Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro! (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=142356)

R.C. 22-01-2016 17:43

WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Hi Teams,



We are thrilled to announce our 2016 MCC Robot powered by VEXpro!

Related information is available here: http://www.wcproducts.net/mcc2016

Notes/Disclaimers:
  • The reversing of the balls over the obstacles is illegal, it is shown in the video for good fun!
  • The hanger was done to show what can be done with COTS parts, we encourage teams to improve upon it and make it more visibly legal

Special thanks to Gary Chahal, Andrew Nabors, Elias Avila and Andrew Lawrence for helping out with this project.

Andrew Schreiber 22-01-2016 17:55

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R.C. (Post 1528619)
Hi Teams,



We are thrilled to announce our 2016 MCC Robot powered by VEXpro!

Related information is available here: http://www.wcproducts.net/mcc2016

Notes/Disclaimers:
  • The reversing of the balls over the obstacles is illegal, it is shown in the video for good fun!
  • The hanger was done to show what can be done with COTS parts, we encourage teams to improve upon it and make it more visibly legal

Special thanks to Gary Chahal, Andrew Nabors, Elias Avila and Andrew Lawrence for helping out with this project.

Hella.

Lil' Lavery 22-01-2016 17:56

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Looks oddly familiar...

nuclearnerd 22-01-2016 17:58

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Very nice design. Definitely a worthy contender. I especially like how the rotation manages to stay within the frame perimeter extension rules during the scale.

Unfortunately the CAD links are broken, otherwise I'd love to dig into it more.

JackFisher 22-01-2016 18:01

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Build season done

R.C. 22-01-2016 18:03

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nuclearnerd (Post 1528630)
Very nice design. Definitely a worthy contender. I especially like how the rotation manages to stay within the frame perimeter extension rules during the scale.

Unfortunately the CAD links are broken, otherwise I'd love to dig into it more.

Try again! I did goof.

Knufire 22-01-2016 18:14

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
This looks really similar to our robot...guess we're doing something right. Might steal a few tricks though. ;)

kyle_hamblett 22-01-2016 18:16

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Great concept. Was it just me or did I see something that seemed to resemble a Poofs bot in the background?

DRow 22-01-2016 18:19

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kyle_hamblett (Post 1528639)
Great concept. Was it just me or did I see something that seemed to resemble a Poofs bot in the background?

Looks more like a 1323 robot to me. :rolleyes:

JesseK 22-01-2016 18:40

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
We tested 6" wheels in a mock setup but found that the 2" clearance scrapes the rough terrain in some cases. For a WCP gearbox setup, this means that the transmission plates/gears themselves may take a beating in the long term. Remember, the WCP gearboxes stick down below the frame quite a bit.

For this reason we added 1x1x1/16" 'skid rails' for the entire rear half of the robot, where our WCP DS gearboxes live (non-direct drive due to 8" wheels). This testing has performed really well no matter how we throw it at the rough terrain.

How does this MCC cope with the rough terrain clearance in the long-term? It's a question for the general forum to come up with an answer rather than a criticism of the design - I suspect chains, belts and gearboxes alike will need a solution.

marshall 22-01-2016 19:00

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
This is awesome.

Lil' Lavery 22-01-2016 19:07

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Regarding the quotes at the end of the video/on the site, I have one dispute. Only Jared (254) mentioned the end game. I feel it is absolutely essential for a MCC robot to be able to participate in a tower capture. Alliance captains are not going to select 3rd robots who can't help them get those 20 points in eliminations. Keep in mind, MCC robots need to be able to distinguish themselves from others. You really don't want the way you're different than other potential picks to be that they can challenge, and you cannot. While it's not a "difficult" design challenge to fit on the batter, it requires some thought ahead of time in your frame dimensions.

Obviously, the actual design is capable, but I wish that was highlighted more.

Ty Tremblay 22-01-2016 19:20

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
From the website:
Quote:

Kits will be available for purchase.
What does this mean? How close to a game specific solution are these kits?

Chris is me 22-01-2016 19:25

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery (Post 1528671)
Regarding the quotes at the end of the video/on the site, I have one dispute. Only Jared (254) mentioned the end game. I feel it is absolutely essentially for a MCC robot to be able to participate in a tower capture. Alliance captains are not going to select 3rd robots who can't help them get those 20 points in eliminations. Keep in mind, MCC robots need to be able to distinguish themselves from others. You really don't want the way you're different than other potential picks to be that they can challenge, and you cannot. While it's not a "difficult" design challenge to fit on the batter, it requires some thought ahead of time in your frame dimensions.

Obviously, the actual design is capable, but I wish that was highlighted more.

Really, I think it's far more important to be able to do this than it is to be able to hang, which isn't really something I think an MCC robot must be able to do. Some competitive robots won't be able to hang.

That aside, this is an excellent robot and a great resource for teams who are stuck at the moment. Great job WCP!

PayneTrain 22-01-2016 19:26

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DRow (Post 1528641)
Looks more like a 1323 robot to me. :rolleyes:

Nah, there isn't any questionable use of an elevator anywhere on here.

MrBasse 22-01-2016 19:27

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nuclearnerd (Post 1528630)
Very nice design. Definitely a worthy contender. I especially like how the rotation manages to stay within the frame perimeter extension rules during the scale.

Unfortunately the CAD links are broken, otherwise I'd love to dig into it more.

Does it stay in? That sure looks way over 15" to me off the back/top of the robot.

R.C. 22-01-2016 19:30

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ty Tremblay (Post 1528676)
From the website:


What does this mean? How close to a game specific solution are these kits?

Sorry need to put more info, most if not all of the robot is COTS components sold through VEXpro or WCP. There are a few pieces we had to custom make and have had customers ask us if we'd have those parts available. We are hoping to make specific parts available that teams can't easily produce.

Ty Tremblay 22-01-2016 19:31

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R.C. (Post 1528683)
Sorry need to put more info, most if not all of the robot is COTS components sold through VEXpro or WCP. There are a few pieces we had to custom make and have had customers ask us if we'd have those parts available. We are hoping to make specific parts available that teams can't easily produce.

Whew. Glad to hear that this didn't mean WCP would be selling a bot-in-a-box.

R.C. 22-01-2016 19:38

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ty Tremblay (Post 1528684)
Whew. Glad to hear that this didn't mean WCP would be selling a bot-in-a-box.

Ty,

Yeah we don't want to sell pre boxed g2g solutions. We've been getting a ton of customer calls and emails about how to integrate the PTO and how to do various other tasks in this game. We thought it would help teams if we were able to put something together.

Jared Russell 22-01-2016 20:33

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris is me (Post 1528677)
Really, I think it's far more important to be able to do this than it is to be able to hang, which isn't really something I think an MCC robot must be able to do. Some competitive robots won't be able to hang.

Absolutely. This is a great example and resource for the community, but there certainly exists a "Minimum-er Competitive Concept".

The true minimal set of capabilities is something like:
  • Be able to cross at least one group of terrain reliably
  • Be able to contribute something to the boulder aspect of the game (whether moving balls, scoring them, or playing defense on opponents attempting to score)
  • Be able to help the alliance achieve the CAPTURE bonus

This boils down to a well-executed drivetrain and some sort of ball manipulator, which as this video shows is totally doable using COTS parts. Every team in FRC should be able to accomplish these tasks (though I'm sure some will not).

Hanging and going under the low bar are certainly nice features to have and may make you more attractive to alliances, but that's just gravy.

Jeremy Germita 22-01-2016 21:11

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PayneTrain (Post 1528678)
Nah, there isn't any questionable use of an elevator anywhere on here.

I don't think their newer robots have enough fourbar. :)

Eugene Fang 22-01-2016 21:23

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeremy Germita (Post 1528716)
I don't think their newer robots have enough fourbar. :)


Karthik 22-01-2016 21:54

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Great song choice.

PayneTrain 22-01-2016 22:05

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eugene Fang (Post 1528718)

The kind of design that has the GDC quaking in their boots.

"Guys, we never saw the four bar in a shooting game coming? How could we have been so blind? We have to change the way we design games!"

I mean, I'm not saying that 1323 caused Recycle Rush; I just want to know if there is any evidence to the contrary that could counteract a potential smear campaign.

(I'm snowed in and really bored)

Akash Rastogi 22-01-2016 22:15

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Those wheels look absolutely gorgeous.

Great stuff RC & co.

Collin Stiers 22-01-2016 22:41

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
watching the video something was slightly unclear, how do the hooks detach from the extanda-climber thing, is it painters tape, because that's what it looked like in the video

Fusion_Clint 22-01-2016 23:30

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Nice concept, however it looks like you extended past 15" during scaling.

evanperryg 22-01-2016 23:51

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Karthik (Post 1528725)
Great song choice.

I may or may not have nerded out at the King Crimson samples... :D
praise to our lord and savior Robert Fripp

Anyway, this is really impressive for how simple it is. I really like the climber design, I'm definitely going to take a closer look at it.

CalTran 22-01-2016 23:59

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R.C. (Post 1528619)
[*]The hanger was done to show what can be done with COTS parts, we encourage teams to improve upon it and make it more visibly legal

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBasse (Post 1528679)
Does it stay in? That sure looks way over 15" to me off the back/top of the robot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fusion_Clint (Post 1528764)
Nice concept, however it looks like you extended past 15" during scaling.

They're aware that it's not exactly legal. They didn't want to do all the work. ::rolleyes::

Eugene Fang 23-01-2016 01:23

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fusion_Clint (Post 1528764)
Nice concept, however it looks like you extended past 15" during scaling.

It looks like only the telescoping part of the arm that initially latches the hook extends past 15". If that retracted during the hang, it would stay within 15"

vigneshv 23-01-2016 01:26

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
How did you power the telescoping part of your arm (I wasn't sure from the CAD)?

Justin Montois 23-01-2016 01:59

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DesignComp (Post 1528790)
All this misinformation is actually making me post (well, my friend who runs this account is posting for me, but still) - climb is legal within 1/4". It's really pushing it, but it fits, so y'all should stop saying it doesn't. We suggest teams develop a better way to make it clearer that it's legal with their own methods.

-Andrew Lawrence

It's also worth mentioning that most of the "extending outside the 15" perimeter" Issues will be dealt with during inspection. The only time I've ever seen it called on the field in prior years is when a robot is "flailing" something obviously outside the frame. These +/- a few inches calls during scaling won't be made by the referee crew because it's not realistic for them to see when a robot is 16" outside of it's frame for a split second during a fast climb.

This is why I expected a change to G18 during scaling. Every one said it's supposed to be hard and things like that but for me it came down to can it be called easily be the referee and/or checked during inspection. The answer to both of these questions is no. And rules you cannot enforce should not be rules.

MrBasse 23-01-2016 10:08

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Justin Montois (Post 1528791)
It's also worth mentioning that most of the "extending outside the 15" perimeter" Issues will be dealt with during inspection. The only time I've ever seen it called on the field in prior years is when a robot is "flailing" something obviously outside the frame. These +/- a few inches calls during scaling won't be made by the referee crew because it's not realistic for them to see when a robot is 16" outside of it's frame for a split second during a fast climb.

This is why I expected a change to G18 during scaling. Every one said it's supposed to be hard and things like that but for me it came down to can it be called easily be the referee and/or checked during inspection. The answer to both of these questions is no. And rules you cannot enforce should not be rules.

That doesn't mean you should knowingly break the rule and hide it in inspection. I've seen teams do this in the past and got a hint of that from your post. Teams should never look at this as a viable solution to play the game.

PayneTrain 23-01-2016 11:41

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBasse (Post 1528827)
That doesn't mean you should knowingly break the rule and hide it in inspection. I've seen teams do this in the past and got a hint of that from your post. Teams should never look at this as a viable solution to play the game.

How do you get that? It should be on the team and the inspector to clearly cover the way robot mechanisms perform before it even gets to the field. Referees don't test for steroids in Major League Baseball.

Just feels needlessly accusatory.

MrBasse 23-01-2016 12:23

Re: WCP MCC Robot 2016 powered by VEXpro!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PayneTrain (Post 1528865)
How do you get that? It should be on the team and the inspector to clearly cover the way robot mechanisms perform before it even gets to the field. Referees don't test for steroids in Major League Baseball.

Just feels needlessly accusatory.

Nothing accusatory, unless there are some concerns from the one doing the reading. I'm sure that you have seen others skirt the rules in the past, as Im sure Justin probably has. Whether it be here or in any other part of life, having something that follows the rules when inspected closely and then abandons them when there us no clear way to catch a violation is wrong. Volkswagen comes to mind, as does recent Mini Cooper crash testing issues.

When I said that I didn't mean to imply that he had cheated in the past or was saying it was okay to do so. But if rookie teams or veteran teams with a lot of fresh membership read something written as it was, they might assume that as long as you pass inspection you can do whatever you want since there is no way to enforce it. I have seen it in the past with rookies and even some well respected veteran teams.

I just want to be sure that everyone stays on the right side of the rules to keep things the way they should be.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi