Top regional winners
 

1. 254 - 29 Regional wins
2. 1114 - 26 Regional wins
3. 2056 - 22 Regional wins
4. 67 - 21 Regional wins
5. 359 and 469 - 17 Regional wins
6. 118 - 16 Regional wins
7. 33 and 16 and 148 - 14 Regional wins
8. 233 and 217 - 12 Regional wins
9. 111 and 987 - 11 Regional wins
10. 1717 and 1983 - 10 Regional wins

67 and 469 are different on tba because the DCMP were counted too

Re: Top regional winners
 

What is point of this?

Re: Top regional winners
 

Yes, I too read The Blue Alliance.

Re: Top regional winners
 

It is too show that the tba insights page is wrong

Re: Top regional winners
 

You know you can email the folks at tba?

Re: Top regional winners
 

Some people consider DCMP the same as a regional.

Re: Top regional winners
 

Perhaps it would be interesting to look at percentages of regionals played & won vs number of regionals won. It would reduce the impact of the teams' ages.

Re: Top regional winners
 

2056 - 100% :)

Re: Top regional winners
 

They're also pretty attentive on the #moardata @ The Blue Alliance Facebook group.

Re: Top regional winners
 

Where did you come up with the teams on your list? Here are some other teams with 10 or more regional wins:

175, 330, 1986.

Re: Top regional winners
 

With WATER even more stacked than last year, I hope they can keep it that way :yikes:

Re: Top regional winners
 

I believe "some people" includes FIRST in this case.

Re: Top regional winners
 

Not sure if TBA statistics (that are just made because people enjoy them) are FIRST official. Anyone know for sure?

Re: Top regional winners
 

The insights on TBA are made to follow "significant" trends to the FIRST community, not necessarily the same way as FIRST records them. (Some of the stats are not even recorded by FIRST, rather TBA calculated them directly from regional data)

Blue Banners, Championship Wins, and Chairman's are self explanatory. Regional and District wins also includes District Championships even though the title does not explicitly say so (I agree that it SHOULD include DCMPs), and the successful teamups include every alliance that wins a blue banner: Regional, District, DCMP, CMP Division, and Einstein. This is why a lot of "odd" combos pop up - 254 and 111, for example, are credited with 3 successful teamups due to an Einstein appearance together in 2001 and a Einstein win in 2011. Expect them to win together again in 2021. :) I feel like World champs alliances should not be counted twice in this stat, but it is how it is.

Re: Top regional winners
 

#IFIAlliance first seed?

Re: Top regional winners
 

Just saying 1114, 2056, 148 and 610 can't all be in alliance #1 :yikes:
Looks like the regional is stronger than a world subdivision

Re: Top regional winners
 

This brought me back to this picture from before my time



Team IFI has changed since then...

Re: Top regional winners
 

Having worked with a lot of the TBA data, people should really know that lots of 2005 data is non-existent. I don't know why... It just is. TBA data I would assume is compiled by TBA and it's databases, I doubt FIRST would be interested in keeping track of such information for themselves.

This might be a slight overstatement.

Re: Top regional winners
 

2056 drop the mike.

Re: Top regional winners
 

TEAM IFI: All your banners belong to us.

Re: Top regional winners
 

Correct. 1986 is currently at 11 regional wins.

Re: Top regional winners
 

Always a shocker to people when we tell everyone we have won more division wins than regional wins... (2-1)

Re: Top regional winners
 

Re: Top regional winners
 

1671 has more World Championship wins than Regional Wins (1-0).

Re: Top regional winners
 

Some of the match data from that year just doesn't really exist. Or it's in really weird formats. Or it's just flat out wrong. (On FIRST's own pages)

Re: Top regional winners
 

I had to check this to believe it, that's so cool.:eek:

Re: Top regional winners
 

Just weird that it happened over multiple events in the same year. Some FMS bug or something?

Re: Top regional winners
 

You must be great at parties.

Re: Top regional winners
 

I'm working on building an open data portal for my day job and it has functionality in it where you would be able to chart by columns, so you could do on the fly charting based on whatever you wanted to see (such as # of matches played, number of teams by year, a team's average event score.... Would something like that be a cool idea or something that you wouldn't be interested in? I can push it up to github as a feature request if so.

Re: Top regional winners
 

Possible. Also possible that the events didn't have internet and the data was never saved. Or that it was corrupted. I mean, that was 10 years ago.

Re: Top regional winners
 

Why not? I can think of several scenarios in which that could happen.

Re: Top regional winners
 

2005 was the first year of a new FMS. There were some issues with data reporting that year.

Re: Top regional winners
 

Unless FIRST is changing alliances this year, only 3 of those 4 can be on the #1 alliance.

Re: Top regional winners
 

I've seen 4 team alliances before as well (pssst, check your signature).

Re: Top regional winners
 

Not at the Waterloo Regional, though.
Edit: Never mind. (Think before you post)

Re: Top regional winners
 

Ontario is a strange place.

We just had an off-season event where 1310 didn't even make it to the eliminations despite being North Bay Regional winners, possessing a solid 3 tote auto, and a good landfill robot capable of putting up multiple capped, noodled 6-stacks.

Anything's possible... (except 2056 losing a regional)

Re: Top regional winners
 

FLR 2005 had a very rough event with the Hatch scoring system that year.
Thank God for Joe Ross.