![]() |
paper: 2016 FRC Championship History
This is the 2016 annual update of my Championship History Spreadsheet
This sheet contains a summary of all teams who have played in the CMP playoffs since 2001. Congratulations to Citrus Circuits on maintaining the top spot. 4 trips to Einstein in a row will do that :) Other fun facts: there are 5 teams who have played in the playoffs every year for the past 12 years since the 3 vs 3 FRC format began: 27, 33, 148, 254, 1114. 3 of these teams are in the Hall of Fame, and 4 of these teams are part of #TeamIFI. 2016 FRC Championship History by Jim Zondag Congrats to all of the successes had by all teams in Stronghold! |
Re: paper: 2016 FRC Championship History
Thanks for updating this, Jim. It is very interesting to see the close correlation between your derated point ranking of teams, and my own qualitative recollections of performances I have witnessed over the years. As an example, scanning your list I instantly recognize about 2/3 of the top 150 teams without looking up their numbers.
In particular, during the 8 seasons I have been observing FiM teams from inside our system, the correlation is remarkable. I didn't need to look up any of these teams, because I recognize their numbers immediately as belonging to Michigan teams that have performed well. Below is a list of the top 31 FiM teams based on Zondag Derated Points (ZDP). Code:
FiM Team Zondag Rank ZDP NameNote: I am particularly proud of my Average Joes (3620) for making their first-ever appearance on the ZDP list this year; in previous years, we had earned zero ZDP because we did not make playoffs at CMP. Three other FiM teams also make their first ZDP list appearances in the top 150 this year: 3538, 5050, and 5460. |
Re: paper: 2016 FRC Championship History
Fantastic database, thanks!
|
Re: paper: 2016 FRC Championship History
Hey Jim,
Awesome spreadsheet as always. Just noticed a few things. I think a few world champions are listed as finalist for some reason. I'm not sure if you did that for the weight tapering system or it was just oversight, but just a thought I had. For example, I know that in 2001, 365 and 294 both were WC, but are listed and WF. |
Re: paper: 2016 FRC Championship History
Quote:
The points appeared to be correct in the old version even though they weren't listed as WC. |
Re: paper: 2016 FRC Championship History
Thanks for putting this together again!
3005 was listed as a Division Winner for Curie on the main rollup screen (Green W), but we were actually division finalists. It looks like the points calculation, ranking, and subsequent data screens are all correct based on our Division Finalist finish. Spot checking a few others on the list, it appears 3166 had a similar issue, and possibly some others. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi