![]() |
Re: If YOU were the GDC...
Quote:
It has been two consecutive years where 3 robots are required to score some points. I would just assume that next year will be similar. Let's see how long it takes teams to figure out that they should be helping other teams during the preseason. |
Re: If YOU were the GDC...
Quote:
This would have led to a lot more diverse autonomous routines. |
Re: If YOU were the GDC...
Quote:
We apologized and I personally explained what happened to your drive team. It was a misjudgement from our side I didn't react fast enough and you seem to be trying to inflame the situation. The penalty was valid and we do not contest we messed up. It effected us severely in our rankings. We are sorry that your robot sustained damage as it was honestly not our intent. We are glad to hear your team is okay. |
Re: If YOU were the GDC...
I thought my earlier post sounded a bit Polyanna, so I went through the entire thread. Most of the recommended changes would have clearly messed with the game balance. I'm not going to comment on the equipment issues; they're not really the GDCs provenance. Based on the takeaway from our drive team, I suspect that (as inspectors have said for years) most of the disconnects are on the robot side. I'm going to consider the game as the Q&As treated it, not as it was in January.
Here are the few suggestions I felt were at least worthy of comment; the others would have (IMO) wrecked the game balance. The two adjustments that I actually endorse are in red, and another that I like but can't work around is in orange..:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:12. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi