paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

Thread created automatically to discuss a document in CD-Media.

Talon SRX Breakout Boards by marshall

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

If anyone has questions then let us know. I want to personally thank Team 5190 for reaching out about this project and getting it started. You folks are amazing and we're thrilled to be working with you.

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

Wonderful! The overview of the design process was very helpful. I didn't know such a handy software came in the virtual KOP.
What made you go with an op-amp circuit for the 5c to 3.3v conversion over something like a mosfet? I'm unfamiliar with industrial electronics so it seems odd to me.

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

We thoroughly enjoyed working with the folks from 900.

What started out with a quick email question turned into a collaborative effort that embodies many of the fundamental tenets of FIRST. What a great experience for me and our students to get to know and learn from a great group of people who are right down the road.

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

One thing that helped us is that I use Altium in my day job, so the learning curve for a (very) powerful tool was a little less steep for the students to climb. They took to it rather well and were quite enthusiastic to learn.

Having a buffer with a high resistance divider input reduces the load on the analog circuit being measured and provides a strong signal for the ADC input of the controller. A voltage divider could be used without any buffer circuit, but then the analog input of the motor controller would have to handle the load. This mainly is an issue with ADC acquisition time when you are measuring a circuit with high resistance that is changing at a high rate.

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

This is super cool!

Any issues with access to the "B/C Cal" calibration trigger button or has that not come up?

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

Honestly it's not a problem we've run into at all. You can set it via code so the button is nice but we just don't need it. We didn't use these boards this year because we didn't have any encoders that we felt we needed to use them for but 5190 did and they worked great (though I suspect a Rev 2 will be coming!). We'd like to see them made available to the larger FRC community but we need a supplier for them.

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

Awesome, I hope people continue to make custom circuit boards in the future. I have been a little afraid to design my boards with Altium since you never know if they're going to give donations in following years. I guess I should have the same worry about SolidWorks, so perhaps it's a little unfounded worry.

I released a board prior to build season for an AS5040 sensor that didn't have grounded vias so you didn't have to worry about isolation. IIRC, I changed the mounting dimensions to something that made sense as well.

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

Sweet, thanks for the quick reply. We've been on VictorSP's the last couple years, and now exploring whether it's worth a move to Talons, so knowing "average experiences" is pretty helpful :)

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

Regarding Altium, I could use some help.

Previously I have used PCad - I am used to creating my own library files; I would prefer to use off the shelf files but usually they didn't have the right part.

Picking up with Altium, I only see two libraries in the default distribution.
Can someone please point me to where I can get current component libraries?

This year we prototyped a circuit to turn a flashlight on and off through the RoboRio. With enough knowledge, I am hoping to interest the students in starting to produce actual circuit boards.

I appreciate any assistance!
Really, if I could just get a copy of PCad I think I would be better off!

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

Google is your friend:
https://techdocs.altium.com/display/...load+Libraries
https://designcontent.live.altium.com

Aside from those, you can use the component wizard and then make your own. It's not terrible.

I suspect you can find copies of it on eBay but I could be wrong.

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

I always end up making my own footprints and components anyway.

Ask yourself this...do you really trust components from the internet?

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

It's true but if you get them from the part manufacturer or supplier then they tend to be good.

I'd love to create an altium library with common FRC parts but I don't have the time to invest in it. I hope that part mining becomes easier down the road though and EDA packages start to integrate search in collaboration with shops like Mouser and Digikey... would be nice to troll for parts and be able to import them too.

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

Regarding the library models, what I typically found is that the component I was using wasn't in the library.

I've used a lot of DC-DC converters,circular connectors, fiber transmitters and receivers; things that aren't mainstream, but are needed.

I also found that I could solder 1206 SMT patterns if I made my own pattern with longer pads. I am sure the off the shelf libraries work fine for the professional machines - I was working low quantity prototypes.

Thanks for the google pointer ... I will probably have more questions.

Re: paper: Talon SRX Breakout Boards
 

Still working on the PCB design effort!

I looked into a number of Altium related items; honestly, their library capabilities appear to be a brick wall (perhaps a rock wall!). Most of the library information I can find is targeted at Altium version 10 or below. Their present distribution is at 16. Is anybody really using this package???

I am concentrating on free software versions. The first I ran into was geda. Gnu based and primarily intended for use on Linux systems. I am still working on getting up to speed on both! I think this has the highest payoff if I can make the Windows to Linux transition.

What I have been the most productive with is KiCAD. Free ... windows based ... able to create library entries, able to associate footprints with components. KiCAD is definitely clunky to use, although working through one design gets the user up to speed pretty fast.

I was able to do this in 3 or 4 evenings having never used the package, but with several years of CAD experience ... several years ago!

Comments?