Chief Delphi - Is Bowling thought the Low Bar legal

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)

- General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)

- - Is Bowling thought the Low Bar legal (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=142014)

Re: Is Bowling thought the Low Bar legal

Quote:

Originally Posted by rich2202 (Post 1525725)

Instead of the robot holding the cloth, how about the robot in the shape of a wedge, and the boulder "hits" the robot and "bounces" over the low bar?

Legal currently however at any time they could pull the "intent of game" clause like they did for holding low bar carpet up by bot. I would not count on that strategy.

Re: Is Bowling thought the Low Bar legal

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chak (Post 1525744)

Similar to the OP's solution, I think that this would probably be physically impossible.
Even if you figure out a way to do it, this robot would be violating G40.

You would receive a tech foul per boulder, unless this robot follows every boulder through the defense. In that case, any robot with an effective floor intake would be able to perform the same function in a more feasible way.

If the bot is in the outerworks (in order to contact in the outerworks zone), 4 boulders are bowled, and then the robot drives through to the other side before any other bot touches a boulder.

Re: Is Bowling thought the Low Bar legal

Quote:

Originally Posted by rich2202 (Post 1525818)

If the bot is in the outerworks (in order to contact in the outerworks zone), 4 boulders are bowled, and then the robot drives through to the other side before any other bot touches a boulder.

G40 starts with "A ROBOT may not cause a BOULDER....". "a BOULDER" is singular, and it then goes on to state the required conditions. If you deflect multiple BOULDERS into COURTYARD you are violating the conditions (did not complete the CROSSING) and incur a TECH FOUL per BOULDER.

Also, G40-1 was added to clarify the intent, that only ROBOTS can move BOULDERS, one at a time, into the COURTYARD. This also came up in the Q&A.

Re: Is Bowling thought the Low Bar legal

If a human player where to enter the ball in fast enough and get it over the ramp parts in slot 2 (next to the low bar) is it legal?

Re: Is Bowling thought the Low Bar legal

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylan179 (Post 1526004)

If a human player where to enter the ball in fast enough and get it over the ramp parts in slot 2 (next to the low bar) is it legal?

As the rules currently stand? Yes. Is it against the intent of the rules? Yes. Also, I would play around with the physics of the field, but I don't actually think it's possible to get an angle on the Ramparts from the Embrasure from the HP station.

Re: Is Bowling thought the Low Bar legal

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylan179 (Post 1526004)

If a human player where to enter the ball in fast enough and get it over the ramp parts in slot 2 (next to the low bar) is it legal?

As the rules stand right now (after update 2) it is legal. The only rule regarding the HUMAN PLAYER and BOULDER interaction is G33, and there are no restrictions on where the BOULDER has to end up, just how it has to enter the FIELD. There have been claims that some HUMAN PLAYERS have been able to kick the BOULDERS over the DEFENSES into the COURTYARD, which also is currently legal. I suspect this will prove to be difficult and very inconsistent.

However, there is no guarantee that the RAMPARTS are going to end up next to the LOW BAR, and realistically if any team thinks anyone can bowl through there they are going to select a different DEFENSE that is harder to bowl over. Remember, per section 5.5.10, the opposing ALLIANCE chooses the DEFENSES in slots 2,4,and 5 and they have control which choice goes where.