![]() |
Re: #25 Chain
Quote:
% = ((M- (S*P)) / (S*P) * 100 M = the length of a number of links measured S = the number of links measured P = Pitch Green, Robert E. et al. (eds) (1996), Machinery's Handbook (25 ed.), New York, NY, USA: Industrial Press, ISBN 978-0-8311-2575-2. |
Re: #25 Chain
Quote:
Basically, I would love to spend a day with #25 and #35 and a big hydraulic tensile testing machine. |
Re: #25 Chain
Chain doesn't stop stretching (roller axes don't stop wearing), but it does plateau after a little bit. Teams have tried pre-stretching chain before, but you want to actually run the chain while doing this, not just pulling on it or whatever, since chain stretch is really the pins wearing down. Not as simple as linear force + time. There's also some sprocket wear that can be a factor in chain tension.
|
Re: #25 Chain
We abused #25 chains and sprockets this season. During design and assembly, all looked good and worked smoothly.
The 8 wheel cantilever axle design was extremely hard on the bearings and the 2x1x1/8 aluminum chassis tubes. After a day of qualifying at Alamo, the axles had excessive axial and lateral clearance. The bearings were no longer tightly fitting in the chassis tubes, causing a wee bit of chain/sprocket alignment error. We ended up letting our alliance down in the semifinals as we had destroyed chains and sprockets. (sorry about that) The first step towards a fix was to replace the C-clip axle retention design with an end bolt design. This allowed for a preload on the bearings, keeping the axles parallel to each other and the sprockets aligned nicely. We also started replacing all of the chains and sprockets after qualifying. Future drive systems will not need this kind of maintenance. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi