![]() |
Re: KISS
Quote:
|
Re: KISS
Quote:
1. 179 Children of The Swamp 56.39 Palmetto 2. 3683 Team Dave 54.69 Greater Toronto Central 3. 5172 Gators 53.10 Northern Lights 4. 359 Hawaiian Kids 51.98 Lake Superior 5. 876 Thunder Robotics 49.42 Northern Lights. The top four are all over 50, all qualified for championships, and all were on the number 1 seed alliance. |
Re: KISS
Quote:
|
Re: KISS
This weekend's results were unsurprising, and mirrors results from other years. In 2012, most week 1 events were won by teams that scored in the 2 point goal and consistently got double balances. By the end of the season you couldn't win any respectable event with high goal capability and often with triple balances.
This game is going to change dramatically over the weeks, and I'm very excited to see it do so. Congratulations to the teams mentioned who have been getting far without the high goal and without climbing. You're an inspiration to strategic minds the world over. But keep improving. No alliance (in my opinion) is going to win a regional past week 4 without high goal scoring, and no alliance (in my opinion) is going to win a world championship without scaling. Stronghold is a strategic game, for sure, but strategy will get you so far. |
Re: KISS
Quote:
However, we recognize that our shooting cycle time was not ideal and will be working hard to have that improved for our next regional. Also, autonomous. There was a clear progression of improvements to team's autonomous modes throughout the weekend. Those are only going to get better. |
Re: KISS
Quote:
I've been saying it over the last couple of weeks. Scaling has been relatively rare so far but it's inevitably going to become the one aspect of the game that determines Einstein. Think the Can-Grabbers last year. |
Re: KISS
Quote:
|
Re: KISS
Quote:
|
Re: KISS
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:16. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi