![]() |
Highest ranked team not picked?
Anyone have data for each subdivision on the highest ranked team (after quals) that was not picked for an alliance?
We were part of that cohort, I think, and my kids will want to take a look at why were were passed over as they plan for next year. Thanks for any help you have to offer, and congratulations to all the teams there for making it to the event. |
Re: Highest ranked team not picked?
Rank =/ robot abilities
Good teams scout and rank doesn't factor in picking teams. |
Re: Highest ranked team not picked?
Rankings are not a good indicator for skill. Sometimes, good teams have a lower ranking because they had a tough schedule. Other times, the reverse happens and a team gets a higher ranking than they deserve. When this happens a lot of times they will have a ranking that would lead to being picked if everyone is just picked based off of ranks. However, teams scout and that team is normally not picked. Another thing that can happen is a robot being good at a select task but non of the alliances need that skill set when it comes around for their second or third pick.
|
Re: Highest ranked team not picked?
Some of what I said here may apply.
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...5&postcount=36 |
Rank may not tell the entire story. Perhaps during quals you had strong partners or were matched against teams that had mechanical issues. There is way more to picking alliance partners than rank.
|
Re: Highest ranked team not picked?
Quote:
3932 at rank 12 Carson: 1137 at rank 14 Carver: 1262 at rank 12 Curie: 5279 at rank 19 Galileo: 4499 at rank 15 Hopper: 686 at rank 13 Newton: 2035 at rank 15 Tesla: 2522 at rank 13 |
Re: Highest ranked team not picked?
On the inverse, what was the lowest ranked team picked first?
|
Re: Highest ranked team not picked?
Quote:
|
Re: Highest ranked team not picked?
Quote:
|
Re: Highest ranked team not picked?
Agreed. Especially in this game, there is so much more to a robots ability than seed. We, team 5940, seeded 69th, but were still picked as back up for the 4th alliance.
|
Re: Highest ranked team not picked?
Quote:
|
Re: Highest ranked team not picked?
Quote:
In a nutshell, was ranking a poor metric of performance this year, more so than other years? I don't recall so many low raked teams being picked so early compared to prior years. What was it about this year's game that skewed ranking from individual performance? |
Re: Highest ranked team not picked?
Quote:
|
Re: Highest ranked team not picked?
Quote:
|
Re: Highest ranked team not picked?
Quote:
16 seeded 42nd (OPR Rank 13), and 125 seeded 33rd (OPR Rank 17) -- both were picked before you were. Teams that do a good job of scouting will generally make pick lists based on their own data, ignoring seed. OPR is more useful than seed, but not a substitute for good scouting. Good scouting is much harder to do than most teams appreciate. My own team has worked very hard at scouting this year, and we think it is still one of our top opportunities to improve. BTW, several Newton teams were higher on our pick list than they were in the OPR rankings. Your team was one of them. Back to the original poster's topic: top seeded unpicked team is not important at the Championship, because alliance captains have a 3rd pick instead of a backup robot. I think 4 team alliances make a better tournament, especially at events with 40 or more teams. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:28. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi