Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Rules/Strategy (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=141683)

IronicDeadBird 13-01-2016 21:01

2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
So I find G21 scary. I might even call 2016 the year that kit bots were bullied. I originally didn't think twice about shoving a robot out of my courtyard or the neutral zone into my secret passage (in fact shoving a robot out of your courtyard into a defense ends up running into G43) but with this first update the GDC is making it clear what happens when you get caught in your opponents secret passage. The changes to G21 doesn't make pushing a robot into the secret passage a "simple" defensive option, you now are gaining 5 points in score and 1 hit point for the tower. If your robot can't hold its ground in a shoving contest, you are going to find yourself making a match snowball out of control. Anyone have thoughts on this?

The Q&A frowns upon hypothetical situations, but I have a hypothetical situation which I imagine will happen a lot during competition.
Robot A is pushing Robot B
Robot B is capable of moving in one direction (therefore it does not qualify as a pin)
HOWEVER
If Robot B does move in said direction it violates any of the following rules
G21 The only direction Robot B could move is into an opposing robot in their secret passage
G27 Robot B is carrying a boulder and it could escape the pin by moving into the secret passage
And of course god forbid G45

Q&A Hype!

Lil' Lavery 13-01-2016 21:06

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
So, you're saying teams should lay out a strategy in which they seek to gain advantage solely from forcing the opposing alliance to take a penalty?

IronicDeadBird 13-01-2016 21:07

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 1523178)
So, you're saying teams should lay out a strategy in which they seek to gain advantage solely from forcing the opposing alliance to take a penalty?

No I'm saying I don't have many defensive options in my courtyard that doesn't have the potential of forcing a penalty. Which I am not happy about.

kyle_hamblett 13-01-2016 21:41

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
IIRC, there was a lot of this in 2012/2013. Teams trying to long shot the Frisbee would often have another robot trying to push the defensive bot into the "safe zone". Same with the key in 2012. It seems like there will be a lot of that this year, but it's not new.

thatnameistaken 13-01-2016 21:51

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by IronicDeadBird (Post 1523175)
The changes to G21 doesn't make pushing a robot into the secret passage a "simple" defensive option, you now are gaining 5 points in score and 1 hit point for the tower. If your robot can't hold its ground in a shoving contest, you are going to find yourself making a match snowball out of control. Anyone have thoughts on this?

...what? The blue box added to G11 makes what happens here quite clear:
Quote:

B. A Red ROBOT is parked in the NEUTRAL ZONE near the Blue
SECRET PASSAGE. A Blue ROBOT pushes the Red ROBOT into
the Blue SECRET PASSAGE, then drives away. There is no violation
of G21 by the Red ROBOT, as the Red ROBOT was forced by the
Blue ROBOT into the SECRET PASSAGE. The Blue ROBOT has
violated G11 by forcing the Red ROBOT into the SECRET PASSAGE
for the sole purpose of causing them to violate G21.
While this is from the neutral zone, the concept is the same. G11 on the pushing robot.

As for the rest:
Quote:

Originally Posted by IronicDeadBird (Post 1523175)
G21 The only direction Robot B could move is into an opposing robot in their secret passage

Outlined above. This is a G11 on Robot A.

Quote:

Originally Posted by IronicDeadBird (Post 1523175)
G27 Robot B is carrying a boulder and it could escape the pin by moving into the secret passage

1. This only applies in the neutral zone.
2. I don't see how holding a bolder changes the result of the G11 blue box.

Quote:

Originally Posted by IronicDeadBird (Post 1523175)
And of course god forbid G45

...I don't see how being forced OVER the low bar could even happen. If you're taller than the low bar, standard pinning rules apply.

IronicDeadBird 13-01-2016 21:55

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thatnameistaken (Post 1523192)
...what? The blue box added to G11 makes what happens hear quite clear:

G11 on the pushing robot.

As for the rest:

Outlined above. This is a G11 on Robot A.


1. This only applies in the neutral zone.
2. I don't see how holding a bolder changes the result of the G11 blue box.


...I don't see how being forced OVER the low bar could even happen. If you're taller than the low bar, standard pinning rules apply.

Its absolutely clear how much you can punish someone for bad positioning thats the major point here.

thatnameistaken 13-01-2016 22:16

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by IronicDeadBird (Post 1523197)
Its absolutely clear how much you can punish someone for bad positioning thats the major point here.

Alright. Re-reading your initial post, I think I understand where you're coming from a bit better, but just to clarify: who is punishing whom for bad positioning?

Edit: I initially read your post with the assumption that Robot A can not only freely push Robot B into A's secret passage, but B will get a tech foul in the end. Is this what you meant? Because this is not the case, per the G11 clarifications.

IronicDeadBird 13-01-2016 22:22

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thatnameistaken (Post 1523218)
Alright. Re-reading your initial post, I think I understand where you're coming from a bit better, but just to clarify: who is punishing whom for bad positioning?

In this years game if you position your robot is in a bad position at anytime during a match you can get punished for it heavily.

EricH 13-01-2016 22:26

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by IronicDeadBird (Post 1523220)
In this years game if you position your robot is in a bad position at anytime during a match you can get punished for it heavily.

And who's fault is that?

And how is that new?


2005: Go anywhere NEAR the loading zones, risk losing 30 points. More than one team lost a match that way.
2008: Spin too close to a line, lose points.
2012: See "Lane".
2011: Same thing...

thatnameistaken 13-01-2016 22:28

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by IronicDeadBird (Post 1523220)
In this years game if you position your robot is in a bad position at anytime during a match you can get punished for it heavily.

According to the G11 clarifications, the only time this is true is when you willingly put your robot in the opponent's secret passage. No other time.

IronicDeadBird 13-01-2016 22:40

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by EricH (Post 1523225)
And who's fault is that?

And how is that new?


2005: Go anywhere NEAR the loading zones, risk losing 30 points. More than one team lost a match that way.
2008: Spin too close to a line, lose points.
2012: See "Lane".
2011: Same thing...

It is the fault of those who are unaware. It is not new at all to you because you have been through it. However to new teams, to rookie teams this is an entirely new experience. I really just hope this game isn't so punishing it turns teams away from FRC.

IronicDeadBird 13-01-2016 22:45

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by thatnameistaken (Post 1523228)
According to the G11 clarifications, the only time this is true is when you willingly put your robot in the opponent's secret passage. No other time.

If the GDC wanted to they could have made the secret passage a safe zone, instead they gave it complex mechanics. The secret passage is dangerous but it isn't without its rewards.

thatnameistaken 13-01-2016 23:01

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by IronicDeadBird (Post 1523240)
If the GDC wanted to they could have made the secret passage a safe zone, instead they gave it complex mechanics. The secret passage is dangerous but it isn't without its rewards.

Yes. This is the idea. Stealing a boulder from your opponent's secret passage is a high risk/high reward strategy. Not being familiar with this may hurt rookies (or any team founded since 2014, really), as you stated earlier. However, not being familiar with the intricacies of the rules can always hurt any team, and always will.

I still don't think this is as complex as you're making it out to be, though. Essentially:
-Only enter your opponent's secret passage from the courtyard.
-If you go in your opponent's secret passage, don't get touched.
-Don't push your opponent into your own secret passage for no reason.

...and that's it, really. I suppose this is comparatively more complex than just "don't go in", but every team is supposed to thoroughly read the manual. For whatever reason, the GDC decided you should be able to take boulders from your opponent's secret passage (though if I had to hazard a guess, I'd say it's so an alliance with a big enough lead can't just hoard all the boulders in their secret passage and sit there for the rest of the match).

asid61 13-01-2016 23:03

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by IronicDeadBird (Post 1523233)
It is the fault of those who are unaware. It is not new at all to you because you have been through it. However to new teams, to rookie teams this is an entirely new experience. I really just hope this game isn't so punishing it turns teams away from FRC.

I think as long as they read the rules this shouldn't be new. Even learning of it at the event should not be very damaging to a rookie team.
There are always ways to get fouls and team updates change the rules. I don't see how this is different from any other ball game.

IronicDeadBird 13-01-2016 23:10

Re: 2016: The year of bullying kitbots and hypothetical situations
 
Someone absolutely correct me if I am wrong, but I am not finding another game where game mechanics were changed during a match due to technical fouls.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:33.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi