Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

Wiscosin just passed a bill that will throw money at teams and I'm fearful that Wiscosin will have this same problem. Especially because the RPC in Wiscosin has the flawed* view that we need more teams before we switch to districts.

*North Carolina and Indiana has proved this thought false.

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

Well why are you doing that then?

The state of Minnesota does not have grants to new teams. At least not that I've heard of. I know that Michigan and Iowa give (or gave) grants to teams but if Minnesota doesn't.

I go to MNFIRST.org and I see a button to donate, but I don't see any "free money for teams" verbiage.

So I ask again, explain how Minnesota is encouraging growth for the sake of growth?

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

The small single state district format is also in GA. I assume it is working there as well. I will attest to the primary reason that the single state district systems work is because they have a very great backbone of teams that pulls it all together. NC had a lot of teams volunteer to pull triple duty so they could get the system to work the way they wanted. We were VERY impressed and felt very welcomed in North Carolina because they have a lot of people that "get it".

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

My old team (2220) was started because somebody in our city saw that a company was offering grants to start an FRC team. He basically said he'd start one at Eagan High School and then told the school administration they had a new FRC team. From what I've heard of the team's early years, it's somewhat impressive that the team even came back for a second year, much less have gone on to become the impressive team they are now.

The team I currently mentor, 2667, exists because of a single sponsor. Despite having almost no communication with them last year and no idea that they planned to continue sponsoring the team (something that we tried very hard to correct), they paid for our fee this year. We did not know if we would be able to compete until that check came, completely unexpectedly, in the mail.

These are not isolated cases. There is a pattern here. Many teams here are constantly on the edge of disappearing, and don't have the resources or knowledge to effectively teach or inspire students.

Yesterday, I was talking with 2220's old faculty adviser, and he told me that going to the Wisconsin regional back in 2007 is the only reason the team came back for another season. I have to imagine that there are a number of teams that are perpetually in that situation.

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

Perhaps he's referencing the grant money available from FIRST or somewhere else.

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

I can attest to much of what Eric and Evan have said. Only in the last year or two have we seen a level of performance across the board where most teams can participate meaningfully in each match, and this is great to see. But for many years, there was a large swathe of teams (at times including 2175) that struggled to perform the basic tasks of the game, and yes, even do the bare minimum by passing inspection and submitting for awards.

I struggle to say it's a disservice (Evan only said "almost") to the teams and students. Surely the something we've had and that has now matured a little more is better than nothing. There is certainly some benefit to the students, though it may not be the best use of resources to start large numbers of team with the generous donations of corporations without ensuring local connections that help the team succeed with that money. Any successful team would agree, it takes more than $5000 in cash to do well, and extensive mentor and sponsor support on a personal level are key as well.

Perhaps this is also true for volunteer supply (event venues, etc.); I can imagine that a higher level of competition and community connection among teams would lead to higher levels of volunteer involvement and more opportunities to make this district transition, which many of us feel is several years overdue.

The state of WI offering financial support for new teams is fantastic, and should not be turned down. Of course this will benefit students, and isn't just "growth for the sake of growth." But it will take more than just covering the registration fee for a team to survive and do well, and to ensure that WI's growth does not see the same growing pains MN has.

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

My point being that it's not a Minnesota thing. Minnesota has had phenomenal growth the past few years, greater than the rest of the US, but it's not because the state is throwing money at creating teams.

As I said upthread, the growth is organic, not because one major entity is pushing a grow at any cost strategy.

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

Not the state. The Fortune 500 companies and other generous corporate sponsors in the Twin Cities and throughout the state. This is nothing but commendable on the sponsors' parts, and has also been a major focus of the RPC since the beginning (connecting these sponsors and their grant money with new teams). We've seen enormous benefits and phenomenal growth. But many teams have lacked the mentor support and mature infrastructure to do well. It's not a novel idea that growing very very quickly will have unintended side effects and shortcomings.

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

I see your point. It would be interesting to know why growth has exploded in MN if it weren't from some cash infusion.

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

Are you seriously asking why a WFFA winner who has spent almost ten years in FIRST as a student and mentor, who is currently one of the FIRST senior mentors in Minnesota, is trying to help teams as best as he can? It is literally his job to help teams, but he's here since well before you've been involved, and the impact Evan has had on teams across the state, but especially in the Twin Cities area, is nothing short of incredible. The efforts he continuously goes to in order to help teams in this state across every program are incredible.

Edit: If you're talking about "why are these teams started with $5000 and no support", I really don't know, other than guessing that FIRST's push for growth made this seem like the logical step forward to those in charge here. While I appreciate the amount of effort to connect these teams to money, you need a LOT more than money to run an effective FRC team.

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

Erik,
I have to disagree. The level of rookie team robots and their ability to pass inspection is higher in Minnesota then in almost any other region that I attend. Australia is also doing what Minnesota does, and has many training exercises for rookie and veteran teams alike. Australia has similar issues that Minnesota has but on a much larger scale. If you want to look at small teams consider an Australian outback team from a town of 150 people, that has a K-12 school with 18 students.
Minnesota is not the only region that lacks engineering support. Wave is very lucky that they have good engineering support but take a look at other teams in your state. They make some pretty great robots too. Compared to your team, they have a fraction of the engineers.
It is not possible to measure inspiration. We may never know if our students succeed because we may not hear from them. But I know in my heart that we are inspiring small, struggling teams as well as large teams. My inspiration in Duluth this year came from a small team from Grand Marais. Those students faced some serious issues when they opened the bag. We worked with them and made suggestions and everyone of their team jumped in and took care of the robot. They did a spectacular job and had a functioning robot that anyone would have liked to ally with.
If we know this program is having that kind of an effect on students, how can growth be bad? Why would anyone stand in the way of giving a rural team the opportunity to join something that big city teams have been enjoying? How can we deny FRC, FTC or FLL to a student simply because they live in a small town, or have to travel 140 km through the outback to school or have no engineering support? This is my 21st season and I have seen the effect on students for a long time. I have met students who experienced their first stay in a hotel or their first travel away from their hometown going to a FIRST event. I have met students who were given the choice of joining a team or going to jail. I have seen students who never considered anything but work after high school (if they graduated at all), go on to full ride scholarship at a good university. They are the lucky ones, I can't deny that chance to anyone.

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

Hello all,

I am currently in the process of translating this flyer in Spanish (and also adding more background information on the regional system for parents), and was wondering if anyone would be interested in perhaps translating it into another language. :D

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

Two points

1) if people are going to copy this, let's improve the sentence at the bottom of the flyer. "Transition" is a (3-syllable) noun, not a verb. In English, you don't change nouns into gerunds by appending "ing"; instead nouns simply stay nouns. I suggest picking a nice simple verb like "switch", "change", or "move" to use in the sentence at the bottom of the flyer.

2) If this flyer is intended to sell folks, who don't understand the bigger picture, on the what's-in-it-for-me aspects of competing within a District, it's fine. If the flyer is supposed to deliver a complete and accurate picture of all the changes involved in a switch from Regionals to a District, it is obviously, hopelessly one-sided and incomplete - incomplete to the point of being misleading.

I suggest that anyone thinking of reusing the flyer should think twice before laying a foundation that only emphasizes assumed benefits, and leaves out the costs of paying the pipers.

Blake
PS: I didn't do a grammar check on the entire flyer, but if the flyer is going to be reused, someone well-qualified should do one. If users can't find a well-qualified editor (then they aren't looking very hard), they can ask me to take the time for a thorough grammar review.

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

Hi,
Jess and I are both communication majors. We are also having many people peer-review the flyers (in both languages), and will be taking your considerations into account.

The Spanish flyer is specifically going to parents and family members that have students in FIRST, as it is hard to explain the district model without explaining the regional model - both will be covered in the flyer. This flyer was given out to teams and is supposed to be "...intended to sell folks, who don't understand the bigger picture, on the what's-in-it-for-me aspects of competing within a District" as you said.

Re: pic: Districts in Minnesota Flyer
 

Contact your regional planning committee and ask how you can get involved in transcendentalizing to the district system.

Contact your regional planning committee and ask how you can get involved in metamorphosing to the district system.

Contact your regional planning committee and ask how you can get involved in transmogrifying to the district system.

Contact your regional planning committee and ask how you can get involved in permuting to the district system.