Club vs Team Approach
 

Hi All:
I'm conflicted between a club vs a team approach to running an FRC team.
By club, I mean no tryouts, easy to join, right after school and focused on education. By team, I mean dues and build hours are required. Week night and weekend meetings. Plus the focus is on constructing a robot.

During the Fall we get a ton of students and run more like a club.
We get a low turnout on the weekends. It doesn't matter if its a general build day, a workshop or an outreach event.

In the winter we morph into more of a team and lose a large number of students, but the students that remain are more committed to attending meetings and building a robot.

Does aiming to be a team and being more restrictive from the beginning help you compete and be able to deliver a more technical student education?

I would like to learn if other teams have had these issues, how they improved and how they would rate themselves on a club / team dimension.

Dave

Re: Club vs Team Approach
 

Why are these mutually exclusive?

Re: Club vs Team Approach
 

I'm sure you'll get lots of answers here, but your first step is probably to ask the current members what they want. We asked our (then club) what they wanted and it was almost a unanimous decision to become a "team". Have a frank conversation about the differences and the benefits of becoming a team and then maybe take a vote. Ultimately, it is up to the groups leadership, but getting a feel for the room can be very useful.

We changed this year to become a "team" and I think it has minimal but positive results. People realized from day one what was "required" of them which prevented a lot of Freshman from joining activities that would usually prevent them from coming. Overall we have had a better turn out then ever bringing about 15 people to our last competition despite the fact that a large amount of our members had to be at a football game (band members).

I feel like even just saying team instead of club has a positive effect.

Re: Club vs Team Approach
 

2706 is a new community team, and with no specific school backing, we have to focus on our end goal (building an FRC robot good enough to compete in regionals) while also juggling the start-from-zero aspect. We have to temper our expectations with practical realities like expending time trying to find meeting spaces, build spaces, fundraising like mad. The nice thing is that we are open to students from ALL local schools.

We call ourselves a team and we do charge a team fee to cover basic expenses. Sometimes parents will ask us "can Billy join your robotics club?" and we say "sure, Billy can join the robotics team". (Emphasis added here but NOT when we talk to the parents.) We are going to have an all-hands meeting soon where we will talk about what's going to happen during build season and competition season. We have a lot of hockey kids in my area so hopefully people will see that we're not dissimilar in terms of expectations of commitment and time. Since we're not at a school students will need to be driven to meeting/build spaces so we will definitely need parental commitment.

We are not (yet?) stipulating mandatory attendance requirements. Come when you can. But we do make it clear "you get out what you put in" and that when it comes time to choose team leaders and select people for competition teams, selection will naturally favour those who have been around, who have demonstrated skill and knowledge, who know the software, know the robot, know the tools, and are known and trusted by teammates.

Re: Club vs Team Approach
 

Just curious, what would the focus be on, if not constructing a robot?

Re: Club vs Team Approach
 

We really do seem to attract the same type of students that are attracted to Marching Band don't we? We have a decent chunk of band students on our team too, and let's just say that we aren't the band director's favorite people in the world because of it.

Re: Club vs Team Approach
 

Just taking a friendly shot in the dark here... ;)

The focus could be on inspiring students and on changing/inspiring the community around the team.

Some people (but not all) are silly enough to suggest that in FRC the robots are only a part of the "means" and that they aren't the "end".

Others have different motivations.

YMMV.

Blake

Our band director thinks we are going to "make a mistake and blow up the school" whats funny is 90% of our members who do band don't actually want to be there. Its usually just their parents pushing them to do it since they have done it since they were young.

Re: Club vs Team Approach
 

Sorry, I'm having trouble understanding if you're joking/being sarcastic. Care to elaborate on what you mean?

Towards OP: Personally, I think a large part of what FRC is is having the robot be the "means". In my FRC experience, my team was a "team" due to team hours being counted and dues being paid, but it had relaxed atmosphere where the robot wasn't the main issue. The two definitions you gave don't have to be mutually exclusive, as others have pointed out.

Re: Club vs Team Approach
 

We straddle the line a bit. We're open to anyone being involved, and we're perfectly fine with someone that can only show up once a week. However, we have a ton of incentives to encourage increased participation (like travel requirements, lettering requirements), and almost all of our students work towards those incentives. Usually our fall program is attended less than build season, only because students are busy doing other activities (theater, cross country, soccer, and volleyball are some of the big ones, it seems).

Re: Club vs Team Approach
 

We have dealt with this issue for years, and I think we've finally optimized it for our group.

We have an open fall, in which our "varsity" students (the veterans, especially those that have lettered the previous year) do specific training events (such as retasking the previous year's robot) and serve as mentors for the new students, the "JV" squad. JV participates in BEST robotics as an intro to the six week build, the design process, etc. There are no tests for incoming students, and everyone who shows interest is accepted as part of the group, though the "team" is yet to be established.

After BEST is finished (end of October), all students are brought together and given the expectations for participating as part of the "team":

• daily meetings, including Saturdays
• specific skill training sessions
• fundraising
• participation fee
• participation in a serious off-season build
• training in FRC history

The students who stick around become the "varsity" team, and have the opportunity to letter.

We've tried many variations, and this seems to be the most effective. The least effective was to have a "team" and a "club" at the same time. The club students felt second class, and we had a lot of conflicts. Hope this helps some.

Re: Club vs Team Approach
 

Essentially there is no correct or incorrect way to this. Every FRC team has their own culture, so you and your team really need to decide what works best for you.

But my personal opinion on the matter is that it should be structured and run more like a sports team. I would only have tryouts or an application process if there is a large enough group of students coming into the program. Also one of the biggest pieces of advice I would give, is that if at all possible move your meeting times back until around 6:30 for the weekdays. This is one of my favorite things that 1678 does. It allows mentors like me to be available for most meetings, because by then most people are off of work. If you want more mentor involvement, this is one of the biggest things I would do.
Also I've found that when you call yourselves a team, and have certain requirements to stay on the team, it makes the commitment from the students stronger.

So really you need to find out what will work best for your specific program, but I always fall on the side of making it stand out as not just an after school club.

Re: Club vs Team Approach
 

Sure. No problem.

One of my favorite Woody-isms is that the robot is only the campfire we gather around. I 100% believe that building a robot is *not* what Dean, Woody, Dave, etc.ask (but don't insist) FRC teams to focus on year-round.

Including the word "friendly", the winking emoticon, and the YMMV acronym in my other message were an attempt to remind the reader about that in a collegial way, while still acknowledging that FRC participants are free to do whatever makes themselves happy, so long as they pay their fees and follow the rules.

No matter what they end up calling it (team, club, bee, co-op, whatever), I hope the OP's group finds an organizational style, that looks outward as successfully as it looks inward. Celebrations are more fun when lots of friends share them with you.

Blake.

Re: Club vs Team Approach
 

I feel like aiming to be a team is helpful. Being more of a team focuses High School kids seeing how important robotics is to their lives and how much of a time commitment it takes to be on the robotics team. Each year, we do many things for a team that a club wouldn't do.

First, we all have to go through a "job interview" situation. Everyone makes a resume. New members answer short answer questions. Returning members write a paper based on a prompt. Everyone then brings their resume and paper to a 10 minute "job interview" and dresses up to meet with our teacher sponsor, main mentor, and another mentor for a 3 on 1 interview.

Another thing each team member has to do is raise $600 in sponsors. We usually have a couple of months to raise our sponsors or "investors" before dues are due.

Because of these two main things, we have a fairly strict team. This year, we had around 50 kids interview for a spot on the team, we accepted around 35-40 members to the team. By the time build season rolls around, I project we will have around 25-30 members. All the members on our team tend to invest a lot of their time into robotics. Going through a job interview and raising $600 is a lot to do for just a club. It helps members take robotics more seriously.

Many times, I wish that some of our team members were more involved in the team, but then I remember our members are more involved than in many other teams. This process is sort of a pain, but it is what makes our team what it is. I love FIRST but raising $600 is hard. But if we didn't have to do that, we would have a lot of team members that wouldn't care and would treat our team more like a club. It helps lead to our success. I feel like this hard process is part of what made our team so successful in 2015

I hope this helped you. PM me or respond in the thread if you have any more questions about how our team works. Thanks for reading.