to put a wrap over the paper during the event so everyone who gets a paper knows what's going on at the DECC that week.

That's not loud, that's LOUD.:eek: :ahh: :eek: :ahh: :eek:

Minnesota would lose that going to districts.

People talk about how districts are awesome because teams get two plays where they'll see maybe 60 or 70 different teams across those events. But in Minnesota there's already 122 other teams at these double regionals. It would be a step backward for teams in Minnesota.

Not to mention, we've had Chinese, and Turkish teams at Minnesota events. We've had the Hawaiian Kids out. We'd lose those international and long distance participants if we went to districts.

Quite frankly FIRST should be using Minnesota as a model for the rest of the program, not trying to move Minnesota away from what is currently the loudest program in the world.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

... [citation needed]

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Sounds like it would make an excellent State Championship.


If you're an Alaskan school new to FRC, are you more likely to approve giving students an entire week off to go to two highschools in Washington, or giving them a single weekend at a big convention center in San Jose/LA/Salt Lake City/wherever?

Districts are great, but they don't belong everywhere, especially not Alaska.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Totally agreed. You probably should have around 50 teams to go to districts. You may be able to get away with 45 teams but assuming you have at minimum, 32 teams go to District Champs, you need around 50 teams. That's basically where Indiana was last year.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Minnesota doesn't have enough volunteers, Regions X, Y, and Z don't have enough teams.

You know where has a large number of teams and a large volunteer base with dozens of teams that only get 8 or 9 qualification matches total for their registration fee? NEW YORK

There was obviously an in-depth thread about districts in New York a while back, but almost every team in the state would benefit greatly from districts.

Upstate teams that currently travel to get to two events can now have two events for the price of one, and possibly closer by. Downstate teams that currently attend one event can now attend two for the price of one, with more matches/event. Teams that build tremendous machines both upstate and downstate, but fail to win regionals can now have an opportunity to compete at higher levels if they choose.

Logistics issues include the great distances between upstate and downstate, and the location of a district championship, but these wouldn't affect the majority of teams in the state, and teams both upstate and downstate have close-knit networks of teams and sponsors that can assist with travel fees if necessary.

This would be huge for teams that consistently build good machines, but have trouble winning events with the intense competition at New York events, like 229, 694, 1126, 1511, 2791, as well as help bolster smart teams with lower resources, like 5236.

it could also help to spur team growth in New York City, as well as more sparsely populated areas of the state, like Central New York and the Adirondacks.

So please New York. Get it together and let's make districts happen for 2017 or 2018.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

It does. We've had a State Championship each of the past 4 years, sponsored by the Minnesota State High School League, the same organization that runs all the football, hockey, soccer, etc across the state. It's the oldest high school league sponsored championship around.

One other thing that hasn't been mentioned is our existing relationships with certain organizations in the state... For example, the University of Minnesota, which makes our Minneapolis double regional possible. You really can't understate the value the U of M or MSHSL places on FIRST and our current level of interaction with them. Switching to districts would affect both those relationships, something that needs to be done very carefully. It wouldn't be good to tick off some of the biggest event sponsors we have...

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I see what your saying about sponsors. I actually never thought for about how much sponsors affect the events. AndyMark being in Indiana helps by sponsoring I believe all of the district events. I bet that's why the Championship is in Kokomo since that's where they are located I believe. They make the district model work well. The only bad thing about switching to districts in Indiana sponsor wise is that there is now no event at Purdue and they sponsor 3 teams. I'm curious to see if those 3 teams still get sponsorships from Purdue.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

There are four teams in the Lafayette/West Lafayette area sponsored by Purdue FIRST. The fact that we are not hosting a district event at Purdue this year does not affect the sponsorship to the teams.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Like I mentioned in the Indiana thread, dates and locations for Indiana districts this year were mostly driven by venue availibility.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Purdue has a college organization for FIRST alumni that mentors FRC, FTC, and FLL teams around the Lafayette/West Lafayette area I believe (I found this out when I visited the Purdue University campus this summer, here is the link to their website).

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I work with a lot of different FRC teams in Minnesota, often times I get the late night phone call or email from a coach that needs help installing labview on their computer, or needs help figuring out how to CAD or just wants general support on building, programming or wiring of their robot. During the build season I'll be up late at night answering these emails trying to support teams to the best of my ability. Currently we don't have enough experience in Minnesota to truly run 192 FRC teams the way they are supposed to be run, in my opinion, about 50 of the teams are missing out on the full FRC inspiration and experience due to not having enough experience in the state. If you were to reduce the number of teams and switch to districts at the same time, you could more effectively reach and inspire the students Minnesota. You would be getting more bang for your buck.

I said it once and I'll say it again, the biggest issue with MN not going to districts at the moment is the fact we don't have a non-profit. We could have all of the volunteers in the world but if we don't have an organization running it, we will still not have districts.

Who won the Make it Loud Award at championships last year and what state was he from? What was the reasoning he won the Make it Loud Award? Here is a link if you don't remember.

As a coach of a FRC team in Minnesota I feel it would be a step forward to switch to districts. Right now, my team gets 10 qualification matches in a good year for $5000, if we were in districts, we would be getting 24 matches for the same amount of money. In addition to that, there would be a potential to host a district event at our high school on a Friday which would in turn cause the school population as a whole to get more involved. Our cafeteria is right next to the Main Gym and it is pretty much impossible to miss anything going on in the gym during lunch.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

This excuse about different regions not having enough volunteers to go to districts is silly. Having just moved to Southwestern Ohio, I begin to think about where I would volunteer at events if I choose to. Why would I volunteer at an Ohio event and take 2 days off from work when I could take 1 day off and volunteer at a district event in Indiana? If I have to use personal vacation time, quite simply I wouldn't.

In each of these regions that claim to "not have enough volunteers" there are plenty of people for which the marginal difference between 2 vacation days vs. 0 or 1 vacation days to volunteer at an event is a significant difference. So by going to districts more people will choose to volunteer. And I'm aware this isn't the case for everyone, but Saturday-Sunday district events would make the choice to volunteer very easy for me.

Where do I sign up to volunteer? ;)

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

The issue isn't a "number of bodies" thing - switching formats means reducing the number of vacation days and (hopefully) decreasing travel distance to events. The problem is the number of experienced and trained Key Volunteers. I don't care how many new volunteers you get, you can't take someone with no experience and make them an LRI, Head Ref, or FTA overnight. It takes experience at events and some amount of training from people already in those roles before you can step up.

Plus, most volunteers get signed up in VIMS and committed in the December-February time frame... I know myself and the other MN LRI's were asked to commit last month for specific events this upcoming season - that's at least 6 months in advance, if not more. It's hard to find that level of commitment, to find people willing to commit for events well before their teams has even decided where it's going.

If MN had switched to districts 2 years ago, I would have been asked to be LRI at an event every weekend. As it stands now, I've been able to recruit enough other LRI's that I would only need to do 3 district events this year (and with the other identified LRI's we're starting training plans for, pretty soon that will be reduced to 2, even if the number of potential district events increases). Other Key Volunteer positions aren't in as good of shape here, not yet.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

The Duluth double-regional venue would probably make for a rather loud two-field state championship similar to Michigan's this year.

If MN sends half of its 192 teams (96) to MNSC, each team could have 12 qualifications matches with 96 matches played on each field, which is comparable to the current Duluth regionals (90 qualification matches at NLR, 95 at LSR).

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Duluth wouldn't make a ton of sense for a state championship location. While the venue is fantastic for accommodating two fields and large number of teams, it is about two hours from the Twin Cities, where the vast majority of MN FRC teams are from. While that isn't prohibitive for most (any?) teams in terms of sheer distance, it does mean that most teams would need to get hotel rooms. It also means fewer spectators, as parents would have to make the trek, and you wouldn't have nearly as big of a population to pull in random passer-bys.

If we are talking about a bigger-than-just-Minnesota district, the Twin Cities becomes even more attractive.

But talking about a (in-season) state (or bigger) championship is getting far from the original discussion, and is jumping the gun by at least a year anyway.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Thanks for all that replied to my thoughts about the Purdue sponsorships. I honestly didn't know anything for sure I was just guessing (I always forget to mention that in my posts ;) ) thanks for commenting because now I know the facts ;)

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

The mechanics of setting up a non profit is not a big deal, it is having the people who are willing to step up and do it that is the issue. I'm pretty sure that before joining the District system IN didn't have a non profit. I know you know the Executive Director of that organization and she stepped into the job as part of the switch to the District System.

When the PNW district was formed we had 2 LRIs, I FTA, 2 head refs. We recruited the FTAs who did their basic training at our off season events. We had people who had been RIs and Refs step up and agree to those lead positions. The first season we did have a couple of those key volunteers do 3 events, including CMP with 11 events. Last year no one did more than 2 other than our Chief LRI stepping in at an extra event when the LRI at one event was very sick and she was sent home.

In the PNW it really was a case of build it and they will come.

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I love this thread. It has provided great fodder for the MNFIRST higher-ups to chew on.

Here is what I see - and this is my own opinion:

MN is an anomaly for a few reasons:
1. MN grew so large so quickly - MNFirst is not sure what is a 'trend' or what is a 'growth pang'.
2. MN has 4 incredible regionals that draw in teams from around the US and the rest of the world - it would be hard to step away from this model. The media coverage of all four events is incredible.
3. MN is not done growing. Most MPLS/StPaul area teams are now maturing into strong teams; almost all Duluth area/Arrowhead/Iron Range schools have teams; the southeast has been covered and most students have access to a team. However, the Central Minnesota area is still an untapped resource. The areas around St Cloud and Mankato have the potential to produce another 30-50 teams.
4. Because of the strong, rapid growth, it is hard to gather/train a large volunteer army - and MNFIRST is doing all that they can to help this!
5. The MSHSL adopting FRC as the State's Robotics High School program proves to be an issue. It is not the sole fact that the MSHSL adopted FRC - it is the fact that the State Tournament happens on the calendar constraints of the UofM.
6. The UofM has been a great partner with MNFIRST. If MNFIRST decides to stray from the Regional Model, we could lose the UofM as one of our oldest and best sponsors. I am not ready to accept that outcome.
7. MN needs another regional - possibly two - to gather the support from the local communities and the state's top companies to throw their support behind FRC. IF St Cloud can gain enough support (from the local companies) to bring in a FRC Regional, this could be the lynchpin for MN going to Districts.
8. ALL of MN's regionals happen on the East side (including the new IA regional) of the state. Because of this, there is no growth in volunteer numbers in the greater part of MN.

In fact, some of the larger high schools in Minnesota do not yet have an FRC team. Saint Michael-Albertville, Rogers, St Cloud Tech, St Cloud Apollo, Sartell, Princeton, and 30 other schools in Central MN do not have their own FRC team. Students from these schools have to join other teams or be apart of a conjoined team.

What most people don't realize is that St Cloud is the HUB of manufacturing in Minnesota. It is not that St Cloud has more manufacturers that other metro areas in MN - it is that the greater St Cloud area (Central MN) hosts a great many mid-level manufacturers that have not yet seen the benefits of FRC in their local communities. The CMMA (Central Minnesota Manufacturers Association) has recently started a program to help sponsor teams in the area. If the business and hospitality communities see the benefit, St Cloud has a real chance of gaining the next Regional in MN.

The next hurdle for MN is St Cloud State University. IF SCSU can come into the fold of MNFIRST - and provide MNFIRST the same ammenities that the UofM does, then Central MN can start to grow additional Volunteers. Until then, we will be relegated to bringing up Volunteer talent in the east - or from WI, IL, etc.

Before MN goes to districts, I would like to see two more Regionals. One in St Cloud, and one in Mankato. If MNFIRST finds a way for these to happen, then I see MN going to districts in short order.

And I like Regionals. It is like a poker tournament in the final round - all chips in from all participants. It also allows for great team-building events for those that have to travel great distances...

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

I'm curious about a few things since I've never participated in the regional model before. So what would adding two regionals add to benefit FIRST in MN? Is it just to get the community to rally behind districts? Or would that be to help MN train volunteers to the higher positions. If MN adds more regionals, more teams would join and MN would be in the same situation. MN would need more districts with more teams after adding more regionals. Either which way MN goes, MN will need more volunteers. MN had 192 teams last year. NE district had 175 teams last year. They had 10 district events and the championship. MN would probably need around 10-12 district event and the championship. The championship would be Like a regional volunteer wise so the 10-12 district events would be like the volunteers from 3 regionals. With that said, district events are smaller which requires a little less volunteers (by my guess) since each district event would be around 35-42 teams where the regionals in MN were around 62 teams at each. NE had a district championship with 60 teams so that would be the equivalent of a regional. The. You could host that event at a regional facility. My thoughts are, if MN adds more regionals or they switch to districts, the volunteer problem would still be there. The only reason to stick with regionals over districts would be due to Sponsors, lack community support, or lack of facilities. And I feel like sponsors wouldn't care as much because with districts, you'll be able to send more teams to worlds. Last year, NE had a guaranteed 35 spots not including wait list. MN only had 24 spots guaranteed last year if my math is correct. And NE is a smaller district. So I could see MN having 38 spots for worlds. That would make many robot sponsors happy, wouldn't it? Thanks for reading. I'm curious to see how close or far off I am. ;)

Re: Current Districts Map. Who is next?
 

Just a note on this... Yes, we have to work with the U of M calendar to get a venue for the State Championship, but that time of year it's actually not that difficult. The hockey arena across the street (you know, the build with AC) is usually being used for graduation stuff, but where we are isn't (probably because it has no A.C.!). For a large part the Championship date is based on the earliest date we can expect robots to be shipped back from Champs with expedited shipping. That is really our biggest constraint in scheduling it each year.