![]() |
Best low goal robot
Which team, who SOLELY did low goals was the most effective this season?
|
Re: Best low goal robot
25
|
Re: Best low goal robot
2122 is the top that transitioned to a high goal. 1011 was also a great low goal bot.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
two from the PNW:
1425 5803 |
Re: Best low goal robot
I'm not sure as far as the whole world went but in IN, here are my top 2.
71- Had a very effective scaler. The scale was essentially 2 high goals. Their cycle time was also fairly low. Their low goal auto worked about half of the time too. 1529- They also had a low goal auto that I saw work at least once at IN DCMPS. I'm not sure how well it worked at worlds. They also had really fast cycle times for scoring and showed to be a great feeder bot. They also had played some great defense at IN DCMPS too. |
Re: Best low goal robot
In GA
1746 4468 |
Re: Best low goal robot
I'm surprised 3683 hasn't been mentioned yet. Their driver is great and their climber is fast.
Almost forgot, 5401 had a great showing as well. Very clean design, it's beautiful up close. |
Re: Best low goal robot
5406, Celt-X, was really efficient
|
Re: Best low goal robot
238 was an extremely effective low goaler - They were finalists at GSD and Boston, as well as winners at UNC Ashville.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
There are other excellent low goalers to name, however, including: 25 1425 639 1511 5406 To name just a few. All of these teams did excellent this season because they prioritized low goals, climbing, and driving practice over spending their resources on a high goal shooter. |
Re: Best low goal robot
Just teams I've noticed:
From the PNW- 1425 2990 4061 5803 Elsewhere- 71 836 1011 1418 3506 3604 3683 836 and 1418 dominating the CHS district championship with up to 15 low goals per match has got to be up there in terms of low goal achievements this season! |
Re: Best low goal robot
1 Attachment(s)
Just sorted the final version of the 4536 scouting database (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/3248) by Low goals teleop. This does not exclude teams with high goal capability.
The only superb low goal specialist I got to see in person was team 233 in Orlando, where they seeded 1st and won the event. They won the Orlando and Bayou regionals, and were finalists at the Lone Star regional and Carson subdivision. |
Re: Best low goal robot
I thought that 1058 did a really good job.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
1153 and 2370 were very effective low-goal-only robots in NE.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
Curie had a whole lot of great low goal shooters. 3546, 5406, 1511, 25, just to name a few.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Best low goal robot
5624. Two MAR District Event wins this year. They were on the alliance holding the record for most teleop low goals scored in a match, with themselves scoring 10 low goals alone.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
233 is a superb low goaler.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
This conversation begins and ends with 3683.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
+1 to the people who've said 5803 and 2990 - Apex had one of the quickest scores into the low goal I've seen, and 2990's collector & ability to starve their opponents of boulders was the reason that their alliance defeated the Newton upset alliance.
I'd also like to add 1983 and 610, both solid low goal robots that transitioned to high goal over the course of the season |
Re: Best low goal robot
3683 was by far the fastest I had personally seen. I generally like objective data though, and haven't seen 1425 play so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
Any conversation about the best low goal robot has to include 3102. They had one of the best drivers I have ever seen. Their robot was simple, robust and could pick up boulders, cross defenses and score with ease. They were semi-finalists at Lake Superior and won Wisconsin.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
I will second 3102 and also add 6175 - a crazy effective low goal that breached and scored in auton near every time.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
5150 - MI
|
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
|
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
|
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
Even though they had a shooter mounted all season, 319 was probably one of the top low goal machines in New England this year. For pure low goals 238 was a beast. |
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
they were incredibly good at ranking high - first at DCMP, 4th at CMP |
Re: Best low goal robot
I'm going with 5624. They could take down the tower on their own, and they consistently scored enough boulders to help their alliance win as the first pick of the #7 alliance at both of their district events.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
was, they put a high goal shooter on for championships.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Both robots are incredibly effective, and 1257 was fortunate to play in elims with both of them this season. |
Re: Best low goal robot
Obviously, this is going to be a little biased here, but I think our bot this year was a really strong low goaler, especially after we fixed our intake issue. Once we got the issues tweaked, I could easily put in 7 low goals (more if I focused only on them) while destroying 2-3 defenses, by ourselves. That combined with the fact that we never broke down, makes me believe it was a strong low goaler.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
|
Re: Best low goal robot
A deeper dive at just how good 3683 was this year.
GTR Central #1 Seed 9-1, 31 RS Regional Champs 1st in OPR (by 16+ points!) Waterloo #3 Seed (In an event that featured 148, 610, 1114, 1241, 2056, 4039, 4678, 5406) 9-4, 40 RS Semifinalists (Took one match off of the eventual Champions 1241/610/3560, the same alliance how ended 2056's streak) 7th in OPR Galileo #2 Seed 8-2, 34 RS Semifinalists 13th in OPR These guys were consistently scoring with and competing against some of the best high goal robots in the world and managed to play to their level and then some. Utterly impressive for a low goal + hang strategy. |
Re: Best low goal robot
1775 deserves a mention here as well. I remember going into Iowa confident that we would be the best low goal robot, but was then shocked to discover that they could weaken the tower by themselves, while we struggled to score 4.
They won Kansas City and then ranked third and were finalists at Iowa, which had no shortage of good high goalers. |
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
|
Re: Best low goal robot
25 had a fantastic low goal robot.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
Death by low goal is pretty much how 3506 did well at all of our events. Low goals fed by our human player over the second defense plus hanging. If we ever ran into a high goal robot we simply had a strategy in place to shut them down. With the level of play in NC, it worked every single time.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
|
Re: Best low goal robot
In terms of Chesapeake, our home district, 836 and 1418 definitely stole the show in terms of low-goal capability.
Yet, what really intrigued me was that between Finals 1 and 2, there were 0 high goals scored, and there wasn't a bot out there on the field that could score a high goal. Although this was in part due to our alliance having to bring in a backup bot, such an experience really highlights the potential effectiveness of low-goal bots this year. |
Re: Best low goal robot
Another vote for 3683 - Team DAVE out of Waterloo, Ontario.
They could comfortably solo a tower take-down with 10+ low goals, and hang at the end of a match. They could solo breach every defense, including category Cs. Their crossing speeds were elite. In conjunction with how much ball control advantage they gave their alliance, they were a very dangerous robot. I think a lot of teams got caught underestimating them because they were a low-goal robot. This is one of those robots that I wish more teams took a good look at, especially low to medium resource teams. It is a great example of how to build a really successful robot by choosing to do something simple extremely well. |
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
The low goal strategy was a big gamble. We knew that eventually high goal shooters would be able to put up points that would overtake us, but we figured that in early regionals at least, a low goal robot would be able to run more cycles, and therefore pickup more breach and capture ranking points. The nice surprise was that (after extra practice and the addition of an auto ball) we were able to seed pretty high through Waterloo and into Champs too. For whatever reason, Stronghold kept things pretty balanced between the low goal and high goal right to the end. I'll put my vote down for Team Dave 3683 as well. They shared our practice field, and we watched them drive rings around the defenses, scoring 7 or 8 "combined cycles" (crossing a new defense every second time). Throw in an auto ball and a fast climb, and they could hold their own against most high-goal shooters - definitely an inspiration for our team. |
Re: Best low goal robot
i was mostly watching MAR, but they do have some incredibly strong low goal robots.
5624 was by far one of the most capable in terms of just low goaling, taking down the tower solo at their bridgewater event nearly every match. They were also with the alliance that set the record for most tele-op low goals and even scoring 10 low goals themselves. 1257 was a fast and capable breecher bot and low goaler at all of their events. they were able to consistently breech every match and capture in most of them. they took down the defenses faster than most robots and could cycle to the low goal incredibly quick 25 is incredibly fast at the low goal, but they also had a very consistent scaler to bring to the table. they could cycle 6-7 boulders, but like 1257 was also a solid breecher in a pinch. their scaler was the icing on the cake because it was very fast and very consistent. All 3 did incredibly at worlds, with 25 being an alliance captain on curie, 1257 playing in the Archimedes semifinals, and 5624 going unpicked in Archimedes which was unfortunate as they could still put 4-6 low goals with shut down defense being played. |
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
5803 Apex got to 4th on Curie as a rookie, and ranked 1st at the PNW champs. |
Re: Best low goal robot
Prior to their transition to high goal shooters, both 319 and 1058 in NE had great low goal robots.
|
1425 Error Code Zero
|
Re: Best low goal robot
When I think of low goal robots, I think of 1418, 3683, and 1011. All were really good this year.
|
Re: Best low goal robot
3683
610 5803 5807 5406 |
Re: Best low goal robot
I'll add another to the 1058 bucket. As a sole low goaler prior to district champs they were able to shovel boulders into the low goal with ease, and secure the climb.
I saw their strength in two areas, the obvious being the points put on the board from their defense crosses, boulders scored, and those precious climb points. The second being what that does for the alliance on a psychological level. The consistency and enthusiastic-yet-calm demeaned that 1058 played with meant that many team played their best when on the field beside 1058. ~DK |
Re: Best low goal robot
Quote:
|
Re: Best low goal robot
My opinion, 5150 The hybrid hornets outta FIM. They were the captian of their alliance at MSC and made it to the finals against 67 27 1718 6086. And they played well. They consistently shot low goal and played killer defense in Elims at MSC.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi