Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Rules/Strategy (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Low Bar Flap (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144269)

aruk5h 20-02-2016 19:51

Low Bar Flap
 
I was watching the week 0 competition, and one of the teams kept flipping the flap of the low bar over the bar that it hangs from so there would be enough room for a boulder to go through. My question is, is that allowed and is there a penalty if a team does that and the human player rolls the ball hard enough that it would go over the ramp and under the low bar?

Mark McLeod 20-02-2016 20:17

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
Not legal.
Quote:

Originally Posted by G40-1
A ROBOT may not hold a Low Bar flap open for the purpose of allowing a DRIVE TEAM member to transfer BOULDERS into their opponent’s COURTYARD.
Violation: TECH FOUL per BOULDER



tindleroot 20-02-2016 20:18

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
I would ask that in the q and a. G40-1 doesn't really answer your question.

cjl2625 20-02-2016 20:19

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod (Post 1543344)
Not legal.


But this isn't holding the flap open. As I understand it, this is a robot causing the flap to get wrapped around the bar after going through it.

Mark McLeod 20-02-2016 20:30

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
I'd think that the flap would be open due to the actions of a robot (whatever those actions may have been).

cad321 20-02-2016 21:25

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
We too found this during out practice session today and we're wondering the exact same thing. I don't feel g40-1 is applicable here as we are not holding it open.

MrForbes 20-02-2016 21:52

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
How accurately did the flap match the real version of the low bar flap? If it was built as a team version, instead of the real field version, it probably behaves differently.

Sean4488 20-02-2016 21:57

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
This rule appears to be addressing just intentionally holding it open, not unintentionally flipping it. However, that does seem to be the spirit of the rule, if not what is technically written there. I think it would generally be safer just to avoid messing with it.

cad321 20-02-2016 22:18

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MrForbes (Post 1543415)
How accurately did the flap match the real version of the low bar flap? If it was built as a team version, instead of the real field version, it probably behaves differently.

I saw this happening in almost every Mach I watched of the merrimack off season which is an official first event with official field components.

rich2202 21-02-2016 09:33

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
IMHO, if it happens in normal game play, then no foul. If a robot sat there and wound it, then that is a different story.

If there were quick cycles, and the team used the low bar until it is wound, that is normal game play

Mark McLeod 21-02-2016 09:39

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
If the Refs judge it to be considered a normal, unavoidable condition of the field, then yea the teams might not be held liable.

MechEng83 21-02-2016 09:53

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
Not sure if the fabric is pinned to the bar on an official field, but at our week zero event, several teams caused the flip to happen, and the loop of fabric just went around the top bar and the weighted bar spun it so it fell back to the fully down.

Mark McLeod 21-02-2016 12:08

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
It was a loose fabric sleeve around the low bar on the real playing field at the Kickoff in Manchester, so when flipped over it just slipped and hung straight down again.

mjc49 21-02-2016 15:33

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod (Post 1543590)
If the Refs judge it to be considered a normal, unavoidable condition of the field, then yea the teams might not be held liable.

I agree though I think we'll ask our human players not to risk it until a precedence has been set. Tech Foul per Boulder is a stiff penalty if a ref has a different interpretation of the rule.

Captain_Kirch 21-02-2016 20:50

Re: Low Bar Flap
 
G40 "A ROBOT may not cause a BOULDER to move from the NEUTRAL ZONE into the opponent’s COURTYARD unless:
A. the ROBOT contacts the BOULDER within OUTER WORKS, and
B. the ROBOT completes its CROSSING (e.g. doesn’t completely back out of the OUTER WORKS into the NEUTRAL ZONE)
Violation: TECH FOUL per BOULDER"

Using the human player in that way would clearly be illegal under G40. No precedent, no gray area, it's illegal.

The bar wont flip over and get tangled because its a bar in sleeve design on the official fields.

G40-1 is not the rule that makes this illegal, it's an extension of the rule that makes this illegal.

Hopefully that puts a nice bow on this discussion. Good luck folks :)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi