![]() |
Boulders Over Position 2
CHS Hampton Roads, Finals 2 was just uploaded to YouTube (thanks Triple Helix :D).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeguT-c1nd4 In it, our human player scores 2 boulders over position 2's Ramparts. If timing were slightly better, there probably would have been three over Position 2. In the video, boulders are at the top of the screen from the left side. Does anyone else have video of this happening with Ramparts or other defenses? It was a surprising thing to be able to do in a live match, and it's not exactly something the average alliance expects to be a consideration when selecting defenses. |
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
Quote:
Nonetheless, an impressive feat to behold. Curving the Boulder isn't the easiest thing to do. Good job on the technique! |
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
Did the ref give a Tech Foul for it? The bottom right ref certainly waves a red flag right after it happened.
Cool to see it happen in a live match. |
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
Quote:
|
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
Correct, that was a tech foul for [G27].
The strategy overall is very tricky for the HP to pull off - if it glances off of a robot then it's a tech foul. We came very close to one because the HP had to push it out quickly due to the incoming scores - so he didn't notice 2363's bot right there. We also told the head ref we would try this strategy in that match so the refs wouldn't automatically presume the robots were kicking them across. I also just realized we selected Ramparts for Position 2 that match... whoops... |
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
We do have some video of our human player doing this over the rock wall, moat, ramparts, rough terrain, and even the Cheval. It takes practice but it works well.
At one point he was 3 inches from the goal. Look at the timer around 67 seconds left (match timer not video time) and you can see that boulder coming agonizingly close to the goal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MRt...ature=youtu.be We discussed the rules about it on this thread as well: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=145485 |
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
Quote:
|
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MRt...ature=youtu.be |
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
This was a strategy my team (228) planned to implement at our Week 1 competition, and we tried to keep it reasonably quiet, but from the very first matches of the day teams were insisting on putting Category A / C defenses in Position 2 to block this strategy. I assumed that this was a well known strategy throughout FRC considering how instantly ubiquitous this defensive scheme was, but I guess some isolated events lack teams who tried it.
|
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
Teams that don't put the A/C obstacle in position 2 get what's coming to them...
Unless the audience selection is an A/C and the other alliance has a robot that can 100% dead reckon the high goal in auto from position 4... This game is fun. |
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
Quote:
|
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
When I first brought this up with my group, they told me it was impossible to do, that you might only see it happening on accident. I'm glad to see that the CD community knows that this is a legitimate strategy and that it should be defended against as so.
|
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
Had a thought last night - is it legal for a robot to hold the drawbridge or sally port open in order to allow balls to pass through in position 2?
Is it legal to hold the portcullis open? It seems to me like it is. Perhaps there is no good option... |
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
Quote:
|
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
The Head Referee at Alamo deemed this action illegal, while referencing the rulings made at previous competitions regarding rolling a boulder under the low bar when it had no fabric.
|
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
Quote:
|
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
Q&A #958 will hopefully address multiple aspects of this strategy.
|
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
G40: A ROBOT may not cause a BOULDER to move from the NEUTRAL ZONE into the opponent’s COURTYARD unless:
A. the ROBOT contacts the BOULDER within OUTER WORKS, and B. the ROBOT completes its CROSSING (e.g. doesn’t completely back out of the OUTER WORKS into the NEUTRAL ZONE) Or they could simply change the G40 rule from a ROBOT to an ALLIANCE. One simple word. Basically the robots can still hold open every defense that is not the low far flap from my interpretation. They did not anticipate good bowlers as human players getting the ball over the second and third defenses. I have seen videos where a human player rolled a ball under the low bar fabric on accident as a robot on the opposing alliance passes under it. An opposing alliance's robot is not clarified in that ruling and they did not get a foul. Honestly if a human player can get their timing down they deserve to get the ball over because it is not like any of that is easy. Is it illegal to have impeccable timing?:yikes: |
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
So is it illegal to by the hp's own power roll a boulder under the low bar. Assuming no robot helped the boulder get over the defense?
|
Re: Boulders Over Position 2
I did this in a practice match at Buckeye, but that was the only time the ramparts were in position 2. I didn't bother to try any other time... the situation was too high risk. I didn't want to clog up anything if I missed.
Does anyone have any suggestions for a powerful throw while still angling it? Or do you prefer to put a spin on it and how so? I've been experimenting, but I’m just wondering what some people have done to get it. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi