Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Defense back in 2016? (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=140926)

ChuckDickerson 05-01-2016 16:59

Defense back in 2016?
 
So do you think defense will be back this year or do you think the GDC set a precedent last year by removing active robot to robot defense?

notmattlythgoe 05-01-2016 17:00

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ChuckDickerson (Post 1516820)
So do you think defense will be back this year or do you think the GDC set a precedent last year by removing active robot to robot defense?

Well, bumpers are back this year, so I'm assuming there will be at least some form of robot-robot interaction.

JoshWilson 05-01-2016 17:07

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
I don't think they would call it Stronghold if there wasn't some form of defending, so I'm going to say most definitely yes.

Edxu 05-01-2016 17:38

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JoshWilson (Post 1516825)
I don't think they would call it Stronghold if there wasn't some form of defending, so I'm going to say most definitely yes.

This.

Also, I feel like the general feedback for 2013/2014 competitions was much better than that of Recycle Rush, though it's true that for RR, teams could create much more ambitious and creative designs that weren't limited by durability.

2014's Robot-Robot Interaction rules were a bit harsh, and I can quote at least 3 people saying "Week 1 was demolition derby", but I think that if they took 2014's robot interaction rules and made them a bit more specific, defense could be great this year.

jamesmcip 05-01-2016 17:54

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
I think that defense will be back for sure, especially as the game hint seemed to be strongly hinting of a CTF style game. I am somewhat inclined to believe (and hope!) that 2015 was more of an oddball year in terms of the lack of defense and alliance interaction. But hey, we will know in about 3 days, 16 hours, and 33 minutes!

GeeTwo 05-01-2016 19:06

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
Bumpers. Yes.

Bob Potts 05-01-2016 21:22

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
While I don't want to teach Battle bots, I DO love me some good defense!

YES YES YES... please

dudefise 05-01-2016 21:32

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
Yeah. I don't think many particularly liked the whole no-defense thing, even among offensive teams.

Without defense, there isn't much way for upsets to occur except a mistake by the favorite. Matches become a foregone conclusion.

JoshWilson 05-01-2016 22:06

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dudefise (Post 1516932)
Without defense, there isn't much way for upsets to occur except a mistake by the favorite. Matches become a foregone conclusion.

This is so true, and easily the best reason for defense to be reimplemented, aside from making gameplay more exciting.

Christopher149 05-01-2016 23:09

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Edxu (Post 1516835)
though it's true that for RR

I know what you mean, but RR could stand for Recycle Rush, Rebound Rumble, or even Rug Rage.

Monochron 06-01-2016 00:07

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by notmattlythgoe (Post 1516821)
Well, bumpers are back this year, so I'm assuming there will be at least some form of robot-robot interaction.

</thread>

Robosparks2926 07-01-2016 18:59

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesmcip (Post 1516840)
I think that defense will be back for sure, especially as the game hint seemed to be strongly hinting of a CTF style game. I am somewhat inclined to believe (and hope!) that 2015 was more of an oddball year in terms of the lack of defense and alliance interaction. But hey, we will know in about 3 days, 16 hours, and 33 minutes!

possible

Edxu 07-01-2016 19:26

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Christopher149 (Post 1516972)
I know what you mean, but RR could stand for Recycle Rush, Rebound Rumble, or even Rug Rage.

I guess so.

Maybe one day it'll be Rest Relaxation...

InspectorGadget1073 07-01-2016 19:36

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Edxu (Post 1517796)
I guess so.

Maybe one day it'll be Rest Relaxation...

Never. Never in FRC history has this been considered.

GeeTwo 07-01-2016 22:39

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Edxu (Post 1517796)
I guess so.

Maybe one day it'll be Rest Relaxation...

I'd sooner expect:
  • Railroad Rampage
  • Railgun Revenge
  • Ricochet Robot
  • Reciprocating Rhinoceroses
  • Rolling Rubble
  • Rhombus Ramble
  • Rambunctious Rockets, or even
  • River Rapids
before Rest Relaxation.

dirtbikerxz 07-01-2016 22:48

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GeeTwo (Post 1517893)
I'd sooner expect:
  • Railroad Rampage
  • Railgun Revenge
  • Ricochet Robot
  • Reciprocating Rhinoceroses
  • Rolling Rubble
  • Rhombus Ramble
  • Rambunctious Rockets, or even
  • River Rapids
before Rest Relaxation.

Yesss, railgun rampage.

the illuminate 09-01-2016 10:21

Re: Defense back in 2016?
 
The main idea being tossed around is capture the flag and that is bound to have some robot interaction. :yikes: ::ouch:: ::rtm:: :] :cool: It is also believed that there will be a period where the lights will go out and the robots will drive in the dark. Whether it is in autonomous or manual is to be seen.[url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVLdJdoKK2E"]


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi