Chief Delphi
Page 5 of 6 < 1234 5 6 >
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   Rules/Strategy (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not? (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=145216)

EricH 15-03-2016 20:18
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpha Beta (Post 1557558)
Why do so many top teams end up going low?

1. Powerhouses weren't going to blame the lack of a breach on a random alliance partners getting irrevocably stuck on a defense. They assumed it would happen and wanted to make sure they could still do the other 4. (By themselves if necessary.)
2. Class C defenses are a time suck. In eliminations top alliances are still skipping them, making low bar a faster option if capable.
One of the two non-low-bar captains made a pretty decent living doing a Class C in AUTO(and in teleop). And showed Class A ability in elims, too.

1197 designed to be capable of handling anything that isn't low bar. Part of that was figuring out that with everybody else going low, we didn't need to!

BenjiSG 15-03-2016 21:54
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
 
Team 4564 Orange Chaos was the first seed alliance captain at the WPI NE District Qualifier, and they were low bar-capable sure enough.

Boltman 16-03-2016 00:41
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
 
CVR...1678 is low bar limbo bot as captain #1

kannr0604 20-03-2016 11:37
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
 
#7 seed/winner and alliance captain 839 at NE WPI District event is low bar, and the first seeded was 4564 Orange Chaos and they were low bar as well and made it to Semi-finals.

CalTran 20-03-2016 11:40
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
 
2481 went an astounding sixteen match undefeated streak without ever going under the low bar at Illinois

Anthony Galea 20-03-2016 12:21
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
 
1481 at Center Line was low-bar capable

M217 20-03-2016 16:02
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
 
359 was low-bar capable at Tech Valley, although they didn't really use it so much. Incidentally, so were, I believe, all of the top 8 seeded machines.

Cam877 20-03-2016 18:02
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
 
As for MAR this week, both 11(Chestnut hill) and 2590(Seneca) are both low bar capable.

mmorauske 20-03-2016 20:03
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
 
FIM St Joseph event. #1 seed 2767 was low bar capable and their first pick, #2 seed 3620 was as well.

yonip 21-03-2016 11:46
CHS Hampton Roads event #1 seed 2363 was low bar capable, I believe

Joe Ross 27-03-2016 17:48
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
 
973 was #2 seed at Ventura, and is a tall robot. They were only 5 autonomous points from being #1 seed. #1 seed was low bar.

Hikel team 319 27-03-2016 20:17
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
 
319 is a low bar bot. They were number one seed and event winner at both North Shore and UNH District events.

Woolly 27-03-2016 20:36
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
 
1806 has low bar capability and was the #1 seed and winner at Oklahoma.

JedG 27-03-2016 20:41
Re: First seed alliance captain: Low Bar or not?
 
4039, the number one seed at Buckeye was a low bar bot.

Joe Ross 02-04-2016 17:40
3476 is not low bar capable and was first seed alliance captain at Orange County.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:41.
Page 5 of 6 < 1234 5 6 >
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi