Chief Delphi

Chief Delphi (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Forum (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Best low goal robot (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=148500)

414cnewq 05-18-2016 11:37 AM

Best low goal robot
 
Which team, who SOLELY did low goals was the most effective this season?

Ben Martin 05-18-2016 11:38 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
25

FRC_498 05-18-2016 11:40 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
2122 is the top that transitioned to a high goal. 1011 was also a great low goal bot.

Stayskull 05-18-2016 11:40 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
two from the PNW:
1425
5803

logank013 05-18-2016 11:46 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
I'm not sure as far as the whole world went but in IN, here are my top 2.

71- Had a very effective scaler. The scale was essentially 2 high goals. Their cycle time was also fairly low. Their low goal auto worked about half of the time too.

1529- They also had a low goal auto that I saw work at least once at IN DCMPS. I'm not sure how well it worked at worlds. They also had really fast cycle times for scoring and showed to be a great feeder bot. They also had played some great defense at IN DCMPS too.

JohnFogarty 05-18-2016 11:47 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
In GA
1746
4468

evanperryg 05-18-2016 11:59 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
I'm surprised 3683 hasn't been mentioned yet. Their driver is great and their climber is fast.

Almost forgot, 5401 had a great showing as well. Very clean design, it's beautiful up close.

Classified* 05-18-2016 12:00 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
5406, Celt-X, was really efficient

kyle_hamblett 05-18-2016 12:10 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
238 was an extremely effective low goaler - They were finalists at GSD and Boston, as well as winners at UNC Ashville.

Kevin Leonard 05-18-2016 12:11 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by evanperryg (Post 1587784)
I'm surprised 3683 hasn't been mentioned yet. Their driver is great and their climber is fast.

I'd argue for 3683. Just go watch their incredible driving in division semis. It's inspiring.
There are other excellent low goalers to name, however, including:
25
1425
639
1511
5406

To name just a few. All of these teams did excellent this season because they prioritized low goals, climbing, and driving practice over spending their resources on a high goal shooter.

JABot67 05-18-2016 12:26 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Just teams I've noticed:

From the PNW-
1425
2990
4061
5803

Elsewhere-
71
836
1011
1418
3506
3604
3683

836 and 1418 dominating the CHS district championship with up to 15 low goals per match has got to be up there in terms of low goal achievements this season!

Procolsaurus 05-18-2016 12:33 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
1 Attachment(s)
Just sorted the final version of the 4536 scouting database (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/3248) by Low goals teleop. This does not exclude teams with high goal capability.

The only superb low goal specialist I got to see in person was team 233 in Orlando, where they seeded 1st and won the event. They won the Orlando and Bayou regionals, and were finalists at the Lone Star regional and Carson subdivision.

adr00 05-18-2016 12:44 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
I thought that 1058 did a really good job.

JamesCH95 05-18-2016 12:52 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
1153 and 2370 were very effective low-goal-only robots in NE.

scott.smith 05-18-2016 12:54 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Curie had a whole lot of great low goal shooters. 3546, 5406, 1511, 25, just to name a few.

Kevin Leonard 05-18-2016 01:58 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by adr00 (Post 1587813)
I thought that 1058 did a really good job.

1058 switched to high goals at the New England District Championship.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Procolsaurus (Post 1587806)
The only superb low goal specialist I got to see in person was team 233 in Orlando, where they seeded 1st and won the event. They won the Orlando and Bayou regionals, and were finalists at the Lone Star regional and Carson subdivision.

233 is an excellent example I forgot about.
Quote:

Originally Posted by JABot67 (Post 1587803)
836 and 1418 dominating the CHS district championship with up to 15 low goals per match has got to be up there in terms of low goal achievements this season!

836 and 1418 are two other incredible ones I forgot.

Hallry 05-18-2016 02:04 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
5624. Two MAR District Event wins this year. They were on the alliance holding the record for most teleop low goals scored in a match, with themselves scoring 10 low goals alone.

jajabinx124 05-18-2016 02:08 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
233 is a superb low goaler.

Gregor 05-18-2016 02:17 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
This conversation begins and ends with 3683.

The other Gabe 05-18-2016 02:24 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
+1 to the people who've said 5803 and 2990 - Apex had one of the quickest scores into the low goal I've seen, and 2990's collector & ability to starve their opponents of boulders was the reason that their alliance defeated the Newton upset alliance.

I'd also like to add 1983 and 610, both solid low goal robots that transitioned to high goal over the course of the season

Knufire 05-18-2016 02:30 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
3683 was by far the fastest I had personally seen. I generally like objective data though, and haven't seen 1425 play so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.

Mitchell1714 05-18-2016 03:02 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Any conversation about the best low goal robot has to include 3102. They had one of the best drivers I have ever seen. Their robot was simple, robust and could pick up boulders, cross defenses and score with ease. They were semi-finalists at Lake Superior and won Wisconsin.

Chief Hedgehog 05-18-2016 03:05 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
I will second 3102 and also add 6175 - a crazy effective low goal that breached and scored in auton near every time.

tr6scott 05-18-2016 03:17 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
5150 - MI

Greg Needel 05-18-2016 03:27 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by scott.smith (Post 1587819)
Curie had a whole lot of great low goal shooters. 3546, 5406, 1511, 25, just to name a few.

I want to add 3005 and 836 to this list. Both of these teams had fantastic seasons pushing tons of balls into the low goal (and both in curie). 3005 was even the captain of the finalist alliance.

scott.smith 05-18-2016 05:29 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg Needel (Post 1587871)
I want to add 3005 and 836 to this list. Both of these teams had fantastic seasons pushing tons of balls into the low goal (and both in curie). 3005 was even the captain of the finalist alliance.

Yeah, 836 was incredible, mainly due to the speed at which they went around the field. The effectiveness of a low goal bot is 80% the speed and skill of a driver. A statistic I find incredible is that 3/4 of the alliance leaders (us included) on Curie were dedicated low goal shooters. (Not sure if Apex is dedicated to low goals, correct me if I'm wrong)

BrendanB 05-18-2016 05:35 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard (Post 1587841)
1058 switched to high goals at the New England District Championship.

Our bad. :p

Even though they had a shooter mounted all season, 319 was probably one of the top low goal machines in New England this year.

For pure low goals 238 was a beast.

The other Gabe 05-18-2016 05:41 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by scott.smith (Post 1587900)
(Not sure if Apex is dedicated to low goals, correct me if I'm wrong)

at least 3 people have mentioned 5803 (APEX) on here already :P ... so yes, low goal only.

they were incredibly good at ranking high - first at DCMP, 4th at CMP

jgerstein 05-18-2016 05:43 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
I'm going with 5624. They could take down the tower on their own, and they consistently scored enough boulders to help their alliance win as the first pick of the #7 alliance at both of their district events.

RyanHP 05-18-2016 06:08 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
was, they put a high goal shooter on for championships.

jajabinx124 05-18-2016 06:10 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mitchell1714 (Post 1587868)
Any conversation about the best low goal robot has to include 3102. They had one of the best drivers I have ever seen. Their robot was simple, robust and could pick up boulders, cross defenses and score with ease. They were semi-finalists at Lake Superior and won Wisconsin.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Hedgehog (Post 1587869)
I will second 3102 and also add 6175 - a crazy effective low goal that breached and scored in auton near every time.

They were actually quarter-finalists at Lake Superior, but had more than enough potential to take down the 2nd seed in Quarters, they nearly did.. Anyway I agree that 3102 and 6175 also deserve to be mentioned- both of them had efficient low goal bots that were simple, but effective at this years game. I was glad 3102 won their first regional this year, definitely was long awaited for them. 6175 was even picked at champs this years. Also, I can't leave out 4536 either. They also had an efficient low goal bot that was simple yet effective.

Brian Maher 05-18-2016 07:26 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben Martin (Post 1587760)
25

In terms of total points scored, I think 25 wins here. With their low goal auto and consistent climb, they were MAR's best low goaler and one of the best this year. However, their drive train is relatively slow, putting a limit on how many cycles they can complete compared to other low goal cyclers (though it does give them a ton of pushing power).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hallry (Post 1587843)

Quote:

Originally Posted by jgerstein (Post 1587905)
I'm going with 5624. They could take down the tower on their own, and they consistently scored enough boulders to help their alliance win as the first pick of the #7 alliance at both of their district events.

My vote for fastest low goaler goes to 5624. They really are fast, putting in as many as ten low goals a match. As Ryan mentioned, they and 223 set the record for most teleop low goals in a match this year. They won two events on the #7 alliance this year as first pick. I was floored to see them go unpicked at MAR Champs and Archimedes, especially when some alliances failed to capture after not picking a robot that can take down the tower by itself.

Both robots are incredibly effective, and 1257 was fortunate to play in elims with both of them this season.

dirtbikerxz 05-18-2016 08:50 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Obviously, this is going to be a little biased here, but I think our bot this year was a really strong low goaler, especially after we fixed our intake issue. Once we got the issues tweaked, I could easily put in 7 low goals (more if I focused only on them) while destroying 2-3 defenses, by ourselves. That combined with the fact that we never broke down, makes me believe it was a strong low goaler.

bijan311 05-18-2016 08:55 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mitchell1714 (Post 1587868)
Any conversation about the best low goal robot has to include 3102. They had one of the best drivers I have ever seen. Their robot was simple, robust and could pick up boulders, cross defenses and score with ease. They were semi-finalists at Lake Superior and won Wisconsin.

Don't forget 1675; they were great all season.

Karthik 05-18-2016 09:03 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
A deeper dive at just how good 3683 was this year.

GTR Central
#1 Seed
9-1, 31 RS
Regional Champs
1st in OPR (by 16+ points!)

Waterloo
#3 Seed (In an event that featured 148, 610, 1114, 1241, 2056, 4039, 4678, 5406)
9-4, 40 RS
Semifinalists (Took one match off of the eventual Champions 1241/610/3560, the same alliance how ended 2056's streak)
7th in OPR

Galileo
#2 Seed
8-2, 34 RS
Semifinalists
13th in OPR

These guys were consistently scoring with and competing against some of the best high goal robots in the world and managed to play to their level and then some. Utterly impressive for a low goal + hang strategy.

youngace89 05-18-2016 11:11 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
1775 deserves a mention here as well. I remember going into Iowa confident that we would be the best low goal robot, but was then shocked to discover that they could weaken the tower by themselves, while we struggled to score 4.

They won Kansas City and then ranked third and were finalists at Iowa, which had no shortage of good high goalers.

Kevin Leonard 05-19-2016 12:52 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Karthik (Post 1587946)
A deeper dive at just how good 3683 was this year.

GTR Central
#1 Seed
9-1, 31 RS
Regional Champs
1st in OPR (by 16+ points!)

Waterloo
#3 Seed (In an event that featured 148, 610, 1114, 1241, 2056, 4039, 4678, 5406)
9-4, 40 RS
Semifinalists (Took one match off of the eventual Champions 1241/610/3560, the same alliance how ended 2056's streak)
7th in OPR

Galileo
#2 Seed
8-2, 34 RS
Semifinalists
13th in OPR

These guys were consistently scoring with and competing against some of the best high goal robots in the world and managed to play to their level and then some. Utterly impressive for a low goal + hang strategy.

Watching them drive in eliminations was like watching art. It was just phenomenal how consistently aware and smooth their drivers were.

ns3517 05-19-2016 01:25 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
25 had a fantastic low goal robot.

OccamzRazor 05-19-2016 10:02 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Death by low goal is pretty much how 3506 did well at all of our events. Low goals fed by our human player over the second defense plus hanging. If we ever ran into a high goal robot we simply had a strategy in place to shut them down. With the level of play in NC, it worked every single time.

messer5740 05-19-2016 10:41 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Classified* (Post 1587787)
5406, Celt-X, was really efficient

We had a very tough time trying to defend against their effective low goal shooter at Pittsburgh. They ended up winning by 3 points against us, 3504, and 2614, in eliminations, but they ended up winning the competition. Good job 5406, it was a great match and hope to see your team in Pittsburgh next year.:D

Green Potato 05-19-2016 11:08 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
In terms of Chesapeake, our home district, 836 and 1418 definitely stole the show in terms of low-goal capability.

Yet, what really intrigued me was that between Finals 1 and 2, there were 0 high goals scored, and there wasn't a bot out there on the field that could score a high goal. Although this was in part due to our alliance having to bring in a backup bot, such an experience really highlights the potential effectiveness of low-goal bots this year.

Mr. Lim 05-19-2016 11:34 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Another vote for 3683 - Team DAVE out of Waterloo, Ontario.

They could comfortably solo a tower take-down with 10+ low goals, and hang at the end of a match. They could solo breach every defense, including category Cs. Their crossing speeds were elite.

In conjunction with how much ball control advantage they gave their alliance, they were a very dangerous robot. I think a lot of teams got caught underestimating them because they were a low-goal robot.

This is one of those robots that I wish more teams took a good look at, especially low to medium resource teams. It is a great example of how to build a really successful robot by choosing to do something simple extremely well.

nuclearnerd 05-19-2016 12:57 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by messer5740 (Post 1588121)
We had a very tough time trying to defend against their effective low goal shooter at Pittsburgh. They ended up winning by 3 points against us, 3504, and 2614, in eliminations, but they ended up winning the competition. Good job 5406, it was a great match and hope to see your team in Pittsburgh next year.:D

Thanks! That was before we got our climber running too :) Pittsburgh is definitely a possibility for 2017, pending what they decide to do with Ontario districts.

The low goal strategy was a big gamble. We knew that eventually high goal shooters would be able to put up points that would overtake us, but we figured that in early regionals at least, a low goal robot would be able to run more cycles, and therefore pickup more breach and capture ranking points. The nice surprise was that (after extra practice and the addition of an auto ball) we were able to seed pretty high through Waterloo and into Champs too. For whatever reason, Stronghold kept things pretty balanced between the low goal and high goal right to the end.

I'll put my vote down for Team Dave 3683 as well. They shared our practice field, and we watched them drive rings around the defenses, scoring 7 or 8 "combined cycles" (crossing a new defense every second time). Throw in an auto ball and a fast climb, and they could hold their own against most high-goal shooters - definitely an inspiration for our team.

FRC Fanatic 05-19-2016 06:31 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
i was mostly watching MAR, but they do have some incredibly strong low goal robots.

5624 was by far one of the most capable in terms of just low goaling, taking down the tower solo at their bridgewater event nearly every match. They were also with the alliance that set the record for most tele-op low goals and even scoring 10 low goals themselves.

1257 was a fast and capable breecher bot and low goaler at all of their events. they were able to consistently breech every match and capture in most of them. they took down the defenses faster than most robots and could cycle to the low goal incredibly quick

25 is incredibly fast at the low goal, but they also had a very consistent scaler to bring to the table. they could cycle 6-7 boulders, but like 1257 was also a solid breecher in a pinch. their scaler was the icing on the cake because it was very fast and very consistent.

All 3 did incredibly at worlds, with 25 being an alliance captain on curie, 1257 playing in the Archimedes semifinals, and 5624 going unpicked in Archimedes which was unfortunate as they could still put 4-6 low goals with shut down defense being played.

Citrus Dad 05-20-2016 11:16 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stayskull (Post 1587764)
two from the PNW:
1425
5803

1425 Error Code Xero ranked 2nd in Hopper amidst 3 high goal shooters that put in as many as 10 high goals each. They had the highest low goal OPR of all teams.

5803 Apex got to 4th on Curie as a rookie, and ranked 1st at the PNW champs.

Jack133 05-20-2016 12:04 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Prior to their transition to high goal shooters, both 319 and 1058 in NE had great low goal robots.

Jsteel 05-20-2016 01:59 PM

1425 Error Code Zero

TheBoulderite 05-20-2016 11:00 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
When I think of low goal robots, I think of 1418, 3683, and 1011. All were really good this year.

CR1305Mascotte 05-23-2016 02:34 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
3683
610
5803
5807
5406

DinerKid 05-23-2016 08:41 AM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
I'll add another to the 1058 bucket. As a sole low goaler prior to district champs they were able to shovel boulders into the low goal with ease, and secure the climb.

I saw their strength in two areas, the obvious being the points put on the board from their defense crosses, boulders scored, and those precious climb points. The second being what that does for the alliance on a psychological level. The consistency and enthusiastic-yet-calm demeaned that 1058 played with meant that many team played their best when on the field beside 1058.

~DK

Gravity 05-23-2016 12:25 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ben Martin (Post 1587760)
25

Agreed, we played them and they did exceptionally well. :)

nick4130 05-23-2016 07:06 PM

Re: Best low goal robot
 
My opinion, 5150 The hybrid hornets outta FIM. They were the captian of their alliance at MSC and made it to the finals against 67 27 1718 6086. And they played well. They consistently shot low goal and played killer defense in Elims at MSC.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi