![]() |
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
My assumption is that the early poking around near the fire was an attempt to find and hit the main breaker, which is usually the first line of defense before they go to the extinguishers. Even when clearly labelled, the smoke can make it really hard to see the breaker. Blowing on the flames, however, was probably not the best plan.
Later, they popped the cover to make it easier to get the fire extinguisher onto the fire. |
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
Quote:
It was stated that the fire was caused by a battery short with a live chassis. If a robot is on fire, 9 times out of 10 it will be because of a battery short or electrical fault. When a high amperage electrical circuit shorts, touching the metal chassis of the robot is a good way to become less alive. |
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
Quote:
It's quite apparent that extinguisher was still in case 8. I bet all the FTAs get an email this week. |
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
Quote:
|
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
Quote:
|
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
Quote:
I'd also call dry chemical much more common. C02 extinguishers are not typically found at your big box home store. I've never actually seen a CO2 unit in a pit at an FRC event. I'm sure some teams have them, but dry chemical is pretty much what everyone has. |
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
Quote:
Mind you there's plenty of other dangers from the battery, but they're all the fire, explosion, direct-short causing a welding arc sort. TL;DR: The robot battery (and your car battery[2]) aren't going to electrocute you unless you stab a positive and negative wire from them into your heart. In which case you have plenty of other problems besides. [1]I have before. It was weird. [2]Had a dead battery once in college and got a jump from a doctor. He gave me the same electrocution warning. And he should know, because he's a doctor. I didn't argue because I wanted to get home. |
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
If there was a short with the frame, does this mean the frame isolation test during inspection was not done?
Or would this happen even if the frame isolation test passed? |
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
Quote:
[1]I do a lot of work with electrical systems. Also got shocked by a 240 ~3-6A wall socket (for the second time) a few years ago, less than a fun experience. |
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
Quote:
|
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
Quote:
Disclaimer: I didn't do any events in Michigan this year, so it may have changed. Quote:
|
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
Quote:
|
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
Quote:
The reason we do the frame isolation test is to ensure that it takes two faults to cause a problem, not just one. Two faults obviously can still happen, but it's half as likely to happen as having one fault. |
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
Quote:
|
Re: Fire at Michigan State Champs
Quote:
Before using your extingisher on an electrical fire, you want to remove the inigtion source. Powdered fire extinguisher are messy. Never my first choice when other options are present. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi