2016 World High Score
 

Week .5 and 1 were a blast and I bet you guys are all pushing for that world high score. As of Week .5 the high score was 180 points by 4451,179, and 1369. Week 1 the high score is tied for 185 by 5172, 2987, and 3267 at the Northern Lights Regional and by 33, 67, and 4003 at the FIM District. Congrats to both alliances.
I made this thread not only to update you guys on the current high scores but to leave this to others to update as the weeks go on. If there is a higher score out there that I did not mention feel free to post it in this thread. Good Luck to teams in the upcoming weeks and great job to those who qualified for the world championship in St. Louis.

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

It would be helpful to know the top score with and without penalties. Can make a big difference (both 185s were 165 without penalties)

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

I know a 170 was scored no penalties at northern lights by 2883, 2502, and 5232. I am not sure if there has been a higher one than that.

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

185 Is the high score.


Match-Event............................................. ..........................Team1...Team2...Team3... ....SCORE
Semis 1 Match 2$@#2016 Palmetto Regional.......................................... ..4451....179.....1369........180
Quarters 2 Match 3$@#2016 San Diego Regional........................................21 02....3021....2486........155
Finals 1$@#2016 Lake Superior Regional.......................................... ....359.....4009....6175........163
Semis 1 Match 1$@#2016 Northern Lights Regional.....................................5172. ...2987....3267........185
Quarters 2 Match 1$@#2016 Greater Toronto Central Regional..........................188.....4946.... 4519........161
Quarters 3 Match 3$@#2016 FIM District - Kettering University Event #1..............5502....3535....4994........160
Semis 2 Match 1$@#2016 FIM District - Southfield Event..............................4680....123.... .573.........148
Quarters 1 Match 3$@#2016 FIM District - Standish-Sterling Event....................4377....1918....5166..... ...147
Quarters 1 Match 2$@#2016 FIM District - Waterford Event............................33......67......4 003........185
Semis 1 Match 2$@#2016 PNW District - Auburn Mountainview Event.....................3238....1983....3786.... ....130
Quarters 4 Match 1$@#2016 PNW District - West Valley Event..........................4980....4726....214 8........130
Finals 2$@#2016 NE District - Waterbury Event.......................................177... ..558.....5686........141
Quarters 2 Match 2$@#2016 NC District - Guilford County Event.......................3506....4290....5511.. ......121
Quarters 1 Match 2$@#2016 NE District - Granite State Event.........................78......238.....3609 ........150
Semis 2 Match 1$@#2016 MAR District - Mt. Olive Event...............................1403....222... ..1143........162
Semis 1 Match 2$@#2016 MAR District - Hatboro-Horsham Event.........................2590....1218....5407 ........133
Semis 1 Match 2$@#2016 CHS District - Northern Virginia Event.......................1418....2363....2421.. ......164

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

The top score that I see in all regionals has been 5172, 2987, and 3267 in semi finals match 2. It was 175 without fouls.

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

So whether 5172, 2987, and 3267 are tied for the high score depends on if it includes fouls?? Can the high score include fouls or not? Is it by 'law' that the high score can or can't include fouls or is it just personal opinion whether it should or not?

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

Considering the high score is meaningless (the true "best matches" will include some tight defense), I don't see why fouls wouldn't count

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

It is also important to note that high scores in qualification matches are more impressive than in eliminations since there are 40 extra bonus points possible in eliminations that are not available on qualifications.

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

Sometimes the best matches involves a high score.

Many long time FRC historians consider this match, 2001 - 710 point Perfect Score match, to be the Greatest FRC in-match achievement ever. Either way its a metric by which all other matches are measured by.

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

It's all for fun, so I don't see why we can't mention both.

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

Here are some others from SD...That are above minimum 121 in above list
Quarters 1 Match 1 3882 5805 3647 5137 1159 812 102 123
Quarters 4 Match 2 4984 4486 1388 2443 2637 1572 135 137
Quarters 4 Match 3 4984 4486 1388 2443 2637 1572 99 124
Semis 1 Match 1 5137 1159 812 2102 3021 2486 109 146
Semis 1 Match 2 5137 1159 812 2102 3021 2486 101 135
Semis 2 Match 1 2485 3255 1266 2443 2637 1572 109 124

Not a good day for red alliances until the end

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

Fouls should count.
If a robot is hitting you preventing you from making a shot you would otherwise make, they why not?
There were multiple non-calls which were shown on webcasts of various regionals which could affect scores.
As mentioned earlier, fouls/defense are part of the game, and should count.

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

To clarify, I also agree that in general fouls are absolutely part of the game and are valid when comparing scores. You can just learn more about a specific match by looking at foul points (egregious errors by opposing alliance, lots of defense, etc.)

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

How is that match considered Perfect? It seems like more small balls could have been scored from the field, and the time multiplier wasn't maxed out (>=90 seconds remaining)

I remember some rounds from Ultimate Ascent where every disc was scored in the high goals (between both teams), autonomous mode scoring effectively maxed out, and climbing achieved, which seems closer to perfection that the match above

Re: 2016 World High Score
 

I agree that fouls should count in high score.

Foul calls influence game play -- that is why the GDC made the rules the way they are.

One possible example: GTR Central teams were called for more fouls per match than at any other event to date. Perhaps this influenced teams to play less defense, run faster cycles, score more, and earn more breach and capture RPs. Perhaps this is the way the GDC envisioned game play in Stronghold.

----
Link to some data.