Chief Delphi
Page 2 of 15 < 1 2 345678912 > Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Regional Competitions (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   2016 Alliance Selection Results (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144841)

MikLast 05-03-2016 23:03
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
PNW West Valley

1) 5920 4061 4120 (F)
2) 2147 5450 4082 4495 (W)
3) 4726 4980 2148 (SF)
4) 2944 1595 3712(SF)
5) 4513 4125 2149 (QF)
6) 6129 3220 2923 (QF)
7) 4692 4608 4132 (QF)
8) 3221 2926 5942 (QF)

5970, VIKbotics, went 11-1 in their quals, best at the event if you are wondering.

4082, Ranching Robots, broke in the 1st QF, and 4495, the Tigers, really stepped up as a backup, helping them clench the win.

No Declines.

Boltman 06-03-2016 09:54
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
[quote=engunneer;1551706]San Diego Regional
1. 5805 - 3882 - 3647
2. 3255 - 2485 - 1266
3. 4486 - 4984 - 1388
4. 5209 - 3128 - 3473
5. 3021 - 2102 - 2486
6. 2637 - 2443 - 1572
7. 5199 - 0399 - 2339
8. 1159 - 5137 - 0812


San Diego Regional
1. 5805 - 3882 - 3647 QF
2. 3255 - 2485 - 1266 SF
3. 4486 - 4984 - 1388 QF
4. 5209 - 3128 - 3473 QF
5. 3021 - 2102 - 2486 W
6. 2637 - 2443 - 1572 F
7. 5199 - 0399 - 2339 QF
8. 1159 - 5137 - 0812 SF

3021 declined 5805, and was ineligible for 3255 who tried to pick them too.
Rookie #1 seed!

Steve Kaneb 06-03-2016 12:28
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
Granite State District [NE]

1. 238, 78, 3609 (f)
2. 4905, 5687, 1721 (sf)
3. 131, 3958, 5422
4. 213, 885, 95 (sf)
5. 1729, 3467, 509
6. 88, 1831, 1786 (w)
7. 3323, 811, 2342
8. 1512, 138, 1517

No declines.

engunneer 06-03-2016 12:28
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
NE Granite State District
1. 0238 - 0078 - 3609
2. 4905 - 5687 - 1721
3. 0131 - 3958 - 5422
4. 0213 - 0885 - 0095
5. 1729 - 3467 - 0509
6. 0088 - 1831 - 1786
7. 3323 - 0811 - 2342
8. 1512 - 0138 - 1517

no declines

darn, Steve Kaneb beat me by a second

engunneer 06-03-2016 12:58
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
MAR Hatboro-Horsham District
1. 0025 - 0341 - 1807?
2. 0834 - 2607 - 2559
3. 6226 - 0708 - 2458
4. 1218 - 2590 - 5407
5. 1391 - 5113 - 2539
6. 4454 - 1640 - 2191
7. 2016 - 1647 - 0486
8. 2095 - 5457 - 2234

no declines

Stream died as they called the last team. Heard the syllable "8", and 1807 is the only team remaining with an "8" sound.

Brian Maher 06-03-2016 13:07
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
MAR Mount Olive District:
1) 0056 3637 0613 (QF)
2) 1923 0011 3142 (QF)
3) 0219 4653 0223 (QF)
4) 2554 1811 4361 (QF)
5) 0193 0041 4573 (F)
6) 0222 1403 1143 (SF)
7) 1257 5624 1676 (W)
8) 0075 0303 1279 (SF)

222 declined 2554

vikesrock777 06-03-2016 13:22
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
NE Waterbury District

1. 0558 - 0177 - 5686 (W)
2. 1099 - 2064 - 5746 (F)
3. 0230 - 0176 - 4055 (SF)
4. 3314 - 0228 - 3719 (SF)
5. 0348 - 0155 - 3525 (QF)
6. 3464 - 0999 - 1071 (QF)
7. 0236 - 1124 - 4557 (QF)
8. 2836 - 2170 - 1991 (QF)

no declines

Harshizzle 06-03-2016 13:35
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
NC Guilford County

1 3845 1533 3215 QF
2 2655 1501 1225 3331 F
3 435 4561 5727 QF
4 4290 3506 5511 W
5 234 3196 3680 QF
6 2642 2682 2640 SF
7 4935 5854 3336 QF
8 5679 3971 6004 SF

234 declined 435, and 5188 declined a team due to mechanical issues. It's a rough game!

Green Potato 06-03-2016 14:43
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
CHS Northern Virginia:

1. 1418 2363 2421 (W)
2. 1629 1731 5338 (F)
3. 4505 2534 2068 (QF)
4. 0888 0623 4472 (SF)
5. 0539 0612 2988 (QF)
6. 1719 3872 1123 (SF)
7. 4242 5587 3455 (QF)
8. 1111 1895 0619 (QF)

Reed501 06-03-2016 14:58
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tmeziere (Post 1551911)
We declined because we saw the opportunity to pick teams that work together better. We had worked with both Paradox (4th opr #2102) and coconuts (5th opr #2486) during qualifications. In our last qual. Match we captured the tower with coconuts and knew that we could do it during eliminations. Many mentors and students questioned our strategy but it paid off with a win.
Thanks to teams 2102 and 2486 for not following our example of declining.
Barely. ;)

Boltman 06-03-2016 15:02
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reed501 (Post 1552181)
Barely. ;)
Yup Catz alliance almost won..glad they saved you a spot in St Louis...good luck to all of you going from San Diego it was fun. You too agency best of luck and so happy Paradox made it too. Also glad W.A.R Lords got in with engineering and paid trip wow. Good luck to all.

juju_beans 06-03-2016 15:14
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by gingerschmidt (Post 1551788)
And how did 5805 rank so highly and get defeated by the number 8 alliance? :ahh:

Pretty much everything that could go wrong went wrong in the QF for us. We got ran over by our teammate and it hit one of our pipes and so we couldn't scale, we had our first auto failure and got caught under the low bar, we couldn't cycle balls fast enough, 3882's aiming cam broke in the second round... so much went wrong for us.

Boltman 06-03-2016 15:28
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by juju_beans (Post 1552191)
Pretty much everything that could go wrong went wrong in the QF for us. We got ran over by our teammate and it hit one of our pipes and so we couldn't scale, we had our first auto failure and got caught under the low bar, we couldn't cycle balls fast enough, 3882's aiming cam broke in the second round... so much went wrong for us.
Actually coming from being on #8 alliance this is my view. We were pretty much equal breacher to the rookie all star #1 ranked bot but way more versatile. We were partnered with a very efficient speedy crossing LG capable captain and an excellent HG shooter..we can pop in low goals and feed bots plus scale. We were the most well rounded bot in the eliminations and we had an awesome HG shooter and Awesome LG shooter by choice...that is a very tough combo to beat as your #1 alliance found out.

Had our shooter not jammed in SF the results would have been different there too. We had stuck issue in QF too but manage to overcome and the scale well that's two more HG's.

Alliance 1 was flawed (no disrespect at all) due to the fact the captain was "only" an awesome rookie breacher and you had no reliable HG shooters besides 3882 or scalers..that is why you lost. Just sayin'

You put both of our alliances on the field with no mechanical issues an we still will beat you most games due to the higher scoring ceiling of our alliance make-up.

In a perfect game for each alliance

Both teams breach+10.... both teams ferry balls to accurate shooters , both teams capture. BUT we scale.

3882 similar to our reliable HG 812 in the playoffs but 812 got fed more (I don't think 812 missed)
We were similar to the #1 seed and can shoot LG and/or feed and scale= 2 HG
Your were not as efficient as out alliance captain who could pop in LGs' consistently

Do the math and you will see I am correct, its no mystery why we won 2-0 if you compare bot for bot. We each had mechanical challenges.

Believe 3882 was on my HG pick list if we were alliance captain I think (as I told their team earlier) I had 3882 at 1 and agency at 2 and 812 at 3/4 with warlords

The real reason the #8 alliance won is we were ranked artificially low because we did not get credited for two RP in quals we should have been ranked about 11 instead of 19 so alliance 8 essentially got a #7-8ish captain level first choice by me talking to them them ahead of time and telling them they needed to pick us to have their best chance of going to St Louis at pick 8 and with the very next pic an awesome HG shooter my scouts identified..it worked beautifully.

That's the real reason why 8 beat 1 in two games. Comes down to us losing 2 RP making us available to alliance 8 why #1 lost in two straight games decisively which seems to never happen. 8 is not supposed to beat 1...the reason is RP's were not scored correctly skewing some rankings down and others artificially up. That is why top seeds got beat bad scoring in qualifications for some teams.

Hope week 2 goes better in terms of our shooter reliability/hardening and field crew accurate scoring to not skew rankings. I want us to be a captain in an amazingly tough world class field (that has not played yet) 812 and us have lots of practice and SF playoff experience and plans to compete ultra strong in CV from match 1 on. 585 should also improve also having a regional under their belt .Will be interesting in CV with the teams from SD coming to town. Bring it on can't wait to see what CV teams cooked up, I expect the best from many teams there.

Gutherie88 06-03-2016 15:38
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3175student17 (Post 1551776)
FIM Southfield :
1) 3604-3548-1188 (W)
2) 3668-1481-247 (QF)
3) 5843-3538-815 (QF)
4) 548-2960-5901 (SF)
5) 280-1025-3322 (QF)
6) 123-4680-573 (F)
7) 5167-94-3538 (SF)
8) 2832-3175-1701 (QF)
On the fourth alliance 5901 was replaced by 5014 due to a drivetrain issue; however, 5014 did not have functioning robot.

PerryParadox 06-03-2016 23:52
Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tmeziere (Post 1551911)
We declined because we saw the opportunity to pick teams that work together better. We had worked with both Paradox (4th opr #2102) and coconuts (5th opr #2486) during qualifications. In our last qual. Match we captured the tower with coconuts and knew that we could do it during eliminations. Many mentors and students questioned our strategy but it paid off with a win.
Thanks to teams 2102 and 2486 for not following our example of declining.
how could we say no


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23.
Page 2 of 15 < 1 2 345678912 > Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi