![]() |
Team Update 1
http://www.firstinspires.org/sites/d...al/2016/01.pdf
Update 1 has been released. G11 issue settled! |
Re: Team Update 1
It seems its a little late (time wise, not date wise) for this to be released, good catch!
|
Re: Team Update 1
Well, that settles the G11/G21 discussions pretty thoroughly.
|
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
The update to G21 is clear but potentially concerning. |
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
|
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
Blue End: https://firstfrc.blob.core.windows.n...BlueEnd.vr.jpg Center: https://firstfrc.blob.core.windows.n...6Center.vr.jpg Red End https://firstfrc.blob.core.windows.n...6RedEnd.vr.jpg Spy Box: https://firstfrc.blob.core.windows.n...6SpyBox.vr.jpg |
The update to G21 seems a little too much. It's not a clarification, but an entirely different rule. Why'd they make it regardless of who touches who?
|
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
Basically, the situation was that if Blueabot was in RedaPassage, and Redabot came along and hit Blueabot, TECHNICALLY (due to the usage of "contact" as a verb), Blueabot didn't contact Redabot, so Blueabot doesn't get a penalty; Redabot is blocked from using RedaPassage (potentially), and Redabot is at risk of a G11 for trying to cause Blueabot to get a penalty (but there's a risk of it going to Blueabot for a strategy aimed at trying to get Redabot a G11 penalty). By clarifying that it's regardless of who initiates the contact, the GDC ensures that the Passage remains open, the G11 loop doesn't start, and removes any ambiguity. But, they also allow Blueabot (in the above example) to enter, thus ensuring that a different chokehold (hoarding balls in the Passage) doesn't happen. |
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
|
Re: Team Update 1
I'm kinda surprised they didn't tack the same wording onto G28 to cover courtyard contact in the last 20. The G11 blue box A section implies the same "regardless of who initiates contact" interpretation.
|
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
If the Boulder props open the door so I can back of into the neutral zone? If the Boulder is in the moat, and I drive over the boulder? I wonder what prompted that clarification? I noticed there wasn't any clarification regarding spys and carrier pigeons. |
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
I'm sure the carrier pigeons update will be forth coming! Steve |
Re: Team Update 1
Looks like the GDC reacted solidly to several whispers on the wind. I hope they are ready for the true storm when Q+A shows up.
|
Re: Team Update 1
Quote:
No drones.....Lol. |
Re: Team Update 1
Hard to disagree with the intent, but the "intent" wording of the new blue box opens up a gigantic can of worms for referees.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:14. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi