![]() |
[FTC]: Tri-Wheel design
We are thinking to go tri-wheel route. Did anybody made a successful tri-wheel design to climb the mountain?
|
Re: [FTC]: Tri-Wheel design
Quote:
![]() Instead we settled for a four pair dual overlapping "cam-wheels" design pictured below. It performs as well at climbing as any of the ~40 bots we have seen here in Illinois so far at league and qualifier competitions. We will be scoring all 160 mountain points most of the time in a couple more weeks, and we may be hitting the 2nd mountain zone in autonomous by then too. Our goal is for our bot alone to contribute 200 points to our aliance effort once we tune our autonomous efforts. ![]() Practice run: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsOTYCp9CJM |
Re: [FTC]: Tri-Wheel design
Quote:
|
Re: [FTC]: Tri-Wheel design
Quote:
We are rookie team and don't have much to start with. Definitely no CNC for us :(. It does look like even veteran teams are struggling with this season game. |
Re: [FTC]: Tri-Wheel design
Quote:
Even though the curve transition from flat to round was was enlarged to improve shape for better corner release from under the churros as wheels go past them, they still will get somewhat stuck, depending on how well they are. or aren't, kept laterally in sync, but we can always re-sync them on the fly well enough to un-stick them and resume climbing. In autonomous, monitoring the sync status and making sync adjustments may prove too difficult though. In teleop we always seem to quickly get high enough to place our dual winch hooks with our single joint swing arm though. -Dick Ledford |
Re: [FTC]: Tri-Wheel design
Quote:
|
Re: [FTC]: Tri-Wheel design
Here are a couple of photos of the 5943 design - we're using a Lazy Susan from mcmaster to allow independent rotation. This is from our current version - we're redesigning the robot currently with a Slewing Ring Bearing instead of the plastic lazy susan. The design works great, however there are some inconsistencies in how we attached the lazy susans and the plastic lazy susans have a "wiggle" in them that causes our chain to skip.
You can download and see our full CAD model on GrabCAD. |
Re: [FTC]: Tri-Wheel design
Quote:
How well does your robot with tri-wheel climb and how high? also seeing that you are using omni wheels, I assume you don't have problems with turning on the floor? |
Re: [FTC]: Tri-Wheel design
Quote:
We got our robot to climb to the mid-zone once during practice with one of our prototypes. At that point, we were using 3D Printed custom sprockets and we sheared about 30% of the teeth off. Since that point we've encountered a lot of issues with the lazy susan we were using. That's why we are switching to the new bearing system that can be seen in the partner space on our GrabCAD account, see V4 of the design. https://workbench.grabcad.com/workbe...fUCrtD7FVlg031 One new item to note, is we removed powered front wheels. We have an idea of how to bring it back but right now the plan is to have that completely removed as it didn't add too much benefit. |
Re: [FTC]: Tri-Wheel design
Quote:
So, am I understanding correctly that you are planning to remove omni-wheels, so your tri-wheel assembly becomes 3-point star wheel? or you just removing power drive to wheels and they will be free spinning? We are still waiting for parts from Pitsco since December 5. One of the thing we are waiting to finish this design is a worm gear box to drive tri-wheel assembly. |
Re: [FTC]: Tri-Wheel design
Looking at your CAD design, wanted to ask you, where do you get sliders?
|
Re: [FTC]: Tri-Wheel design
As promised. Here are pictures of our tri-wheel design. That was this morning. It has been taken apart now :S
It showed a lot of promise, however even with 4:1 worm drive powered by AM motor wasn't enough to power this assembly. ![]() ![]() |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:03. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi