![]() |
How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
I started as a FIRST student in 2004. to my knowledge we've always used 2 CIMS per side on the standard "tank drive" type setup. We used mecanum wheels once which required independent drive of 1 CIM per wheel.
Does anybody have any (scientific) input on using only 1 CIM per side? (2 total) how about 6 CIM drive? |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
We also did octocanum for about five years, and could beast through just about everyone...except for 6 CIM drivetrains, despite being geared down about as preposterously low as you could get, and with great traction. I would strongly recommend not going to one per side--you'll lose every pushing match you get into with a four-CIM drivetrain, and each of those CIMs are going to draw more current, work harder, get hotter, and drain your battery more than four or six. The only advantage is weight, and it's not a good enough tradeoff. |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
has anyone ever done a drivetrain with more than 6 motors? (not including steering for swerve)
|
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Here's a quick calculation using MCALC to compare one CIM drawing 60 amps at 12 volts vs two CIMs each drawing 30 amps at 12 volts: Code:
Motor Calculator build MCALC_2014d 2/3/2014 1255pm332 watts output mechanical power 388 watts waste heat two CIMs each drawing 30 amps at 12 volts: 447 watts output mechanical power 273 watts waste heat |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
We did a 2 CIM drivetrain last year, but Recycle Rush was definitely a special case; you didn't want to accelerate quickly or drive very fast. We're starting with 4 this year, and if we change it, we'll be going to six.
Quote:
|
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
That year we ran 4 CIMs + 4 Mini-CIMs in our shifting 8in Mecanum Drivetrain. Looking back, mecanum probably wasn't the best choice that year with the heavy defense (:ahh:), but we sure tried our hardest to make it work. For the most part it did, and we were able to handle many defensive situations with the great traction of the extremely wide wheels, but the cons far outweighed the benefit. With 8 CIM-motors, we had the potential to run 320 Amps of current into our drivetrain before any of the individual 40A breakers would trip. Even operating well below that, there was incredible risk for popping the main breaker, not to mention browning out components, both of which happened in matches on multiple occasions. In high gear, any defensive situation was almost always a brown-out and radio reboot on the field. In low gear, we had maybe 10 seconds before a brown-out. With the current sensing capabilities of the new PDP, careful software could allow a team to more safely run this kind of setup, but back then, it was far more risk than the team could effectively manage or I would ever recommend. |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
We talked about using 6 cims for a all terrain off season robot. I've got a couple 36v motors I'm going to donate though.
The team is considering 2 CIM drive this year. I'm not recommending that, especially with tank treads. I think they will change their minds when they see how poorly it performs after the chassis is built. Hopefully we can drive it this weekend. Maybe I'll be proven wrong though.. |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
I know that 2 cims will be capable of more torque, I'm just wondering how noticeable it will be from the perspective of the driver. |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
Quote:
447+273 = 720 total watts consumed (two CIMs) They both consume the same power @ 12 volts @ 60 amps, but you get more output mechanical power and less waste heat with two CIMs. So you don't need as many amps with the 2 CIMs to get the same output power as 1 CIM. |
We had 2 added 2 more today. Only problem is we were only able to get one screw in each Cim. We will try more probably making a tool to get in there but, we sadly have run a drive train an entire season using 1 screw per Cim and can verify it works.
|
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
You're specifying X amount CIMs at 60 amps. It is manufacturing a theoretical load that will require 60 amps.
The load is different. What happens if you specify a load? |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
We are going to be running either a 6 CIM drive or a 4 CIM drive depending on our lift mechanism. At this point in the build we are using the 6. 3 on each side.
|
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
General rule of thumb for motors (at least what I was taught in college): A motor is most efficient when run exactly at the rated power output. More or less will result in a drop in efficiency. Obviously the latter is a better scenario than the latter, but in terms of % efficiency, all else being equal, going overkill isn't an improvement.
That said, it's far easier for a 2 cim drive to get pushed past the rated output, and given that batteries are usually recharged between matches, the time when efficiency (for realistic practical FRC purposes) counts is under full load (read: shoving match), so that's why a 2 cim drive will overheat and (probably) draw more amps in such a scenario. The reason 6 cim drives lead to brownouts is not a motor issue per se; it's simply that such a drivetrain has more capability than a single battery can provide (at a voltage that the control electronics/VRMs can handle). So, realistically, in a FRC legal robot, you'll never see the full potential of a 6 cim drivetrain. You may see more than a 4 cim, sure, but you'll probably never get to full load simply because the battery can only give so much power (internal resistance is the limiting factor assuming good battery wiring). Hence the need for brownout prevention for such drivetrains. |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
Maximum power occurs when P(out)=radial velocity * torque is maximized, which is at half free speed and half stall torque. Maximum efficiency occurs when P(out) / P(in), or (radial velocity * torque) / (current * voltage) is maximized. This always occurs somewhere between the maximum power point and free speed (it varies from motor to motor depending on free current). |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
The max efficiency occurs at a higher speed. EDIT: Jared beat me to it. |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Roughly, max efficiency occurs at 1/6 of stall torque. That means that you are also operating at 5/6 of free speed.
P(out)_eff=(T_stall/6)*(5*w_free/6) = 5/36*T_stall*w_free P(out)_max = (T_stall/2)*(w_free/2) = 9/36*T_stall*w_free So for a 300W CIM you should be able to count on 54% P(out)_max or 167W at max efficiency. Edit: Reviewing motors.vexrobotics.com this is good enough for picking gear ratios but not exactly accurate for bag and 775pro. Of course, picking an initial gear ratio should lead to further testing and measurement. This rule of thumb lets you choose gear ratios in your head and predict mechanism performance on the back of a napkin which is where all the real engineering happens. |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
1 CIM solution: 9.73 gear ratio, 46.2 amps @ 12 volts, 255 watts waste heat, 54.1% efficiency 2 CIM solution: 12.75 gear ratio, 38.6 amps @ 12 volts, 164 watts waste heat, 64.7% efficiency |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
I realize that load isn't a constant when you're talking about acceleration, but there are situations where a single motor would be more efficient. Aside from limiting inrush current you could never *decide* that you're going to apply 60 amps to a running motor who's continuous load only requires 20 amps. If I had a windows machine I'd mess around with mcalc, looks like a nifty program |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
In your MCalc32 equation sheet you say power_out = speed * torque. Given your Speed (2975) and the torque (1.066) I'm confused how you get 332.2 W out. Edit: admittedly the only reason I noticed this was I don't have a windows machine and liked the concept of MCalc so started a Go version. (I also needed to learn Go for a project at work and this seemed like a simple program) |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
Convert 2975 rpm to 2975/60*2pi = 311.5 radians per second 311.5 rad/sec * 1.066 Nm = 332 Nm/sec = 332 joules/sec = 332 watts |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
|
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
|
So wouldn't it be more efficient to power all wheels independently with CIMs so that they have less wasted energy due to slipping or one wheel getting less traction?
|
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
|
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
Obviously with larger loads the two CIM gearbox will be more efficient (at one CIM's stall load, the single CIM gearbox is stalled and therefore has 0% efficiency, whereas the two CIM gearbox is near its max power point). At lower loads, the one CIM gearbox will be more efficient (at some tiny load just >0, both gearboxes are running at roughly free speed, but the two CIM gearbox is drawing twice as much current). |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
Quote:
(Sorry for the misinformation, I feel kinda dumb here). |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
A lot of interesting discussion (and Math) in this thread.
What are peoples thoughts on using a combination of CIMs and MiniCIMs in drive systems? My team is planning on using 4 CIMs + 2 MiniCIMs in our drive system for the second time this year (on a pair of 3 CIM ball shifters). Do you loose efficiency doing this due to the differences in the MiniCIM performance? Worth the extra weight? |
Re: How many CIMs in your drivetrain?
Quote:
CIM FR801 001, AM802 001A @ 12.00 volts oz-in=45.6, Nm=0.322, rpm=86.7, amps=20, watts out = 155.3, watts heat is 84.7 and eff% = 64.7 So I'm seeing the three CIMs each drawing 20 amps at 12 volts: 465.9 watts output mechanical power 254.1 watts waste heat vs these two choices that Ether's calculations from before. one CIM drawing 60 amps at 12 volts: 332 watts output mechanical power 388 watts waste heat two CIMs each drawing 30 amps at 12 volts: 447 watts output mechanical power 273 watts waste heat So not as much of a gain in efficiency improvement as I had hoped, but the package is still capable of much more. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi