![]() |
no tensioner 8 wheel belt drive: tooth skip ?
If you accurately drill bearing holes using WCPs belt distance calculator and the 2 cim transmission power is split between 2 belts (each to a wheel and then to another wheel via a 2nd belt) and the bot is driven aggressively (ie can push and be quite fast) and the wheels are cantilevered immediately off a frame (as opposed to supported at both sides by a frame)....
Will the 15mm belts (on 24 tooth pulleys) stretch enough over the season to need a belt tensioner or replacement (else they skip pulley teeth) during the season ? I'm also concerned the axles with its 2 bearings (in a 1" wide frame) might twist slightly introducing slack in the belt leading to tooth skip. I heard at least one team say theirs lasted the season with no tensioner and no belt replacements. What was your experience (how many wheels, cantilevered or not, belt type, width) ? Thanks |
Re: no tensioner 8 wheel belt drive: tooth skip ?
If you have not done it before, I would recommend against it. Your drivetrain alone can score you many points, and an inoperational one could shut you down this game.
I know many teams have done 24t 15mm before with success, but I don't know how many used direct C-C distance or how much they added/subtracted to the distance. What do you mean by "accurately drilling"? I would definitely not do this with a drill press or something. |
Re: no tensioner 8 wheel belt drive: tooth skip ?
Quote:
|
Re: no tensioner 8 wheel belt drive: tooth skip ?
Quote:
|
Re: no tensioner 8 wheel belt drive: tooth skip ?
All great ideas. Thanks
Time for a prototype! |
Re: no tensioner 8 wheel belt drive: tooth skip ?
We have run this setup with no failures before. Bearing holes were created via a laser cutter.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:01. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi