![]() |
Re: Strange mDNS behavior
Quote:
We used mDNS dynamic IPs for all of the beta testing season and it worked very well as long as we used that computer only as a driver station, where the only active network interface was connected to an SSID "1519" Cisco router, with the OM5P-AN in bridge mode. However, if we changed to our preferred situation of having two active network interfaces: (1) a physical ethernet cable to an SSID "1519" Cisco router, and (2) a WiFi DHCP connection to a different WiFi network for Internet access, we would get very unpredictable results. Switching to a static IP address (the correct 10.te.am.2 address) helps a lot with the issues we've been seeing. For what it's worth, we competed at the "Week Zero" scrimmage event in NH with the real FIRST field using the correct (10.te.am.2) static IP address and encountered zero problems. Call me paranoid, but I remain a big believer in using static IP addresses for the roboRIO, the OM5P-AN bridge, any other IP devices on the robot (we use 1 or 2 Axis 206 cameras), the driver station laptop, and (when at our build area) the router which serves the "TEAM" SSID network (e.g. "1519"). |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:41. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi