![]() |
Gear Teeth Clearance
So my team is building a gear system and we had to make the solidworks for the individual gears ourselves. What should be a clearance between each tooth for the robot to function? The gears are small, 1.5 inch to 0.75 inch. Can we get away with 0.017" of clearance after running them for a while so they set oooor nooo...?
|
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
Pitch Diameter?
Number of teeth? Spur Gear? What are you using to lay out your gear geometry in solidworks? |
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
Can you provide more detail like material, intended use, or how the gears will be made?
It sounds like you're trying to design your own gear tooth profile, which is a really bad idea. Instead, try using existing gear pitches/modules. |
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
Spur Gear, Pitch diameter=1.5/16? 13 to 12 tooth, then 12 to 32 tooth, Aluminium (or maybe steel) CNC milled or waterjet
|
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
Intended use is our little rookie secret but it's for a major part of our robot which will see alot of motion
|
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
https://www.bostongear.com/pdf/gear_theory.pdf
This should help with some of the clearance (backlash?) questions you have, as it would have been what I would use for reference. If you have a copy of the Machinery Handbook it would also help and provide guidance. I had said Pitch Diameter, but really the Diametral Pitch you choose for the gears determines what diameter you have, as well as the amount of backlash you should expect, though the criticality of the backlash is only if you are going to move the mechanism back and forth often. Also keep in mind manufacturing tolerances tied to the machine you are making them with. The teeth may grow or shrink due to this, either increasing or decreasing the clearance you experience. I would also recommend not making gears out of aluminum unless you plan on anodizing them. Aluminum on aluminum tends to gall. |
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
I'll see what we can do for steel then, thanks
|
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
I am definitely not an expert at gear design. I have designed some limited gear systems for FRC in the past, but not with custom made gears. I do have some experience with custom made sprockets, which I used the Machinery/Machinists Handbook as guidance (back in 2001 when I was still in high school). I think most CAD programs tend to have "canned" operations to make gear/sprocket profiles now.
|
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
Yeah I think so, we just used the circular pattern to line the gear teeth around the base radius then went from there
|
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
Quote:
|
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
I would strongly recommend reconsidering this approach. Your rookie year is hard enough (even if you have some experienced mentors). Don't screw around doing something exotic you've never done before. Get COTS gears. Modify them if you really need to.
You will not be able to mill or waterjet a true involute tooth profile. If the gears in question only mesh with each other, an approximation would be fine. The best way to do this yourself is to get involute tooth cutters for the mill and a indexer so that you can cut them. This requires a series of cutters to cover all possible tooth sizes. |
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
Second what Cory said. If you really want to stick to it though, Solidworks Toolbox should be able to generate you a gear model without having to sketch an involute profile.
|
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
We'll Show you WE'LL SHOW ALL OF YOU.
See you at worlds With love: 5870 <3 |
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
Quote:
Making gears is work, I mean legit work. Would recommend just buying some off the shelf. |
Re: Gear Teeth Clearance
Quote:
To get gears that are as accurate as any COTS Vex or Andymark gear you would need involute gear cutters. CNC mills would need a tiny endmill to do gears, and waterjet is inaccurate and has an extreme taper. If you buy a COTS gear, the two pitch circles should be tangent to each other exactly. But using your method, I would want 0.004" or more of clearance depending on how you are making them. Your gears will be less efficient and more likely to bind than any COTS gear, not to mention will take far more hours than COTS. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi