2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

With the first alliance selections of 2016 a few matches away, it's time for the CD community to start our annual record keeping.

FIRST has improved the layout and information available on their event results pages, but declines are not tracked and it's nice to have a backup source if FMS data is not available. Use this thread to post the full alliance selection results from each competition, noting the order of invitation and any declines.

Previous years' threads: 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Palmetto Regional
1. 0179 - 4451 - 1369 W
2. 1296 - 3824 - 4533 SF
3. 1758 - 1876 - 4073 QF
4. 2172 - 2252 - 0237 QF
5. 2200 - 0120 - 2386 SF
6. 4547 - 0343 - 2614 F
7. 4823 - 1102 - 2187 QF
8. 2393 - 3490 - 0283 QF

No declines.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

GTR CENTRAL

3683-4001-5039 W
1511-2609-4951 F
5699-3360-2809 SF
4946-188-4519 SF
772-2852-5589 QF
2706-6009-4069 QF
1325-1310-865 QF
5834-781-854 QF

No declines

"Perfect bracket" Red alliance always advanced.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Waterford District Event
1. 67-33-4003 W
2. 2137-1718-245 SF
3. 3655-1023-5048 F (1023 subbed for 5860 before finals -MARS)
4. 3667-201-4779 SF
5. 2075-308-1189 QF
6. 4810-3098-5436 QF
7. 51-6117-1250 QF
8. 5662-3773-3302 QF

No Declines

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Northern Lights:

1: 2987, 5172, 3267
2: 2501, 2512, 4786
3: 2883, 2502, 5232
4: 3082, 876, 3042
5: 3054, 4397, 5348
6: 6166, 4624, 3132
7: 4656, 3313, 877
8: 930, 5929, 4859

No declines (one "respectful acceptance" though)

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

PNW Auburn Mountainview District
1. 1983 - 3238 - 3786
2. 2046 - 2522 - 5937
3. 4173 - 4450 - 0488
4. 2907 - 4469 - 5588
5. 3663 - 3393 - 3223
6. 2557 - 4131 - 0360
7. 0949 - 1294 - 2906
8. 3787 - 1318 - 5803

no declines

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

San Diego Regional
1. 5805 - 3882 - 3647
2. 3255 - 2485 - 1266
3. 4486 - 4984 - 1388
4. 5209 - 3128 - 3473
5. 3021 - 2102 - 2486
6. 2637 - 2443 - 1572
7. 5199 - 0399 - 2339
8. 1159 - 5137 - 0812

3021 declined 5805, and was ineligible for 3255 who tried to pick them too.
Rookie #1 seed!

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Lake Superior:

1: 4009, 359, 6175
2: 5690, 2052, 2227
3: 3276, 4539, 5913
4: 3277, 2503, 1816
5: 3750, 3293, 4230
6: 2538, 2823, 4531
7: 2526, 3102, 4607
8: 4054, 2977, 2846

Don't think there were any declines, but I may be corrected on that.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

You are correct. No declines.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

1023 broke alliance 3 called in 5860 as their backup

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

FIM Southfield :
1) 3604-3548-1188 (W)
2) 3668-1481-247 (QF)
3) 5843-3538-815 (QF)
4) 548-2960-5901 (SF)
5) 280-1025-3322 (QF)
6) 123-4680-573 (F)
7) 5167-94-3538 (SF)
8) 2832-3175-1701 (QF)

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Why did 3021 decline? Where they not playing the ranking game during quals? And how did 5805 rank so highly and get defeated by the number 8 alliance? :ahh:

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

It seems like 3021 thought they would do better forming their own alliance, which can happen. It's also part of the meta-game - the game you play in eliminations is slightly different than the game played in quals. A robot good in one may not be good in the other.


I remember an event in 2009 where a rookie seeded #1 the event we were at, and picked 4 other alliance captains, and was declined each time. They didn't last through QF, but had the other effect that those captains couldn't pick each other either. (found it)

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

In fact, this was how 1678 largely won Curie in 2013. They were denied 4 times as #1 seed before 148 accepted (who was 9th). By forcing these robots to decline, they were able to keep 1310 (5th), 2056 (4th), 1717 (6th), and 359 (7th) from potentially pairing up with each other. None of those captains made it out of semifinals.

I don't remember there being too much of a fuss back then, because well... quite frankly, it was a brilliant move. 1678 saw the chance and took it. It helps that 1678 rightfully outplayed all the other alliances.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

We declined because we saw the opportunity to pick teams that work together better. We had worked with both Paradox (4th opr #2102) and coconuts (5th opr #2486) during qualifications. In our last qual. Match we captured the tower with coconuts and knew that we could do it during eliminations. Many mentors and students questioned our strategy but it paid off with a win.
Thanks to teams 2102 and 2486 for not following our example of declining.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

PNW West Valley

1) 5920 4061 4120 (F)
2) 2147 5450 4082 4495 (W)
3) 4726 4980 2148 (SF)
4) 2944 1595 3712(SF)
5) 4513 4125 2149 (QF)
6) 6129 3220 2923 (QF)
7) 4692 4608 4132 (QF)
8) 3221 2926 5942 (QF)

5970, VIKbotics, went 11-1 in their quals, best at the event if you are wondering.

4082, Ranching Robots, broke in the 1st QF, and 4495, the Tigers, really stepped up as a backup, helping them clench the win.

No Declines.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

[quote=engunneer;1551706]San Diego Regional
1. 5805 - 3882 - 3647
2. 3255 - 2485 - 1266
3. 4486 - 4984 - 1388
4. 5209 - 3128 - 3473
5. 3021 - 2102 - 2486
6. 2637 - 2443 - 1572
7. 5199 - 0399 - 2339
8. 1159 - 5137 - 0812


San Diego Regional
1. 5805 - 3882 - 3647 QF
2. 3255 - 2485 - 1266 SF
3. 4486 - 4984 - 1388 QF
4. 5209 - 3128 - 3473 QF
5. 3021 - 2102 - 2486 W
6. 2637 - 2443 - 1572 F
7. 5199 - 0399 - 2339 QF
8. 1159 - 5137 - 0812 SF

3021 declined 5805, and was ineligible for 3255 who tried to pick them too.
Rookie #1 seed!

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Granite State District [NE]

1. 238, 78, 3609 (f)
2. 4905, 5687, 1721 (sf)
3. 131, 3958, 5422
4. 213, 885, 95 (sf)
5. 1729, 3467, 509
6. 88, 1831, 1786 (w)
7. 3323, 811, 2342
8. 1512, 138, 1517

No declines.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

NE Granite State District
1. 0238 - 0078 - 3609
2. 4905 - 5687 - 1721
3. 0131 - 3958 - 5422
4. 0213 - 0885 - 0095
5. 1729 - 3467 - 0509
6. 0088 - 1831 - 1786
7. 3323 - 0811 - 2342
8. 1512 - 0138 - 1517

no declines

darn, Steve Kaneb beat me by a second

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

MAR Hatboro-Horsham District
1. 0025 - 0341 - 1807?
2. 0834 - 2607 - 2559
3. 6226 - 0708 - 2458
4. 1218 - 2590 - 5407
5. 1391 - 5113 - 2539
6. 4454 - 1640 - 2191
7. 2016 - 1647 - 0486
8. 2095 - 5457 - 2234

no declines

Stream died as they called the last team. Heard the syllable "8", and 1807 is the only team remaining with an "8" sound.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

MAR Mount Olive District:
1) 0056 3637 0613 (QF)
2) 1923 0011 3142 (QF)
3) 0219 4653 0223 (QF)
4) 2554 1811 4361 (QF)
5) 0193 0041 4573 (F)
6) 0222 1403 1143 (SF)
7) 1257 5624 1676 (W)
8) 0075 0303 1279 (SF)

222 declined 2554

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

NE Waterbury District

1. 0558 - 0177 - 5686 (W)
2. 1099 - 2064 - 5746 (F)
3. 0230 - 0176 - 4055 (SF)
4. 3314 - 0228 - 3719 (SF)
5. 0348 - 0155 - 3525 (QF)
6. 3464 - 0999 - 1071 (QF)
7. 0236 - 1124 - 4557 (QF)
8. 2836 - 2170 - 1991 (QF)

no declines

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

NC Guilford County

1 3845 1533 3215 QF
2 2655 1501 1225 3331 F
3 435 4561 5727 QF
4 4290 3506 5511 W
5 234 3196 3680 QF
6 2642 2682 2640 SF
7 4935 5854 3336 QF
8 5679 3971 6004 SF

234 declined 435, and 5188 declined a team due to mechanical issues. It's a rough game!

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

CHS Northern Virginia:

1. 1418 2363 2421 (W)
2. 1629 1731 5338 (F)
3. 4505 2534 2068 (QF)
4. 0888 0623 4472 (SF)
5. 0539 0612 2988 (QF)
6. 1719 3872 1123 (SF)
7. 4242 5587 3455 (QF)
8. 1111 1895 0619 (QF)

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Barely. ;)

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Yup Catz alliance almost won..glad they saved you a spot in St Louis...good luck to all of you going from San Diego it was fun. You too agency best of luck and so happy Paradox made it too. Also glad W.A.R Lords got in with engineering and paid trip wow. Good luck to all.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Pretty much everything that could go wrong went wrong in the QF for us. We got ran over by our teammate and it hit one of our pipes and so we couldn't scale, we had our first auto failure and got caught under the low bar, we couldn't cycle balls fast enough, 3882's aiming cam broke in the second round... so much went wrong for us.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Actually coming from being on #8 alliance this is my view. We were pretty much equal breacher to the rookie all star #1 ranked bot but way more versatile. We were partnered with a very efficient speedy crossing LG capable captain and an excellent HG shooter..we can pop in low goals and feed bots plus scale. We were the most well rounded bot in the eliminations and we had an awesome HG shooter and Awesome LG shooter by choice...that is a very tough combo to beat as your #1 alliance found out.

Had our shooter not jammed in SF the results would have been different there too. We had stuck issue in QF too but manage to overcome and the scale well that's two more HG's.

Alliance 1 was flawed (no disrespect at all) due to the fact the captain was "only" an awesome rookie breacher and you had no reliable HG shooters besides 3882 or scalers..that is why you lost. Just sayin'

You put both of our alliances on the field with no mechanical issues an we still will beat you most games due to the higher scoring ceiling of our alliance make-up.

In a perfect game for each alliance

Both teams breach+10.... both teams ferry balls to accurate shooters , both teams capture. BUT we scale.

3882 similar to our reliable HG 812 in the playoffs but 812 got fed more (I don't think 812 missed)
We were similar to the #1 seed and can shoot LG and/or feed and scale= 2 HG
Your were not as efficient as out alliance captain who could pop in LGs' consistently

Do the math and you will see I am correct, its no mystery why we won 2-0 if you compare bot for bot. We each had mechanical challenges.

Believe 3882 was on my HG pick list if we were alliance captain I think (as I told their team earlier) I had 3882 at 1 and agency at 2 and 812 at 3/4 with warlords

The real reason the #8 alliance won is we were ranked artificially low because we did not get credited for two RP in quals we should have been ranked about 11 instead of 19 so alliance 8 essentially got a #7-8ish captain level first choice by me talking to them them ahead of time and telling them they needed to pick us to have their best chance of going to St Louis at pick 8 and with the very next pic an awesome HG shooter my scouts identified..it worked beautifully.

That's the real reason why 8 beat 1 in two games. Comes down to us losing 2 RP making us available to alliance 8 why #1 lost in two straight games decisively which seems to never happen. 8 is not supposed to beat 1...the reason is RP's were not scored correctly skewing some rankings down and others artificially up. That is why top seeds got beat bad scoring in qualifications for some teams.

Hope week 2 goes better in terms of our shooter reliability/hardening and field crew accurate scoring to not skew rankings. I want us to be a captain in an amazingly tough world class field (that has not played yet) 812 and us have lots of practice and SF playoff experience and plans to compete ultra strong in CV from match 1 on. 585 should also improve also having a regional under their belt .Will be interesting in CV with the teams from SD coming to town. Bring it on can't wait to see what CV teams cooked up, I expect the best from many teams there.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

On the fourth alliance 5901 was replaced by 5014 due to a drivetrain issue; however, 5014 did not have functioning robot.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

how could we say no

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

FIM Standish

1) 1918-4377-5166 (W)
2) 3618-3770-1502 (SF)
3) 5448-6098-862 (F)
4) 107-3603-5247 (QF)
5) 6193-3602-5229 (SF)
6) 6121-5712-2619 (QF)
7) 5224-3570-5156 (QF)
8) 5175-5560-5525 (QF)

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Hate to break it to you but it was 234 that declined 435. 4290 didn't decline anyone. I was the one on the field who declined to 435 so I think I remember. ;)

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Perhaps you should have accepted?

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

It seemed that results followed the seeds. Winner first, etc. Congratulations to the winners, and especially thank you to 558 for helping us out with our pneumatics on Friday!

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

FIM Kettering #1

Captain - 1st Pick - 2nd Pick

1. 5150 - 5114 - 5234 (SF)
2. 6086 - 0894 - 5056 (QF)
3. 4384 - 0070 - 5084 (W)
4. 5460 - 3656 - 6081 (F)
5. 4376 - 5524 - 3568 (QF)
6. 5067 - 0001 - 1322 (QF)
7. 3535 - 5502 - 4994 (SF)
8. 5053 - 5660 - 5506 (QF)

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Rearranging order to reflect Captain - 1st pick - second pick and adding notes:

1. 2363 1418 2421 (W)
2. 1731 1629 5338 (F)
3. 2534 4505 2068 5243** (QF)
4. 0623* 0888 4472 2186*** (SF)
5. 0612 0539 2988 (QF)
6. 3872 1719 1123 (SF)
7. 5587 4242 3455 (QF)
8. 1895 1111 0619 (QF)

* 623 declined 2534
** 5243 replaced 2068 in QF4.2
*** 2186 replaced 4472 in SF1.2

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Sorry about that, I misread the information someone sent me. It's fixed now.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Pittsburgh:

1 1126 5406 1559
2 3260 48 6054
3 1023 3015 4050
4 3954 4991 156
5 2053 1507 4547
6 144 4467 128
7 5811 3138 340
8 5740 2614 3504

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

GTR EAST

1. 2056 - 0118 - 2634 - 0746 W
2. 1241 - 1114 - 2935 F
3. 2013 - 0610 - 5596 SF
4. 1325 - 1305 - 5807 SF
5. 4476 - 0296 - 5428 QF
6. 4976 - 4618 - 3117 QF
7. 5036 - 3710 - 1285 QF
8. 4783 - 5031 - 4343 QF

No declines

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Greater KC.
#1 : 1986 - 1775 - 4455 (W)
#2 : 5119 - 1939 - 1810
#3 : 1806 - 1987 - 935 (F)
#4 : 4959 - 1785 - 5730 (SF)
#5 : 1730 - 3528 - 2346
#6 : 1825 - 4522 - 1108
#7 : 3172 - 1997 - 1769 (SF)
#8 : 5098 - 2457 - 5801

1730 declined the 5119 Alliance.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

and for those interested in how they did;

1. 1983 - 3238 - 3786 (W)
2. 2046 - 2522 - 5937 (F)
3. 4173 - 4450 - 0488
4. 2907 - 4469 - 5588
5. 3663 - 3393 - 3223 (SF)
6. 2557 - 4131 - 0360 (SF)
7. 0949 - 1294 - 2906
8. 3787 - 1318 - 5803

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Kettering 2 (FiM)

1. 494 - 3534 - 6085 (F)
2. 5534 - 6086 - 4961 (SF)
3. 1684 - 4362 - 6073
4. 469 - 5046 - 5697 (SF)
5. 4130 - 2337 - 5260
6. 5926 - 3707 - 5203 (W)
7. 1506 - 6066 - 1243
8. 5238 - 5155 - 3539

No declines, no backup bots

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

St Louis

#1: 1675 - 2451 - 4330 W
#2: 1094 - 4931 - 4329 F
#3: 4356 - 4246 - 2408
#4: 2783 - 1658 - 2081 SF
#5: 1985 - 5326 - 4256
#6: 1288 - 3397 - 1706 SF
#7: 1208 - 5583 - 3284
#8: 1444 - 3792 - 4500

No declines.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Arizona West Regional:
1. 2122 125 498 (W)
2. 4183 842 192 (F)
3. 4499 1619 3009 (QF)
4. 1011 3250 991 (QF)
5. 1165 4146 2403 (S)
6. 1492 2486 1410 (S)
7. 2493 6221 4153 (QF)
8. 662 698 2996 (QF)

No declines,
269 brought in as backup for 2403 in Semis.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

St. Joseph (FiM)
1. 2767-3620-5069 (W)
2. 858-3546-3547 (SF)
3. 3452-3688-2405 (F)
4. 2474-4967-5622 (QF)
5. 6097-141-470 (SF)
6. 3875-904-4855 (QF)
7. 5256-288-2959 (QF)
8. 4325-5056-4956 (QF)

No declines.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Orlando Regional
1. 233-180-4592(W)
2. 4451-744-108(QF)
3. 79-1876-1369(SF)
4. 3880-386-86(SF)
5. 4769-21-5145(QF)
6. 1065-1592-4118(QF)
7. 2383-3556-2797(F)
8. 1902-5557-1557-4352(QF)

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Way to go Average Joes :)

The lead mentor on 5059 is a former colleague from many years ago.

Sorry I couldn't be there to see you guys win. I was there yesterday but didn't get to say hi, you were really busy reffing.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Sorry I missed you!

Yes, I was busy by the field most of Friday and Saturday. In the playoffs, I sat out during my team's matches. Biting my nails. :eek:

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

NE District - WPI Event

1) 4564-2648-1100
2) 0126-5813-2370
3) 1277-2877-5122
4) 1729-4048-0467
5) 1153-3146-0172
6) 0839-1768-0175
7) 0716-2168-2067
8) 4055-0190-4906

No declines.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

NE District - North Shore Event

1) 0319-1058-6161
2) 4905-3930-1699
3) 0133-4761-4474
4) 4929-5962-2713
5) 2084-2876-0246
6) 4909-0058-0501
7) 6201-5556-1474
8) 5752-1073-4311

133 declined 319

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

CHS District - Southwest Virginia Event

1 5279 1731 3258
2 3872 3274 3939
3 1413 1610 5950
4 2528 0401 0384
5 0346 1086 2534
6 3455 1262 0977
7 0422 0339 1599
8 3072 1598 0540

EDIT: No declines, thanks to Green Potato

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

No declines.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

CHS: Greater D.C.
( 1st, Cap, 2nd)

1. 836 1418 2912
2. 1389 4242 2900
3. 686 5587 4514
4. 1885 2537 4949
5. 4945 5115 5569
6. 2849 4638 3748
7. 3650 3283 2199
8. 449 2186 4456

No Declines.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

PCH District - Columbus Event:

1 1746 1648 3091 (SF)
2 2974 2415 4193 (F)
3 5332 1261 4240 (SF)
4 4468 4188 5074 (W)
5 5004 4026 3318 (QF)
6 3635 4701 5109 (QF)
7 5482 5828 4516 (QF)
8 6117 5293 3581 (QF)

No declines

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

CVR:

1. 1678 254 3970 (W)
2. 5137 973 2135 (SF)
3. 3482 1671 3303 (QF)
4. 701 2073 2761 (QF)
5. 6059 3495 649 (SF)
6. 1323 5817 8 5677 (F)
7. 4711 812 3045 (QF)
8. 5852 3859 5136 (QF)

1323 declined 6059
5677 was called as backup
All 7 teams on the winning/finalist alliances qualified for champs

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

2016 Arkansas Rock City Regional

1. 16, 3310, 6055 (W)
2. 3937, 3039, 4576 (F)
3. 3593, 3140, 34
4. 5454, 5045, 3160
5. 5006, 2338, 5568
6. 2359, 3507, 3959
7. 5002, 5437, 2333
8. 3931, 932, 3061

No declines

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

CHS: Greater D.C.

1. 1418 836 2912 4821 (Called in for SF 3 - The end) (W)
2. 4242 1389 2900 (SF)
3. 5587 686 4514 (F)
4. 2537 1885 4949 (SF)
5. 5115 4945 5569 (QF)
6. 4638 2849 3748 (QF)
7. 3283 3650 2199 (QF)
8. 2186 449 4456 5979 (Used for both QF's) (QF)

No Declines.
Formatting Fixed to be Captain First.
Congrats to teams 1418, 836, 2912, and 4821!

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

2016 Alamo Regional
1. 148 - 231 - 5726 W
2. 3005 - 624 - 3679 F
3. 2468 - 4063 - 5572 SF
4. 3999 - 3481 - 6155 QF
5. 1477 - 2158 - 2583 SF
6. 2805 - 4639 - 418 QF
7. 2848 - 457 - 1255 QF
8. 2789 - 5414 - 2881 QF
No declines

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

2016 Los Angeles Regional

1. 1197 - 987 - 5012 W
2. 294 - 330 - 1452 F
3. 2637 - 3309 - 5802 QF
4. 5510 - 696 - 207 SF
5. 4276 - 3476 - 1138 QF
6. 399 - 3863 - 5089 SF
7. 1148 - 4201 - 5124 QF
8. 4763 - 5851 - 6000 QF

no declines

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

2016 New York City Regional

1. 375-1796-806 (SF)
2. 369-5891-334 (SF)
3. 3419-578-3017 (F)
4. 5030-694-5016 (W)
5. 1635-1797-1726
6. 5806-2601-1155
7. 5781-333-335
8. 395-2869-1546

375 declined by 3419, 1635

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

PNW District - Glacier Peak Event

2976 replaced 4915 after Finals Match 2

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Just curious, was any alliance captain planning on picking 3072 before we got moved up to captains ourselves? I couldn't tell whether to be bummed or grateful to be moved up, because I wasn't sure if anyone would pick us if we weren't captains.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Australia regional
1. 3132 - 4613 - 6035
2. 5985 - 5584 - 1739
3. 5333 - 5663 - 5087
4. 6187 - 4739 - 5606
5. 5331 - 4729 - 6007
6. 5876 - 6024 - 4253
7. 4537 - 4774 - 6061
8. 5593 - 6050 - 5573

no declines, she said yes.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Australia regional


1. 3132 - 4613 - 6035-W
2. 5985 - 5584 - 1739-SF
3. 5333 - 5663 - 5087-F
4. 6187 - 4739 - 5606-QF
5. 5331 - 4729 - 6007-SF
6. 5876 - 6024 - 4253-QF
7. 4537 - 4774 - 6061-QF
8. 5593 - 6050 - 5573-QF

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

New York Tech Valley Regional
1. 359 - 3990 - 4508
2. 5254 - 20 - 229
3. 5236 - 2791 - 3624
4. 3419 - 5240 - 663
5. 48 - 1493 - 1551
6. 250 - 333 - 145
7. 358 - 3003 - 527
8. 4930 - 3044 - 4481

3419 and 48 declined 5236
no rookies in eliminations

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Central Illinois

1) 2481, 876, 2220 W
2) 4021, 111, 5822 SF
3) 1756, 1736, 4156 F
4) 1625, 3528, 4212 SF
5) 4646, 4143, 4096 QF
6) 2081, 5442, 4645 QF
7) 93, 2169, 4655 QF
8) 5847, 1094, 1732 QF

1625 declined 4021

Fun fact, 2481 picked 2220 as their 2nd pick last year too.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

4021 should have picked 1736 and had them decline as well. A little scorched earth.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Yep. They could of broke up the strong looking 3rd seeded alliance.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Another fun fact is that 2169 picked 93 as their second pick last year at Milwaukee. 93 has returned the favor!

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

True. During alliance selections for a second (before 1732 had been picked by the number 8 alliance) I thought 93 and 2169 would pick 1732 to recreate their alliance from Wisconsin last year... too bad though.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Edited for results.
1665 came in during our second semifinal match to replace 229, who was having drivetrain issues. They then proceeded to play some incredible defense, which is a huge part of the reason we got to finals.

All the robots in the finals, including backups, qualified for champs via Wildcards.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

PCH Albany

1 4188 1648 3344 F
2 1261 3329 5651 W
3 3581 4941 4235 SF
4 3635 4026 5734 SF
5 3091 5536 5828 QF
6 5848 4701 5293 QF
7 5840 4240 6139 QF
8 6177 1002 3600 QF

PCH Dalton

1 2974 4910 5594 W
2 4516 1771 1414 QF
3 5632 4189 4195 F
4 5132 5074 4193 QF
5 4749 1683 6023 SF
6 5608 5004 4080 QF
7 5482 832 1311 SF
8 1127 3694 3265 QF

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Incorrect winner for Albany. #1 lost to #2.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Utah Regional

1 2468 4334 3166 W
2 3021 329 4944 SF
3 287 3230 2478 QF
4 3225 3241 115 SF
5 3289 3245 1891 QF
6 1477 5933 3374 F
7 5489 3239 5974 QF
8 3243 4310 3288 QF

3021 was W in SD

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

NE District - UMass-Dartmouth Event

1) 0078-0176-5112 SF
2) 0095-0230-3182 F
3) 0181-1124-4151 SF
4) 0195-0155-3461 W
5) 0088-5000-5846 QF
6) 3236-4908-0348 QF
7) 0121-0178-1071 QF
8) 0246-3958-0069 QF

no declines.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

MAR Springside-Chestnut Hill

11 - 225 - 423 W
1391 - 708 - 2234 F
5404 - 1218 - 484 SF
193 - 4454 - 433 SF
2095 - 3974 - 709 QF
203 - 272 - 293 QF
4637 - 103 - 1712 QF
4342 - 219 - 3929 QF

Don't know if any declines

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

:'(

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

MORT vs MORT Beta in the semis :(

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

CHS - Northern Maryland
1. 4638 - 4945 - 3941
2. 1111 - 2068 - 1895
3. 1719 - 2849 - 888
4. 2537 - 5115 - 4456
5. 2988 - 3650 - 4099
6. 5243 - 2377 - 5338
7. 4464 - 4541 - 3748
8. 5841 - 3373 - 5936

no declines

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

MAR Seneca
1. 2590 - 365 - 1626
2. 1640 - 4573 - 6203
3. 5684 - 869 - 5666
4. 1089 - 102 - 4750
5. 2016 - 5113 - 4575
6. 87 - 6226 - 1279
7. 1647 - 5420 - 4954
8. 2600 - 5457 - 5938

4281 declined 87 due to drivetrain damage (thanks Hoover for catching it)

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

IN Walker Warren
1. 868 - 1024 - 1720
2. 4103 - 2771 - 4485
3. 4982 - 461 - 3180
4. 3176 - 3940 - 3487
5. 292 - 1747 - 3947
6. 2171 - 1741 - 5402
7. 234 - 447 - 1529
8. 4580 - 71 - 74

234 declined 3176

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

CHS Hampton Roads (vapor)

1. 2363 - 1885 - 5954
2. 1610 - 1262 - 1793
3. 5546 - 122 - 5804
4. 1137 - 449 - 6189
5. 3072 - 1413 - 1080
6. 3258 - 1829 - 5950
7. 2028 - 5724 - 3361
8. 3389 - 4286 - 6194

No declines

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

4281 declined seed 6 at Seneca due to a broken drive train which would take too long to repair

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

PNW Mount Vernon
1. 3238 - 3663 - 568
2. 1778 - 4911 - 3070
3. 4682 - 2907 - 3681
4. 4205 - 2928 - 4077
5. 3826 - 492 - 3268
6. 4089 - 5495 - 4915
7. 2903 - 1294 - 4180
8. 4683 - 948 - 3574

no declines

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

fixed above, thanks. I was logging picks from two events at once and didn't hear that one. If I recall, they actually declined in the second round, right?

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Yes. Then 1279 was picked. They could have accepted but then it would have burned the backup coupon. They should get the gp or team spirit award or some mention at least

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Correct. 2729 also declined in the second round, I think it was the #4 alliance.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

PNW Ellensburg

1 3711 1318 2926 (f)
2 1983 4061 2149 (w)
3 4450 2147 4495 (qf)
4 1258 2557 3586 (sf)
5 5920 5942 488 (qf)
6 4726 4980 4125 (sf)
7 2923 1595 3588 (qf)
8 2930 5803 4513 (qf)


4450 declined 3711.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Added results

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Added results

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Center Line:

1) 1481-0123-5756 (SF)
2) 3098-0503-5915 (F)
3) 5567-1189-5555 (SF)
4) 1701-5053-2048 (W)
5) 4680-0818-3175 (QF)
6) 0910-0245-5623 (QF)
7) 3632-0815-0280 (QF)
8) 5478-0453-2673 (QF)

no declines

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Lol. Sometimes you're better off accepting the invitation.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

or maybe, at this particular time and place, they were more interested in the experience of being an alliance captain.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Week 2

NC District Wake County

1. 4935 - 2642 -3661 (W)
2. 435 - 2059 - 5544 (F)
3. 3215 - 2682 - 6003 (QF)
4. 5518 - 3459 - 4816 (SF)
5. 4795 - 587 - 5190 (QF)
6. 6215 - 900 - 5607 (SF)
7. 3331 - 3737 - 5160 (QF)
8. 3336 - 5919 - 4828 (QF)

No declines


Week 3

NC District UNC Asheville

1. 2655 - 238 - 3680 (W)
2. 4290 - 2059 - 3845 (QF)
3. 5160 - 1533 - 3229 (SF)
4. 587 - 3506 - 3971 (SF)
5. 4828 - 5854 - 5446 (QF)
6. 4935 - 3196 - 5727 (QF)
7. 3402 - 422 - 5679 (F)
8. 4767 - 2640 - 1225 (QF)

I believe there was a decline by 587.

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
mfw

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Does anyone know why 2729 declined.

As someone from 587 we did decline 4290 because they were 2nd seed and with 24 teams would have a weaker team because of the third pick. We went on to be in an alliance with yeti and Kai orbus and went to semi finials (would have gone to finals if we didn't lose coms on the field)

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Well, they had told us that they were going to decline us. We used that to our own strategic advantage and chose them so Skunk Works 1983, would not pick them. It was a great competition!

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

Did they mention why?

Re: 2016 Alliance Selection Results
 

TBA show you losing 2/2 SF matches. You lose com both matches? I would have said something to the ref and/or used a time-out to diagnose the problem after the first failure.

I have no problem with you picking them, or them declining you for that matter (it just obviously didn't work out for them).