![]() |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
2 Attachment(s)
Sorry I was busy this past weekend and fell behind here.
I took a look at what was the origin of the lower initial registration between last year and this year. The attached image compares team registration by the first weekend after opening, and is just the difference between last season and this season (negative means fewer teams from that location registered this year, positive means more registered this year). It seems to be the PNW District somewhat offset by gains in China. Registration slowed over the weekend as it usually does. We passed 1900 teams around 5 o'clock on Monday. We can see by the second attachment that registration has at least met up with last year, even though we know it must be ahead by a margin. P.S. The dates on the base axis of the second chart are normalized to changing opening dates back to 2005 and don't reflect the current dates. |
Re: Registration 2016
I'm not a moderator, so I can't split the posts into separate threads.
Not sure that I'd want the extra workload. CD threads usually turn into more of a chat room. People asking unrelated questions because this is where they found people talking. Some posts have been way off topic, and conversations, while others are debating issues that bear on the numbers. |
Re: Registration 2016
What's going on with PNW?
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
-Mike |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
Because of this, we see a lot of teams not registered. We should see a massive spike in PNW teams come second event registration. EDIT: See post above by Mike for more info! |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
Quote:
1) the pits were really dim (we needed to use work lights to see well inside the robot). 2) the event tends to be one of the most difficult districts in the state. As a younger team, that makes it harder to qualify for MSC. 3) the bleachers are open underneath, so it's easy to drop items down into the void. 4) there's many other events within comfortable driving distance that we like better. |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
FIRST requires the home events to be designated by nearest zip code and even though the event we wanted was closer (by actual mileage) our home event was designated as a different one. You should see a big jump when we all get a chance to use our first choice. It is really a matter of timing... we try to set up our season so that the events are spaced out so students aren't out of class for 2 weeks in a row. There also might be a little kickback because of the new payment schedule/ payment amounts but I am not sure about that.... I will reserve comments regarding that to other threads. |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
For S. MN teams, Cedar Falls looks like it could be a cheaper destination than Duluth. Looking at rack rates, the Radisson is 50% higher than the Clarion. Also lower transportation costs. |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
When is the second registration date? Same with 3rd 4th or 5th. I'd just like to know. Thanks.
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
2001 teams currently registered as of this morning.
The St. Louis Regional went to waitlist yesterday. The first since the beginning heady 27 hours. 16 countries have been heard from: 1 ---- Ecuador 1 ---- Germany 1 ---- Poland 1 ---- Taiwan 2 ---- Chile 2 ---- Dominican Republic 3 ---- Netherlands 2 ---- Turkey 2 ---- United Kingdom 3 ---- Brazil 6 ---- Canada-AB 7 ---- Israel 11 --- Australia 21 --- Mexico 26 --- Canada-QC 30 --- China 107 -- Canada-ON 1775 - USA |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
And why is Canada splitted? :( |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Hey. I noticed on the FIRST website that Georgia districts are abbreviated PCH. So, FiM stands for FIRST in Michigan and IN stands for Indiana so I was expected Georgia to be like FiG or GA. Any ideas on what PCH stands for? Could it be Peach?
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Last year China had 23 teams.
I split Canada just to show which provinces have the most growth. |
Re: Registration 2016
It is amazing that already China has the third highest number of registered teams (granted, Israel still has many more yet to show up, but still...)
I wonder how long it will be until China surpasses Canada. 2018? |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
And multiple regionals can be arranged, I'm sure. It was "only" 17 FRC seasons ago that CA had their first regional. The second followed two seasons later. The third took 3-4 years as I recall. The fourth followed another 3-4 years later. And another one came a long about the same amount of time later... but the last couple additions didn't take quite that long. It just takes a little time... |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Orlando & Silicon Valley booked up yesterday.
There were 197 Canadian teams last season. As can be seen by the first weekend comparison, in general, QC is slower signing up this year, while ON is quicker, and they offset each other for a Canadian registration pace that's pretty normal. Canada is at ~ 76% of last year's final count. All FRC is at ~ 72% of last year's final count. 2100 teams have registered. 130 rookies |
Re: Registration 2016
1 Attachment(s)
Registration numbers finally surpassed last season at this same time.
2200 teams |
Re: Registration 2016
What's that bump that always occurs around the 3rd week of October? 2nd event registration causing more initial registrations? FiM teams getting enrolled? Grant approvals?
|
Re: Registration 2016
I ran the numbers but didn't have time for a graph. I'm traveling this weekend, so I won't be able to post the graph until Sunday.
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
1 Attachment(s)
Here's another year-to-year comparison of registration numbers by area.
This at the time of the graph in my previous post, so they can be compared. I'll go review just where the bump came from in previous years, but I think it's just the surge after the weekend, as the week starts and teams start registering during normal business hours. The phenomena is more pronounced early in registration and the effect gradually lessens as time goes by and the registration graph levels out. In the graphs we can see weekend plateaus and weekday climbs. It's more obvious when the graph is zoomed in. |
Re: Registration 2016
New Michigan district event on FIRST website. It is in Week 2. You would never guess where it is. It is a brilliant idea.
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
This is a luxury enjoyed by every other high school sport. |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Imagine having a number of locations depending on the district that host events each week and the district championship as normal...so teams could choose to attend 2 - 3 events at one location.
It could allow for those teams to have access to the field in between events but I can't imagine the logistics needed for this.... |
Re: Registration 2016
1 Attachment(s)
2nd District registration gave us a bit of a bump at noon today.
We're at 2448 teams registered. |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
One of the goals of Michigan Districts stated as "This allows teams to play close to home and gives families, schools, local government, businesses and media easy access to local FIRST Competitions." By putting two events in the same place one group of teams get to do this twice while other groups of teams are waiting for their chance to do this. Additionally I don't believe you will see the benefit one just field setup under a model like this, since I doubt many schools will just let teams leave a set up FRC field in their gym for a whole week. Gym classes, clubs, and other sports will still need to utilize that gym. |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
Also, Kettering is a University and they do actually have a field set up that teams can visit. I don't entirely know the details of how a team would go about visiting but the university is pretty FRC-friendly in general. There's a bunch of KU students on this forum that may be able to address that concern more thoroughly. |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Maybe we could have a Kettering East and a Kettering West event with the field moved from one end of the rec to the other. /s
|
Re: Registration 2016
Team 5813 just registered for the UNH District Event. :)
~Daler |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
1 Attachment(s)
2600 teams at 6:45pm today.
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Crossed the 2700 team mark.
|
Re: Registration 2016
So GA just moved to districts and we're guaranteed 2 events but 2 of the events are full and the other 2 are on the same weekend...
We are only registered for one event because of the situation described above. Will we still get 2 events or are we stuck with 1? |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
I wonder how many of the 200+ Minnesota teams will try for 2 regionals this year. |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
I'm certain that the people in charge will do everything possible to ensure that all teams get two events. |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
I'm going to go out on a limb and predict that Iowa is going to fill up pretty quickly |
Re: Registration 2016
3234 will be at east Kentwood district and we are currently waitlisted for gull lake
|
Re: Registration 2016
Team 6000 is the Shalhevet School in Los Angeles, CA
|
Re: Registration 2016
Team 1708 will be attending the Pittsburgh Regional again this year along with one other one TBA! So excited for this years game.
|
Re: Registration 2016
Little random but I'm just going to say I'm impressed with the growth of teams internationally. Great to see it really become a worldwide program.
|
Re: Registration 2016
1 Attachment(s)
Here are the international scores.
19 countries heard from. 25---Australia 6----Brazil 186--Canada 2----Chile 31---China 1----Colombia 1----Czech Republic 2----Dominican Republic 1----Ecuador 1----Germany 40---Israel 39---Mexico 2----Netherlands 1----Poland 1----Singapore 1----Taiwan 10---Turkey 2----United Kingdom 2394-USA |
Re: Registration 2016
What happens to the wait lists when the 2nd registration opens Thursday? It's been a while since our team has attended more than one competition. The two sites we were considering have zero capacity now. Does that mean we should consider somewhere else, or will that capacity be increased for the 2nd round? If capacity is increased, do they pull from the existing wait list first?
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
Your best bet is to look at the historical size for those two events - how many teams are usually at them?. That will give you an idea of how many teams will be pulled off the waitlist later to bring it up to full. Some events are actually already full, with no room to expand!. After that, look at the new color coding for the waitlist for the two events. As explained in the FRC blog, the color coding can give you an idea of how big the wait list currently is, versus the number of spots that will be available. |
Re: Registration 2016
Also keep in mind the new color coding system for the waitlist.
|
Re: Registration 2016
Thank you very much - that helps a lot!
|
Re: Registration 2016
Michigan's Gull Lake event is going to be moving from week 2 to week 3 if it doesn't change venues (insert grumble about our home event also being week 3). This will leave Michigan with only
|
Re: Registration 2016
Welcome India - FRC Team 6024!
I first met R-Factor at the 2013 FLL API where they won the Champions Award. At the 2015 FTC API they won the Inspire Award and completely won the judge's hearts. And now they officially registered for the 2016 Sydney Regional. They are the FIRST progression in action! |
Re: Registration 2016
Apologies if this has been asked before:
In TIMS, will the registration link appear automatically at noon after logging in, or do you a) have to refresh the page yourself, or b) log in no earlier than noon? I ask because I expect the seconds to count today. |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
Good luck! |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
This Regional Availability site is great. http://173.255.246.196/2016/
Thank you to whoever wrote this code. FIRST & RobotEvents should setup a similar page for all the competitions (FTC, FLL, VEX, VEXiq...) |
Re: Registration 2016
With 1 minute remaining, somebody moves from Gull Lake to Troy ...
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Within 30 seconds after opening, Ventura added 5 teams. Within 60 seconds, the 14 previously-available spots were filled.
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
Couldnt get in on the few remaining spots left. Currently on waitlist... |
Re: Registration 2016
358 is waitlisted for Tech Valley, too.
|
Re: Registration 2016
Alamo also full in the first 5 minutes.
Many events haven't increased their cap for the second round. Iowa added 30 teams in 10 minutes. |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Of the remaining open Regionals...
By 1 minute - 7 events filled 2 minutes - 9 events filled 3 minutes - 11 events were filled No other fillings occurred in the following 15 minutes. The Regionals in no particular order were:
Open slots/Event 27 Arkansas Rock City Regional 27 Idaho Regional 27 Lone Star Regional 23 Hub City Regional 22 Western Canada Regional 19 Utah Regional 18 Las Vegas Regional 16 Arizona North Regional 14 Queen City Regional 13 Wisconsin Regional 11 Iowa Regional 11 South Florida Regional 10 Buckeye Regional 10 Hawaii Regional 8 Palmetto Regional 8 Central Valley Regional 8 Israel Regional - see Site Info for additional information 8 North Bay Regional 6 Rocket City Regional 6 Windsor Essex Great Lakes Regional 5 Colorado Regional 3 Mexico City Regional 3 Australia Regional 2 Bayou Regional |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
edit: If you decided to not attend your home event this year. I second what Dave says two posts down. |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
|
Re: Registration 2016
In my limited time to read ChiefDelphi these days, this is the thread I am most interested in reading. Many thanks to Mark McLeod and all who post good information here.
Quote:
I agree with Andrew, this is excellent! Thank you for coordinating this. I do have one request: please add another column of event dates next to each event. Sincerely, Andy Baker |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
Let me second Andy's thoughts; this page is a great resource. Thanks for putting it together. |
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for the remarks! |
Re: Registration 2016
2800 Teams around noon today.
Closing in on last year's total of 2892. |
Re: Registration 2016
All 7 CA events are "full".
|
Re: Registration 2016
FYI: I didn't see it posted anywhere here, but it's officially listed on my.usfirst.org/myarea/index.lasso, Gull Lake has switched weekends from Week 2 to Week 3.
|
Re: Registration 2016
Quote:
(Edit based on team count they still need 19 districts of 40 teams) |
Re: Registration 2016
Howdy! To clarify any confusion, the Gull Lake event is only changing venue. The event will be during Week 2 over March 10th, 11th and 12th.
The event is now identified as the Lakeview Event. The new venue is Lakeview High School, which is only about 15 miles down the road in Battle Creek. As co-host of this event, I am excited to invite all of you to a fantastic venue. We (4327) are co-hosting with the Gull Lake team (4381) who did a great job hosting these past several years. TL;DR Gull Lake event now Lakeview event in Battle Creek. Still Week 2. Carry on. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:29. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi